|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 996-1002
Peripheral nerve repair: a hot spot analysis on treatment methods from 2010 to 2014
Guang-yao Liu1, Yan Jin2, Qiao Zhang1, Rui Li M.D. 3
1 Department of Orthopedics, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
2 Department of Ophthalmology, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
3 Hand & Foot Surgery and Reparative & Reconstruction Surgery Center, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
|Date of Acceptance||21-Apr-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||29-Jun-2015|
Hand & Foot Surgery and Reparative & Reconstruction Surgery Center, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Therapeutic strategies for neurological deficits and for promoting nerve regeneration after peripheral nerve injuries have received much focus in clinical research. Advances in basic research in recent years have increased our understanding of the anatomy of peripheral nerves and the importance of the microenvironment. Various new intervention methods have been developed, but with varying effectiveness. In the present study, we selected 911 papers on different repair methods for peripheral nerve injury from the Web of Science and indexed in the Science Citation Index from 2010 to 2014. We quantitatively examine new repair methods and strategies using bibliometrics, and we discuss the present state of knowledge and the problems and prospects of various repair methods, including nerve transfer, neural transplantation, tissue engineering and genetic engineering. Our findings should help in the study and development of repair methods for peripheral nerve injury.
Keywords: nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve injury; nerve repair; neural transplantation; nerve transfer; tissue engineering; genetic engineering; bibliometrics; Web of Science; neural regeneration
|How to cite this article:|
Liu Gy, Jin Y, Zhang Q, Li R. Peripheral nerve repair: a hot spot analysis on treatment methods from 2010 to 2014. Neural Regen Res 2015;10:996-1002
|How to cite this URL:|
Liu Gy, Jin Y, Zhang Q, Li R. Peripheral nerve repair: a hot spot analysis on treatment methods from 2010 to 2014. Neural Regen Res [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Apr 10];10:996-1002. Available from: http://www.nrronline.org/text.asp?2015/10/6/996/158368
Author contributions: LGY and LR conceived and designed the paper. LGY wrote the paper. JY and ZQ collected and analyzed the data. LR provided critical revisions. All authors approved the final version of the paper.
| Introduction|| |
Repair and reconstruction following peripheral nerve injury, especially long-segment nerve damage, is a major topic in neuroscience research and is of great clinical importance (Jiang et al., 2010). The peripheral nerve has the capacity to regenerate, but because of the low efficiency of regeneration, it is substantially impeded by the surrounding scar. As a consequence, regenerating axons are halted and may eventually form a neuroma (Jkema-Paassen et al., 2004).
Nerve autografts are considered the gold standard in the treatment of peripheral nerve injury. Recent studies have substantially increased our understanding of the role and importance of neurotrophic factors, laminin, interleukins and the immune response in peripheral nerve regeneration. Repair methods for peripheral nerve injury have used lasers, cell transplantation, and tissue and gene engineering approaches, in addition to microsurgical techniques. However, neurological recovery is still only approximately 70%. Consequently, novel strategies for enhancing the speed and extent of nerve regeneration are urgently needed.
| Data and Methodology|| |
Retrieval database: Science Citation Index (SCI).
Retrieval keywords: nerve injury, repair, anastomosis surgery, protection, nerve transfer, nerve graft.
Number of retrieved articles: 911.
Inclusion criteria: Peer-reviewed articles on peripheral nerve injury; intervention studies on peripheral nerve injury; clinical application of different repair methods for peripheral nerve injury.
Exclusion criteria: u0 npublished articles; obsolete research; repeated studies.
Analyses were performed for: (1) citations of articles on peripheral nerve injury repaired using the same method; (2) the countries and regions where many relevant articles were published; (3) the institutions from which many of the articles were written; (4) the journals that published many of the articles; (5) the foundations that supported many of the studies; and (6) basic and clinical case studies.
| Results|| |
Analysis of articles indexed in the SCI on repair methods for peripheral nerve injury
A total of 1,125 articles indexed in the SCI from 2010 to 2014 on different repair methods for peripheral nerve injury were retrieved. However, only 911 original research reports and reviews were selected, because they can better reflect the academic level of the paper.
Temporal analysis of articles from 2010 to 2014 indexed in the SCI on repair methods for peripheral nerve injury
As shown in [Figure 1], the greatest annual number of publications was 227 in 2014. From 2010 to 2014, the number of publications gradually increased. The number of publications on different repair methods for peripheral nerve injury exceeded 200 beginning in 2013. These findings suggest that repair methods for peripheral nerve injury continue to be of great concern globally.
|Figure 1 Quantitative analysis of articles indexed in the Science Citation Index from 2010 to 2014 on different repair methods for peripheral nerve injury.|
Click here to view
Countries that have published articles indexed in the SCI on repair methods for peripheral nerve injury from 2010 to 2014
Numerous countries have published articles on different repair methods for peripheral nerve injury. In particular, China had the greatest number of publications at 269, accounting for 29.53% of the total number of articles, followed by the USA, with 249 publications. Germany was in third place ([Figure 2]).
|Figure 2 Countries that have published articles indexed in the Science Citation Index on different repair methods for peripheral nerve injury.|
Click here to view
Institutions that have published articles indexed in the SCI on repair methods for peripheral nerve injury from 2010 to 2014
As shown in [Table 1], among the top eight institutions that have published articles on various methods for the repair of peripheral nerve injury, the greatest number of articles was from Nantong University, China (33 articles), followed by the University of California system (26 articles). An article written by Gu et al. (2011) entitled "Construction of tissue engineered nerve grafts and their application in peripheral nerve regeneration" was published in Progress in Neurobiology in 2011 and has been cited 99 times. Yang et al. (2011) published an article entitled "Repair of rat sciatic nerve gap by a silk fibroin-based scaffold added with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells" in Tissue Engineering Part A in 2011 that was cited 27 times. The authors of these two articles were from Nantong University in China, demonstrating that Nantong University is recognized internationally. Publications from Urmia University in Iran and the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom both numbered 25, but the average number of citations for the publications from Urmia University was less than five, suggesting that the academic level in Iran lags far behind the United Kingdom.
|Table 1 The top eight institutions that have published articles on various methods for the repair of peripheral nerve injury|
Click here to view
Citations for articles on various methods for the repair of peripheral nerve injury indexed in the SCI from 2010 to 2014
Bibliometrics shows that a major criterion for assessing the quality of an article is the number of citations that it receives. As shown in [Table 2], the majority of the nine most-cited articles were written by authors from the USA, and were primarily on the repair of brachial plexus injury. An article entitled "Alginate: properties and biomedical applications" was written by Lee et al. (2012) from Harvard University, and has been cited 278 times. This article describes the application of alginate and its hydrogels in biomedical science and engineering, and provides new perspectives for future studies on peripheral nerve injury using these polymers.
|Table 2 Highly-cited articles on different methods for the repair of peripheral nerve injury indexed in the SCI|
Click here to view
Intervention methods for the repair of peripheral nerve injury in articles indexed in the SCI
As shown in [Figure 3], nerve transfer is the first choice for treatment of peripheral nerve injury. Cell transplantation combined with nerve growth factors and other trophic factors has become a major intervention method for treating peripheral nerve injury. Tissue-engineered nerve grafts consist of a nerve scaffold containing seed cells and neurotrophic factors (Gu et al., 2011). The extensive application of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (Wakao et al., 2010) and adipose-derived stem cells (Zhang et al., 2010; Marconi et al., 2012; Tomita et al., 2013) has increased the bioactivity and supply of seed cells. Controlled release of neurotrophins in combination with a variety of other factors has increased the effectiveness of transplantation (Liu et al., 2011). Moreover, the combined application of multiple factors in tissue-engineered peripheral nerve grafts results in synergistic effects that exceed the effects of the factors individually (Erba et al., 2010; Ao et al., 2011; Reid et al., 2011; Luo et al., 2012).
|Figure 3 Different methods for the repair of peripheral nerve injury in articles indexed in the Science Citation Index.|
Click here to view
The top eight countries that have published articles on various methods for the repair of peripheral nerve injury indexed in the SCI from 2010 to 2014 are disparities, generally, the USA ranks first in the fields of nerve transfer, cell transplantation and genetic engineering for the repair of peripheral nerve injury, followed by China and Brazil, however, the most articles on tissue-engineered material and neurotrophic factor for repairing peripheral nerve injury were mainly published by Chinese authors, and the Americans ranks second. As to using anastomosis for the repair of peripheral nerve injury, Japan is the leader, followed by the USA and France ([Table 3]).
|Table 3 The top eight countries that have published articles on various methods for the repair of peripheral nerve injury|
Click here to view
Analysis of articles on nerve transfer for the repair of peripheral nerve injury indexed in the SCI from 2010 to 2014
As shown in [Table 4], the nine most-cited articles on nerve transfer were mainly written by authors from the USA, and mainly focused on the repair of brachial plexus injury. An article entitled "Nerve transfers: indications, techniques, and outcomes" written by Tung et al. (2010) from the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, has been cited 52 times. In this article, the authors review current strategies using motor and sensory nerve transfers for peripheral nerve lesions of the upper extremities in the management of proximal and brachial plexus injuries. The authors also discuss recent developments in the treatment of more distal and isolated nerve injuries in the forearm and hand.
|Table 4 Highly-cited articles on nerve transfer for the repair of peripheral nerve injury|
Click here to view
Garg et al. (2011) published an article entitled "Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: a systematic review and analysis" that has been cited 32 times. These authors searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies in which patients had surgery for traumatic upper brachial plexus palsy within 1 year of injury and with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, and compared the effects of nerve transfer and nerve transplantation. Their results suggest that, compared with conventional nerve grafting, dual nerve transfer can substantially improve shoulder and elbow function in patients with complete traumatic C5-6 upper brachial plexus injuries and promote nerve regeneration. These data may be helpful to surgeons considering intraoperative options, particularly in cases in which the native nerve root or trunk may appear less than optimal.
Millesi (1982) pioneered microsurgery and made a significant contribution to the treatment of peripheral nerve damage. In microsurgery, surgeons usually use the same nerve branch for anastomosis to achieve the best repair effect. However, peripheral nerve injury is often accompanied by surrounding soft tissue defects, and the pathological process is complex. Therefore, the operation cannot fully restore function (Tinghog et al., 2013). In general, in patients with minor defects or no defects, end-to-end anastomosis can be used, and the epineurium and perineurium are sutured (Zhao et al., 1992; Weber et al., 2005). Neurolysis is needed if the nerves adhere to the surrounding tissue. The nerves should be dissociated from scar tissue to expose the normal nerve tract. Common anastomosis techniques include side-to-side anastomosis, end-to-side anastomosis and end-to-end anastomosis.
Yuksel et al. (1999) investigated the effect of side-to-side anastomosis on peripheral nerve regeneration in the rat. A total of 30 rats were equally divided into three groups. End-to-end anastomosis, end-to-side anastomosis and side-to-side anastomosis were utilized to repair the injured peroneal nerve. The authors found that nerve regeneration was better in the side-to-side anastomosis group than in the end-to-side anastomosis group, suggesting that side-to-side anastomosis can be used to promote nerve regeneration after tumor resection or nerve graft removal. This article has been cited 25 times.
Wan et al. (2014) concluded that end-to-side anastomosis was not suitable for incomplete facial paralysis. Facial paralysis was induced by transecting the facial nerve in the rat. Nine weeks later, repair was performed using hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis, and the nerve gap was bridged using a pre-degenerated peroneal nerve graft. Four months later, muscle action potential recording and retrograde labeling revealed successful establishment of connections between the hypoglossal and facial nerves. This study demonstrates that hypoglossal-nerve side-to-side anastomosis combined with nerve transplantation can be used to treat incomplete facial paralysis, and that it does not impact the function of residual normal axons.
Cage et al. (2013) reported a case of biceps muscle reinnervation after side-to-side anastomosis of an intact median nerve to a damaged musculocutaneous nerve. Nine months after surgery, electromyographic and nerve conduction studies showed that the biceps muscle was reinnervated partly by donor axons from the healthy median nerve and partly by the recovering musculocutaneous nerve. This demonstrates that side-to-side anastomosis of an intact median to an injured musculocutaneous nerve provides dual reinnervation of the biceps muscle, and simultaneously minimizes injury to both donor and recipient nerves.
Analysis of articles on tissue-engineered materials for the repair of peripheral nerve injury indexed in the SCI from 2010 to 2014
Composite bioengineered material containing an acellular nerve matrix and synthetic biodegradable material can be used as an ideal scaffold for the repair of peripheral nerve injuries. Acellular nerve scaffolds are not limited by availability as are autologous nerves or by graft rejection, and strength and plasticity are similar to autologous nerves. Moreover, the microenvironment is more conducive to peripheral nerve regeneration. Synthetic biodegradable materials have a number of advantages such as biodegradability, plasticity and greater permeability. Analysis results are shown in [Table 5].
|Table 5 Analysis of articles on tissue-engineered materials for the repair of peripheral nerve injury|
Click here to view
Analysis of articles on cell transplantation for the repair of peripheral nerve injury indexed in the SCI from 2010 to 2014
Nerve autografts are considered the gold standard for the repair of nerve defects that are greater than 50-mm long or cannot undergo tension-free suturing (Doolabh et al., 1996; Valero-Cabre et al., 2001). The use of nerve scaffolds has reasonable success for short-segment nerve defects (shorter than 10 mm in rats). Nevertheless, when the length of the injured nerve exceeds a certain limit, the use of a nerve scaffold alone blocks nerve regeneration, because of the lack of support cells in the scaffold (Doolabh et al., 1996). Functional seed cells implanted in the nerve scaffold secrete growth factors and extracellular matrix molecules, which provides a favorable microenvironment for nerve regeneration. The most-studied functional seed cells are Schwann cells, olfactory ensheathing cells, neural stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells and embryonic stem cells. Analysis results are shown in [Table 6].
|Table 6 Analysis of articles on cell transplantation for the repair of peripheral nerve injury|
Click here to view
Analysis of articles on cells combined with tissue-engineered materials for the repair of peripheral nerve injury indexed in the SCI from 2010 to 2014
Analysis results are shown in [Table 7].
|Table 7 Analysis of articles on cell transplantation combined with tissue-engineered materials for the repair of peripheral nerve injury|
Click here to view
Analysis of articles on gene therapy for the repair of peripheral nerve injury indexed in the SCI from 2010 to 2014
Gene therapy is the therapeutic delivery of nucleic acid into cells to treat disease by overcoming protein deficiency or inhibiting overexpression of certain genes in vivo. Mason et al. (2011) published an article entitled "Gene therapy for the peripheral nervous system: a strategy to repair the injured nerve?" in 2011 in Current Gene Therapy that has been cited 21 times. The authors discuss the potential of gene therapy as an adjunct strategy alongside surgical repair techniques for promoting peripheral nerve regeneration in rodent models. Hu et al. (2010) observed that the accuracy of sensory axon reinnervation is enhanced by overexpression of nerve growth factor distal to the bifurcation. They used the femoral nerve as a model. Recombinant adenovirus encoding nerve growth factor was injected along the saphenous branch close to the bifurcation 1 week after injury to enhance sensory axon targeting. The accuracy of axon reinnervation was assessed by retrograde tracing at 3 or 8 weeks after nerve injury. Nerve growth factor overexpression increased the accuracy of saphenous branch axon reinnervation to the appropriate nerve branch, independent of its effect in enhancing the speed and extent of axonal regeneration. This finding provides in vivo evidence that the expression of a neurotrophin enhances the targeting of distal peripheral axons into the appropriate nerve branch. Gene therapy is still in the early experimental stage, but it is expected to have substantial therapeutic potential for nerve damage in the near future.
| Discussion|| |
Long-term basic and clinical studies show that techniques for the repair of peripheral nerve injury are constantly developing and that hot points constantly evolve.
(1) Nerve transfer is the first choice for repairing peripheral nerve injuries. Nerve autografts are considered the gold standard for the treatment of long-segment nerve injuries. With the development of tissue engineering and gene therapy, the number of articles on nerve transfer has decreased. The institutions where many of the articles on nerve transfer were written are in China.
(2) The number of articles on cell transplantation combined with tissue-engineered materials has increased. Most of the articles focus on the recovery of function in animal models. Combined application is a hot point in present surgical treatment.
(3) Many of the relevant articles were written by institutes in the USA. These articles on peripheral nerve injury play an important role in guiding future research.
(4) Researchers in China mainly focus their attention on surgical treatment, and the articles are of a high academic level. However, Chinese studies do not often use drug therapy, cell transplantation, nerve factors or gene therapy.
(5) Approaches using biomaterials in the repair of peripheral nerve injury have developed rapidly, but the use of biomaterials is still mainly limited to scaffolds for nerve autografts. Composite bioengineered materials containing an acellular nerve matrix and synthetic biodegradable substances may be ideal scaffolds for the repair of peripheral nerve injuries and defects. Seed cells and neurotrophic factors are needed to obtain good nerve regeneration.
(6) Gene therapy has broad application prospects for peripheral nerve repair. Nevertheless, gene therapy has some shortcomings at present, such as the lack of efficient and sustainable exogenous gene expression and the biological risk associated with viral vectors. However, in the near future, this technology will become an important method for the clinical repair of peripheral nerve injury.
(7) Combining increasingly sophisticated microsurgical techniques with tissue and genetic engineering will help to improve the efficiency of peripheral nerve repair.
| References|| |
Ao Q, Fung CK, Tsui AY, Cai S, Zuo HC, Chan YS, Shum DK (2011) The regeneration of transected sciatic nerves of adult rats using chitosan nerve conduits seeded with bone marrow stromal cell-derived Schwann cells. Biomaterials 32:787-796.
Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF (2010) Nerve root grafting and distal nerve transfers for C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries. J Hand Surg Am 35:769-775.
Borschel GH, Kawamura DH, Kasukurthi R, Hunter DA, Zuker RM, Woo AS (2012) The motor nerve to the masseter muscle: an anatomic and histomorphometric study to facilitate its use in facial reanimation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:363-366.
Cage TA, Simon NG, Bourque S, Noss R, Engstrom JW, Ralph JW, Kliot M (2013) Dual reinnervation of biceps muscle after side-to-side anastomosis of an intact median nerve and a damaged musculocutaneous nerve. J Neurosurg 119:929-933.
Carlsen BT, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2011) Comparison of single versus double nerve transfers for elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:269-276.
di Summa PG, Kingham PJ, Raffoul W, Wiberg M, Terenghi G, Kalbermatten DF (2010) Adipose-derived stem cells enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1544-1552.
di Summa PG, Kalbermatten DF, Pralong E, Raffoul W, Kingham PJ, Terenghi G (2011) Long-term in vivo regeneration of peripheral nerves through bioengineered nerve grafts. Neuroscience 181:278-291.
Doolabh VB, Hertl MC, Mackinnon SE (1996) The role of conduits in nerve repair: a review. Rev Neurosci 7:47-84.
Erba P, Mantovani C, Kalbermatten DF, Pierer G, Terenghi G, Kingham PJ (2010) Regeneration potential and survival of transplanted undifferentiated adipose tissue-derived stem cells in peripheral nerve conduits. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:e811-817.
Garg R, Merrell GA, Hillstrom HJ, Wolfe SW (2011) Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: a systematic review and analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:819-829.
Gu X, Ding F, Yang Y, Liu J (2011) Construction of tissue engineered nerve grafts and their application in peripheral nerve regeneration. Prog Neurobiol 93:204-230.
Hu X, Cai J, Yang J, Smith GM (2010) Sensory axon targeting is increased by NGF gene therapy within the lesioned adult femoral nerve. Exp Neurol 223:153-165.
Huang W, Begum R, Barber T, Ibba V, Tee NC, Hussain M, Arastoo M, Yang Q, Robson LG, Lesage S, Gheysens T, Skaer NJ, Knight DP, Priestley JV (2012) Regenerative potential of silk conduits in repair of peripheral nerve injury in adult rats. Biomaterials 33:59-71.
IJkema-Paassen J, Jansen K, Gramsbergen A, Meek MF (2004) Transection of peripheral nerves, bridging strategies and effect evaluation. Biomaterials 25:1583-1592.
Jiang X, Lim SH, Mao HQ, Chew SY (2010) Current applications and future perspectives of artificial nerve conduits. Exp Neurol 223:86-101.
Kale SS, Glaus SW, Yee A, Nicoson MC, Hunter DA, Mackinnon SE, Johnson PJ (2011) Reverse end-to-side nerve transfer: from animal model to clinical use. J Hand Surg Am 36:1631-1639.e2.
Kehoe S, Zhang XF, Boyd D (2012) FDA approved guidance conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve injury: a review of materials and efficacy. Injury 43:553-572.
Kemp SW, Alant J, Walsh SK, Webb AA, Midha R (2010) Behavioural and anatomical analysis of selective tibial nerve branch transfer to the deep peroneal nerve in the rat. Eur J Neurosci 31:1074-1090.
Kundu B, Rajkhowa R, Kundu SC, Wang X (2013) Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:457-470.
Lee KY, Mooney DJ (2012) Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 37:106-126.
Liu JJ, Wang CY, Wang JG, Ruan HJ, Fan CY (2011) Peripheral nerve regeneration using composite poly(lactic acid-caprolactone)/nerve growth factor conduits prepared by coaxial electrospinning. J Biomed Mater Res A 96:13-20.
Luo H, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Jin Y (2012) The protection of MSCs from apoptosis in nerve regeneration by TGFbeta1 through reducing inflammation and promoting VEGF-dependent angiogenesis. Biomaterials 33:4277-4287.
Madduri S, Papaloïzos M, Gander B (2010) Trophically and topographically functionalized silk fibroin nerve conduits for guided peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials 31:2323-2334.
Marconi S, Castiglione G, Turano E, Bissolotti G, Angiari S, Farinazzo A, Constantin G, Bedogni G, Bedogni A, Bonetti B (2012) Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells systemically injected promote peripheral nerve regeneration in the mouse model of sciatic crush. Tissue Eng Part A 18:1264-1272.
Mason MR, Tannemaat MR, Malessy MJ, Verhaagen J (2011) Gene therapy for the peripheral nervous system: a strategy to repair the injured nerve? Curr Gene Ther 11:75-89.
Millesi H (1982) Microsurgery of peripheral nerves. Ann Chir Gynaecol 71:56-64.
Parrinello S, Napoli I, Ribeiro S, Wingfield Digby P, Fedorova M, Parkinson DB, Doddrell RD, Nakayama M, Adams RH, Lloyd AC (2010) EphB signaling directs peripheral nerve regeneration through Sox2-dependent Schwann cell sorting. Cell 143:145-155.
Ray WZ, Mackinnon SE (2011) Clinical outcomes following median to radial nerve transfers. J Hand Surg Am 36:201-208.
Ray WZ, Pet MA, Yee A, Mackinnon SE (2011) Double fascicular nerve transfer to the biceps and brachialis muscles after brachial plexus injury: clinical outcomes in a series of 29 cases. J Neurosurg 114:1520-1528.
Reid AJ, Sun M, Wiberg M, Downes S, Terenghi G, Kingham PJ (2011) Nerve repair with adipose-derived stem cells protects dorsal root ganglia neurons from apoptosis. Neuroscience 199:515-522.
Tinghog P, Hillert J, Kjeldgard L, Wiberg M, Glaser A, Alexanderson K (2013) High prevalence of sickness absence and disability pension among multiple sclerosis patients: a nationwide population-based study. Mult Scler 19:1923-1930.
Tomita K, Madura T, Sakai Y, Yano K, Terenghi G, Hosokawa K (2013) Glial differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells: implications for cell-based transplantation therapy. Neuroscience 236:55-65.
Tung TH, Mackinnon SE (2010) Nerve transfers: indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Hand Surg Am 35:332-341.
Valero-Cabre A, Tsironis K, Skouras E, Perego G, Navarro X, Neiss WF (2001) Superior muscle reinnervation after autologous nerve graft or poly-L-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone (PLC) tube implantation in comparison to silicone tube repair. J Neurosci Res 63:214-23.
Wakao S, Hayashi T, Kitada M, Kohama M, Matsue D, Teramoto N, Ose T, Itokazu Y, Koshino K, Watabe H, Iida H, Takamoto T, Tabata Y, Dezawa M (2010) Long-term observation of auto-cell transplantation in non-human primate reveals safety and efficiency of bone marrow stromal cell-derived Schwann cells in peripheral nerve regeneration. Exp Neurol 223:537-547.
Wan H, Zhang L, Li D, Hao S, Feng J, Oudinet JP, Schumacher M, Liu S (2014) Hypoglossal-facial nerve "side"-to-side neurorrhaphy for persistent incomplete facial palsy. J Neurosurg 120:263-372.
Weber RV, Mackinnon SE (2005) Bridging the neural gap. Clin Plast Surg 32:605-616.
Xie J, MacEwan MR, Schwartz AG, Xia Y (2010) Electrospun nanofibers for neural tissue engineering. Nanoscale 2:35-44.
Yang Y, Yuan X, Ding F, Yao D, Gu Y, Liu J, Gu X (2011) Repair of rat sciatic nerve gap by a silk fibroin-based scaffold added with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A 17:2231-2244.
Yüksel F, Karacaoğlu E, Güler MM (1999) Nerve regeneration through side-to-side neurorrhaphy sites in a rat model: a new concept in peripheral nerve surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2092-2099.
Zhang Y, Luo H, Zhang Z, Lu Y, Huang X, Yang L, Xu J, Yang W, Fan X, Du B, Gao P, Hu G, Jin Y (2010) A nerve graft constructed with xenogeneic acellular nerve matrix and autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 31:5312-5324.
Zhao Q, Dahlin LB, Kanje M, Lundborg G (1992) Specificity of muscle reinnervation following repair of the transected sciatic nerve. A comparative study of different repair techniques in the rat. J Hand Surg Br 17:257-261.
Zhu Y, Wang A, Patel S, Kurpinski K, Diao E, Bao X, Kwong G, Young WL, Li S (2011) Engineering bi-layer nanofibrous conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 17:705-715.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]
|This article has been cited by|
||Variation in expression of small ubiquitin-like modifiers in injured sciatic nerve of mice
| ||Dian-Ying Zhang,Kai Yu,Zhong Yang,Xiao-Zhi Liu,Xiao-Fang Ma,Yan-Xia Li |
| ||Neural Regeneration Research. 2019; 14(8): 1455 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Proteomic analysis of trans-hemispheric motor cortex reorganization following contralateral C7 nerve transfer
| ||Yin Yuan,Xiu-yue Xu,Jie Lao,Xin Zhao |
| ||Neural Regeneration Research. 2018; 13(2): 331 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Sutureless nerve repair with ECM bioscaffolds and laser-activated chitosan adhesive
| ||Neill J. Turner,Scott A. Johnson,Leslie J. R. Foster,Stephen F. Badylak |
| ||Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Pig Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Rosettes Parallel Human Differentiation Into Sensory Neural Subtypes
| ||Robin L. Webb,Amalia Gallegos-Cárdenas,Colette N. Miller,Nicholas J. Solomotis,Hong-Xiang Liu,Franklin D. West,Steven L. Stice |
| ||Cellular Reprogramming. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Functional self-assembling peptide nanofiber hydrogel for peripheral nerve regeneration
| ||Xiaoli Wu,Liumin He,Wen Li,Heng Li,Wai-Man Wong,Seeram Ramakrishna,Wutian Wu |
| ||Regenerative Biomaterials. 2016; : rbw034 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|