• Users Online: 735
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
RESEARCH AND REPORT
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 661-672

Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries


Department of Microsurgery and Orthopedic Trauma, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

Correspondence Address:
M.D. Xiaolin Liu
Professor, Department of Microsurgery and Orthopedic Trauma, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: Funding: This study was supported by the National High-Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program), No. 2012A A020507; 985 Program of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 90035-3283312; Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education, No. 20120171120075; and Doctoral Start-up Project of the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, No. S201204006336., Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.130094

Rights and Permissions

Objective: To investigate the factors associated with sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries. Data Sources: The online PubMed database was searched for English articles describing outcomes after the repair of median, ulnar, radial, and digital nerve injuries in humans with a publication date between 1 January 1990 and 16 February 2011. Study Selection: The following types of article were selected: (1) clinical trials describing the repair of median, ulnar, radial, and digital nerve injuries published in English; and (2) studies that reported sufficient patient information, including age, mechanism of injury, nerve injured, injury location, defect length, repair time, repair method, and repair materials. SPSS 13.0 software was used to perform univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and to investigate the patient and intervention factors associated with outcomes. Main Outcome Measures: Sensory function was assessed using the Mackinnon-Dellon scale and motor function was assessed using the manual muscle test. Satisfactory motor recovery was defined as grade M4 or M5, and satisfactory sensory recovery was defined as grade S3 + or S4. Results: Seventy-one articles were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that repair time, repair materials, and nerve injured were independent predictors of outcome after the repair of nerve injuries (P < 0.05), and that the nerve injured was the main factor affecting the rate of good to excellent recovery. Conclusion: Predictors of outcome after the repair of peripheral nerve injuries include age, gender, repair time, repair materials, nerve injured, defect length, and duration of follow-up.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3651    
    Printed49    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded634    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 34    

Recommend this journal