|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 453-455
Technical comments on rodent spinal cord injuries models
Zoe Zhang1, Yi Ping Zhang2, Lisa B. E. Shields2, Christopher B Shields2
1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
2 Norton Neuroscience Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
|Date of Acceptance||18-Feb-2014|
|Date of Web Publication||9-May-2014|
M.D. Christopher B Shields
Professor, Norton Neuroscience Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY 40202
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Zhang Z, Zhang YP, Shields LB, Shields CB. Technical comments on rodent spinal cord injuries models. Neural Regen Res 2014;9:453-5
Acknowledgments: We acknowledge Norton Healthcare for their ongoing support.
Spinal cord injuries (SCI) in rodents have been created by laceration, contusion, compression, or intramedullary injection of toxic agents. The choice of an appropriate SCI model should be made for each study based on the experimental design, with care taken to avoid unintended complications such as hemorrhage. Technical comments will be made in this communication describing the 1) importance of vertebral stabilization, 2) injury preparation, and 3) landmarks to improve the precision and reproducibility of the SCI.
Rodent models of SCI have been used to assess the spectrum of pathological events following spinal cord contusion, laceration, and compressive lesions. Animal models are essential in understanding underlying injury mechanisms and determining the safety and efficacy of putative therapies prior to clinical trials. Most SCI models were initially described and characterized in the rat (Wrathall et al., 1985; Fehlings et al., 1989; Bresnahan et al., 1991; Stokes, 1992; Taoka and Okajima, 1998; Scheff et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2008). Since genetically modified mice offer unique opportunities to examine biological mechanisms following SCI, use of mouse models have increased exponentially (Burda et al., 2013; Hansen et al., 2013; Sabelstrom et al., 2013; Satkunendrarajah and Fehlings, 2013; Soderblom et al., 2013; Takeuchi et al., 2013; Wanner et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013a; Zukor et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2014; Yamamoto et al., 2014; Ziu et al., 2014). Common rodent SCI methods are briefly reviewed in this report, and pertinent technical comments are made for those dedicated to SCI research. Nerve root and conus injuries will not be discussed.
| SCI models|| |
Contusion SCI is the most clinically relevant SCI. Key parameters used to determine the severity of SCI are different in various models such as the weight of the object and drop height (NYU (Gruner, 1992), others (Wrathall et al., 1985)), injury force (IH (Wrathall et al., 1985; Scheff et al., 2003)), calibrated spring tension (Gale et al., 1985), or magnitude of spinal cord displacement (ESCID (Stokes, 1992) or LISA (Zhang et al., 2008)). The NYU device has been extensively utilized on rats but does not produce reproducible lesions in mice. The IH device is simple to use, however, it creates a lesion with an impact velocity of only 0.1 m/s, which does not reflect that seen clinically. Gears in the IH device movement also affect the reliability of injuries caused by mild forces. The signal-to-noise ratio is low using the IH device in mice. The ESCID and LISA spinal cord displacement models produce a satisfactory contusion SCI but require vertebral stabilization at the level of injury as well as precise displacement calibration. The modified aneurysm clip model is unacceptable because of variable clip blade positions applied to the spinal cord and the rate of clip release is not calibrated or standardized. There are advantages and disadvantages of each method, however, it is essential to stabilize the vertebra at the level of injury and create a precise, measureable, reproducible injury at a predetermined site. Over the past several years, our laboratory has developed the LISA system (Zhang et al., 2008) that discusses several of the shortcomings of currently available models. Specifically, the LISA answers the problems of vertebral stabilization, precise determination of displacement depth, and control and measurement of several parameters that address the impact reliability, specifically, the velocity, time, and duration of impact.
Laceration SCI may be created by using microscissors, a razor blade, a needle tip, or a wire knife under manual control (Frisen et al., 1993; Hermanns et al., 2001; Inman et al., 2002; Seitz et al., 2002). Creating a precise laceration is difficult using these methods because of imprecise depth and shape of the laceration, bleeding, and unintended contusions. Variability of laceration injuries is often recognized only by postmortem microscopic assessment of the lesion site. Alternatively, our laboratory has developed a reliable, reproducible laceration spinal cord model in rats and mice by combining vertebral stabilization and the Vibraknife (LISA) which can generate laceration SCI in the cervical or thoracic spinal cords (Zhang et al., 2004; Onifer et al., 2005; Iannotti et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2008; Hill et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2011). The oscillating blade of the Vibraknife cuts the spinal cord without tissue deformation. The depth of the laceration lesion is precisely controlled with an accuracy of ± 0.05 mm using a micro-driver. There is minimal bleeding from the spinal cord using this method (Zhang et al., 2013b). The cervical and upper thoracic (C3 to T2) laceration SCI may be created through the interlaminar spaces without concomitant bone removal.
Compression SCI is produced by a decrease in the spinal canal diameter (Ziu et al., 2014), transplanting a synthetic aromatic polyether (Karadimas et al., 2013), inserting a solid spacer into the epidural space (Dimar et al., 1999), epidural spinal cord compression using modified aneurysm clips (Nashmi and Fehlings, 2001; Weaver et al., 2001; Fehlings, 2009), or creation of a static pressure from specific weights placed epidurally (Perdiki et al., 1998; Li et al., 2004). Insertion of balloons into the subarachnoid space produce adjustable spinal cord compression, however, this method is not optimal in rodents because of their small subarachnoid space (Vanicky et al., 2001). Gradual stenosis of the spinal canal induced by epidural compression on the spinal cord is valuable in recapitulating clinical features of spinal stenosis. These models include a water-absorbing polyurethane polymer in rats (Kurokawa et al., 2011; Long et al., 2013), a polyethylene line around the vertebral body in one-month-old rats to create a model of progressive central canal stenosis (Kubota et al., 2011), or thread-driven olive-shaped compressive devices into the spinal canals of mice (Kouyoumdjian et al., 2009). Placement of these compression devices must avoid local trauma during insertion to avoid a contusion SCI that may confound imaging and behavioral outcomes.
Focal intraspinal injection models can create several types of SCI such as 1) chemical agents (lysophosphatidylcholine, cuprizone) used to induce focal spinal cord demyelination (Mi et al., 2007; Mi et al., 2009), 2) photochemical or singlet oxygen that causes focal spinal cord ischemia or infarction (Watson et al., 1986; Piao et al., 2009), 3) excitotoxic agents (quisqualic acid) that induce focal tissue necrosis (Magnuson et al., 1999; Berens et al., 2005; Nakae et al., 2011), or 4) syringomyelia caused by kaolin suspension (Zhang et al., 2012). The quality of these injuries depends on the injection of precise volumes of such agents into a specific site of the spinal cord. The slow injection into the spinal cord prevents leakage around the needle which guarantees that the anticipated amount of agent enters the spinal cord. Our contribution to this field answers the issues of vertebral stabilization to prevent motion interference from respiration, micromanipulator injection with a precision of 0.05 mm, and use of a glass micropipette for intramedullary injections (Zhang et al., 2013b).
Technical contributions of producing SCI in rodents are designed to create a reproducible, well-characterized, and predictable model to analyze short- and long-term events following SCI (Kouyoumdjian et al., 2009). Improvement in the quality of the SCI will reduce errors in the evaluation of SCI and avoid false conclusions following therapeutic studies.
(1) Secure target vertebral stabilization. The spinal column is flexible throughout its length which causes problems in creating a reliable SCI. Thus, spinal column stabilization is critical in producing predictable and reproducible experimental SCI (Kuhn and Wrathall, 1998; Zhang et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2008; Hill et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2013b). Two clamps fix the spinous processes above and below the intervening target segment. However, this method is ineffective in stabilizing the short fragile spinous processes of the cervical and thoracic vertebrae in rodents. A large number of mobile segments beneath the impact lead to variable injuries as a result of different forces striking the spinal cord [Figure 1]. Vertebral stability influences the precision of all types of SCI. Using the NYU impactor to create a contusion SCI, movement of the spinal cord increases the duration of impactor-cord contact and reduces the predicted peak force. Using the IH contusion device, the tissue displacement measurement will be greater than that which actually occurs. Without stabilization of the vertebra and spinal cord using the ESCID or LISA to create a contusion SCI, the unrestrained movement of the spinal cord would create significant errors. Anterior displacement of the vertebra and spinal cord using the NYU impactor is detected by the rebound trajectory of the falling object. Several spine fixation devices are commercially available, including the Narishige's ST-7 (Narishige International, East Meadow, NY) and the Spinal Adaptor 68091 (RWD Life Science, San Diego, CA). The drawback is that these devices are too large to integrate with the NYU impactor. Our laboratory has developed small vertebral stabilization devices designed to use in rats and mice to prevent motion during the creation of the SCI (Zhang et al., 2004; Hill et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2013b). Reduction of vertebral motion significantly improves the precision/reproducibility of the experimental SCI in rodents.
|Figure 1: Depiction of spine motion following experimental SCI comparing stabilization at different levels.|
(A) Fixation (*) of the spinous processes two levels from the target level that includes four mobile segments causing a large amount of movement during impact. (B) Fixation (*) of the spinous processes one level from the target involving movement at two joints results in decreased motion. (C) Stabilization of the facets of the target vertebra (*) bilaterally most effectively prevents motion of the target vertebra.
Click here to view
(2) Level of SCI. The segmental level of the experimental SCI depends on the purpose of the research study. Cervical SCI constitute >50% of the injuries seen clinically and, therefore, the cervical SCI injury model is the most clinically relevant. Thoracic injuries are predominantly a white matter injury and are appropriate for studies of tract regeneration. Lumbar SCI are rare and occur clinically at the T12-L1 and L1-2. They are a combination of upper and lower motor injuries, thus, are not a pure SCI (Magnuson et al., 1999). The choice of the segmental level also depends on considerations such as 1) avoidance of blood vessels to reduce hemorrhage, 2) decreased experimental mortality, and 3) increased post-SCI activity to lessen the burdens of post-injury care. Upper cervical spine surgery causes extensive bleeding of the C3 lamina that must be controlled with bone wax (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ). Bleeding from the epidural venous plexus during T9 or T10 laminectomies is easily controlled using topical thrombin soaked in Gelfoam (Pfizer, New York City, NY, USA). Severe SCI (not partial SCI, hemicontusion, or hemisection) in the upper cervical levels is devastating and of little value as an experimental model. Lower cervical and upper thoracic (C5-T3) SCIs are better. The injury level is identified counting down from the prominent C2 spinous process (Zhang et al., 2013b). Lower thoracic (T8-10) levels can be identified by the direction that the spinous processes project. The T9 and T10 spinous processes point inferiorly but T11 projects superiorly. The T9 and T11 spinous processes can be palpated through the skin. The importance of defining the lower thoracic vertebrae is vital to avoid the common mistake of performing a T11 laminectomy. The large laminar arches often lead to a laminectomy of T12 and T13, however, these levels expose the lower thoracic spinal cord, conus medullaris, and upper filum terminale. If unexpected excellent functional recovery occurs following lower thoracic SCI, it is likely that the incorrect segment was injured. A high degree of care is necessary to identify the correct segmental level at which to perform a SCI in an animal model.
| Conclusion|| |
Experimental animals share similar neurological deficits following SCI to those seen clinically and may undergo similar treatment options. High quality SCI research depends on assiduous attention to injury type, technical details, and anatomical landmarks.
| References|| |
|1.||Berens SA, Colvin DC, Yu CG, Yezierski RP, Mareci TH (2005) Evaluation of the pathologic characteristics of excitotoxic spinal cord injury with MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1612-1622. |
|2.||Bresnahan JC, Beattie MS, Stokes BT, Conway KM (1991) Three-dimensional computer-assisted analysis of graded contusion lesions in the spinal cord of the rat. J Neurotrauma 8:91-101. |
|3.||Burda JE, Radulovic M, Yoon H, Scarisbrick IA (2013) Critical role for PAR1 in kallikrein 6-mediated oligodendrogliopathy. Glia 61:1456-1470. |
|4.||Dimar JR, 2nd, Glassman SD, Raque GH, Zhang YP, Shields CB (1999) The influence of spinal canal narrowing and timing of decompression on neurologic recovery after spinal cord contusion in a rat model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1623-1633. |
|5.||Fehlings MG (2009) The impact of continued cord compression following traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine 11:568-569; discussion 569. |
|6.||Fehlings MG, Tator CH, Linden RD (1989) The relationships among the severity of spinal cord injury, motor and somatosensory evoked potentials and spinal cord blood flow. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 74:241-259. |
|7.||Frisen J, Fried K, Sjogren AM, Risling M (1993) Growth of ascending spinal axons in CNS scar tissue. Int J Dev Neurosci 11:461-475. |
|8.||Gale K, Kerasidis H, Wrathall JR (1985) Spinal cord contusion in the rat: behavioral analysis of functional neurologic impairment. Exp Neurol 88:123-134. |
|9.||Gruner JA (1992) A monitored contusion model of spinal cord injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma 9:123-126; discussion 126-128. |
|10.||Hansen CN, Fisher LC, Deibert RJ, Jakeman LB, Zhang H, Noble-Haeusslein L, White S, Basso DM (2013) Elevated MMP-9 in the lumbar cord early after thoracic spinal cord injury impedes motor relearning in mice. J Neurosci 33:13101-13111. |
|11.||Hermanns S, Reiprich P, Muller HW (2001) A reliable method to reduce collagen scar formation in the lesioned rat spinal cord. J Neurosci Methods 110:141-146. |
|12.||Hill RL, Zhang YP, Burke DA, Devries WH, Zhang Y, Magnuson DS, Whittemore SR, Shields CB (2009) Anatomical and functional outcomes following a precise, graded, dorsal laceration spinal cord injury in C57BL/6 mice. J Neurotrauma 26:1-15. |
|13.||Iannotti C, Zhang YP, Shields LB, Han Y, Burke DA, Xu XM, Shields CB (2006) Dural repair reduces connective tissue scar invasion and cystic cavity formation after acute spinal cord laceration injury in adult rats. J Neurotrauma 23:853-865. |
|14.||Inman D, Guth L, Steward O (2002) Genetic influences on secondary degeneration and wound healing following spinal cord injury in various strains of mice. J Comp Neurol 451:225-235. |
|15.||Karadimas SK, Moon ES, Yu WR, Satkunendrarajah K, Kallitsis JK, Gatzounis G, Fehlings MG (2013) A novel experimental model of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to facilitate translational research. Neurobiol Dis 54:43-58. |
|16.||Kouyoumdjian P, Lonjon N, Prieto M, Haton H, Privat A, Asencio G, Perrin FE, Gaviria M (2009) A remotely controlled model of spinal cord compression injury in mice: toward real-time analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 11:461-470. |
|17.||Kubota M, Kobayashi S, Nonoyama T, Shimada S, Takeno K, Miyazaki T, Guerrero AR, Iwamoto H, Baba H (2011) Development of a chronic cervical cord compression model in rat: changes in the neurological behaviors and radiological and pathological findings. J Neurotrauma 28:459-467. |
|18.||Kuhn PL, Wrathall JR (1998) A mouse model of graded contusive spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 15:125-140. |
|19.||Kurokawa R, Murata H, Ogino M, Ueki K, Kim P (2011) Altered blood flow distribution in the rat spinal cord under chronic compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1006-1009. |
|20.||Li GL, Farooque M, Isaksson J, Olsson Y (2004) Changes in synapses and axons demonstrated by synaptophysin immunohistochemistry following spinal cord compression trauma in the rat and mouse. Biomed Environ Sci 17:281-290. |
|21.||Long HQ, Li GS, Lin EJ, Xie WH, Chen WL, Luk KD, Hu Y (2013) Is the speed of chronic compression an important factor for chronic spinal cord injury rat model? Neurosci Lett 545:75-80. |
|22.||Magnuson DS, Trinder TC, Zhang YP, Burke D, Morassutti DJ, Shields CB (1999) Comparing deficits following excitotoxic and contusion injuries in the thoracic and lumbar spinal cord of the adult rat. Exp Neurol 156:191-204. |
|23.||Mi S, Hu B, Hahm K, Luo Y, Kam Hui ES, Yuan Q, Wong WM, Wang L, Su H, Chu TH, Guo J, Zhang W, So KF, Pepinsky B, Shao Z, Graff C, Garber E, Jung V, Wu EX, Wu W (2007) LINGO-1 antagonist promotes spinal cord remyelination and axonal integrity in MOG-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat Med 13:1228-1233. |
|24.||Mi S et al. (2009) Promotion of central nervous system remyelination by induced differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Ann Neurol 65:304-315. |
|25.||Nakae A, Nakai K, Yano K, Hosokawa K, Shibata M, Mashimo T (2011) The animal model of spinal cord injury as an experimental pain model. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011:939023. |
|26.||Nashmi R, Fehlings MG (2001) Changes in axonal physiology and morphology after chronic compressive injury of the rat thoracic spinal cord. Neuroscience 104:235-251. |
|27.||Onifer SM, Zhang YP, Burke DA, Brooks DL, Decker JA, McClure NJ, Floyd AR, Hall J, Proffitt BL, Shields CB, Magnuson DS (2005) Adult rat forelimb dysfunction after dorsal cervical spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 192:25-38. |
|28.||Perdiki M, Farooque M, Holtz A, Li GL, Olsson Y (1998) Expression of endothelial barrier antigen immunoreactivity in blood vessels following compression trauma to rat spinal cord. Temporal evolution and relation to the degree of the impact. Acta Neuropathol 96:8-12. |
|29.||Piao MS, Lee JK, Jang JW, Kim SH, Kim HS (2009) A mouse model of photochemically induced spinal cord injury. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 46:479-483. |
|30.||Sabelstrom H, Stenudd M, Reu P, Dias DO, Elfineh M, Zdunek S, Damberg P, Goritz C, Frisen J (2013) Resident neural stem cells restrict tissue damage and neuronal loss after spinal cord injury in mice. Science 342:637-640. |
|31.||Satkunendrarajah K, Fehlings MG (2013) Do omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids ameliorate spinal cord injury? Commentary on: Lim et al., Improved outcome after spinal cord compression injury in mice treated with docosahexaeonic acid. Exp Neurol 249:104-110. |
|32.||Scheff SW, Rabchevsky AG, Fugaccia I, Main JA, Lumpp JE, Jr. (2003) Experimental modeling of spinal cord injury: characterization of a force-defined injury device. J Neurotrauma 20:179-193. |
|33.||Seitz A, Aglow E, Heber-Katz E (2002) Recovery from spinal cord injury: a new transection model in the C57Bl/6 mouse. J Neurosci Res 67:337-345. |
|34.||Soderblom C, Luo X, Blumenthal E, Bray E, Lyapichev K, Ramos J, Krishnan V, Lai-Hsu C, Park KK, Tsoulfas P, Lee JK (2013) Perivascular fibroblasts form the fibrotic scar after contusive spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 33:13882-13887. |
|35.||Stokes BT (1992) Experimental spinal cord injury: a dynamic and verifiable injury device. J Neurotrauma 9:129-131; discussion 131-124. |
|36.||Takeuchi K, Yoshioka N, Higa Onaga S, Watanabe Y, Miyata S, Wada Y, Kudo C, Okada M, Ohko K, Oda K, Sato T, Yokoyama M, Matsushita N, Nakamura M, Okano H, Sakimura K, Kawano H, Kitagawa H, Igarashi M (2013) Chondroitin sulphate N-acetylgalactosaminyl-transferase-1 inhibits recovery from neural injury. Nat Commun 4:2740. |
|37.||Taoka Y, Okajima K (1998) Spinal cord injury in the rat. Prog Neurobiol 56:341-358. |
|38.||Vanicky I, Urdzikova L, Saganova K, Cizkova D, Galik J (2001) A simple and reproducible model of spinal cord injury induced by epidural balloon inflation in the rat. J Neurotrauma 18:1399-1407. |
|39.||Wanner IB, Anderson MA, Song B, Levine J, Fernandez A, Gray-Thompson Z, Ao Y, Sofroniew MV (2013) Glial scar borders are formed by newly proliferated, elongated astrocytes that interact to corral inflammatory and fibrotic cells via STAT3-dependent mechanisms after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 33:12870-12886. |
|40.||Watson BD, Prado R, Dietrich WD, Ginsberg MD, Green BA (1986) Photochemically induced spinal cord injury in the rat. Brain Res 367:296-300. |
|41.||Weaver LC, Verghese P, Bruce JC, Fehlings MG, Krenz NR, Marsh DR (2001) Autonomic dysreflexia and primary afferent sprouting after clip-compression injury of the rat spinal cord. J Neurotrauma 18:1107-1119. |
|42.||Wrathall JR, Pettegrew RK, Harvey F (1985) Spinal cord contusion in the rat: production of graded, reproducible, injury groups. Exp Neurol 88:108-122. |
|43.||Wu Q, Zhang YJ, Gao JY, Li XM, Kong H, Zhang YP, Xiao M, Shields CB, Hu G (2014) Aquaporin-4 mitigates retrograde degeneration of rubrospinal neurons by facilitating edema clearance and glial scar formation after spinal cord injury in mice. Mol Neurobiol. Jan 4. [Epub ahead of Print]. |
|44.||Yamamoto A, Sakai K, Matsubara K, Kano F, Ueda M (2014) Multifaceted neuro-regenerative activities of human dental pulp stem cells for functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Neurosci Res 78:16-20. |
|45.||Yu P, Zhang YP, Shields LB, Zheng Y, Hu X, Hill R, Howard R, Gu Z, Burke DA, Whittemore SR, Xu XM, Shields CB (2011) Inhibitor of DNA binding 2 promotes sensory axonal growth after SCI. Exp Neurol 231:38-44. |
|46.||Zhang Y, Zhang YP, Shields LB, Zheng Y, Xu XM, Whittemore SR, Shields CB (2012) Cervical central canal occlusion induces noncommunicating syringomyelia. Neurosurgery 71:126-137. |
|47.||Zhang Y, Guan Z, Reader B, Shawler T, Mandrekar-Colucci S, Huang K, Weil Z, Bratasz A, Wells J, Powell ND, Sheridan JF, Whitacre CC, Rabchevsky AG, Nash MS, Popovich PG (2013a) Autonomic dysreflexia causes chronic immune suppression after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 33:12970-12981. |
|48.||Zhang YP, Iannotti C, Shields LB, Han Y, Burke DA, Xu XM, Shields CB (2004) Dural closure, cord approximation, and clot removal: enhancement of tissue sparing in a novel laceration spinal cord injury model. J Neurosurg 100:343-352. |
|49.||Zhang YP, Walker MJ, Shields LB, Wang X, Walker CL, Xu XM, Shields CB (2013b) Controlled cervical laceration injury in mice. J Vis Exp e50030. |
|50.||Zhang YP, Burke DA, Shields LB, Chekmenev SY, Dincman T, Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Smith RR, Benton RL, DeVries WH, Hu X, Magnuson DS, Whittemore SR, Shields CB (2008) Spinal cord contusion based on precise vertebral stabilization and tissue displacement measured by combined assessment to discriminate small functional differences. J Neurotrauma 25:1227-1240. |
|51.||Ziu M, Fletcher L, Savage JG, Jimenez DF, Digicaylioglu M, Bartanusz V (2014) Spatial and temporal expression levels of specific microRNAs in a spinal cord injury mouse model and their relationship to the duration of compression. Spine J 14:353-360. |
|52.||Zukor K, Belin S, Wang C, Keelan N, Wang X, He Z (2013) Short hairpin RNA against PTEN enhances regenerative growth of corticospinal tract axons after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 33:15350-15361. |