• Users Online: 119
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 244-245

Finding chemopreventatives to reduce amyloid beta in yeast

1 School of Science and Health Innovations Research Institute, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2 Centre of Excellence for Alzheimer's disease Research and Care, School of Medical Sciences, Edith Cowan University; CHIRI Biosciences Research Precinct, School of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

Date of Acceptance18-Dec-2015
Date of Web Publication16-Mar-2016

Correspondence Address:
Ian G Macreadie
School of Science and Health Innovations Research Institute, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.177729

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Macreadie IG, Arvanitis C, Bharadwaj P. Finding chemopreventatives to reduce amyloid beta in yeast . Neural Regen Res 2016;11:244-5

How to cite this URL:
Macreadie IG, Arvanitis C, Bharadwaj P. Finding chemopreventatives to reduce amyloid beta in yeast . Neural Regen Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 19];11:244-5. Available from: http://www.nrronline.org/text.asp?2016/11/2/244/177729

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of age-related dementia with the latest report (WorldAlzheimerReport, 2015) showing 46.8 million people are currently affected by dementia. That number is expected to double every 20 years unless there is effective therapeutic intervention.

The 42 amino acid peptide known as amyloid beta (or Aß) has been implicated as one of the main causative agents of AD after its discovery in plaques in 1985 (Masters et al., 1985). Since then evidence has accumulated to support the association between AD and Aß.

However, progress to find a cure for AD has been very slow, due to lack of reliable models and a lack of understanding about what role Aß plays in AD (reviewed in Moosavi et al., 2015).

For a period, funding agencies including the Alzheimer's Association and the Alzheimer's Drug Foundation were turning away from projects focused on Aß. To be fair, part of the rationale was probably to diversify their portfolio, but certainly many have questioned the approaches used in Aß research.

Convincing evidence of Aß being the cause of AD has been sought through treatments with therapeutic antibodies that bind and remove Aß. Such treatments include the humanized monoclonal antibodies crenezumab (a homologue of bapineuzamab). Results in clinical trials with bapineuzumab were initially promising and showed clearance of brain amyloid and the lowering of phosphorylated tau protein in the cerebrospinal fluid, however, people did not recover from AD. The failure to cure AD (Panza et al., 2012) led many to doubt that Aß should be the prime target for the treatment of AD, resulting in a backlash against research on Aß as a drug target (e.g., see Hyman and Sorger, 2015). The recent antibody trial is showing some promise, although it did not meet the desired end points (Underwood, 2015).

Two non-exclusive hypotheses for the failures are poor blood- brain barrier penetration (0.1%) and treatment of patients who progressed too far to recover from the disease. Now the tide may turn. A major trial, using people who have no disease but who have biomarkers indicating a likely progression to AD, is addressing the question of whether therapeutic antibodies against Aß might prevent AD. The early indications are that therapeutic antibodies that clear Aß can indeed prevent or delay development of AD. Aß appears like it will be in vogue as a target once again!

Therapeutic antibodies are magic bullets for acute diseases like cancer. They are very expensive but affordable in a wealthy society over the relatively short duration for the treatment of acute diseases. But therapeutic antibodies are not the answer for prevention of a chronic disease like AD. They are simply not affordable, and they appear impractical for extended use. They are important in establishing that Aß is a valid target for therapy but frequent injections and huge on-going cost means that long term use as a therapy is not viable.

While a description of all the metabolic pathways of Aß production and clearance is beyond the scope of this perspective, (for a review see Zhang et al., 2011), the well documented beneficial effects of statins can be mentioned. Studies have found up to a 70 % decreased risk of AD in people taking statins and reduced production of Aß. The stains, originally used as cholesterol inhibitors are now being used to manage neurodegenerative disorders such as vascular dementia and AD. In a research article focusing on effects of Simvastatin in AD, researchers demonstrated a differential dose-dependent effect with Simvastatin on hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme (BACE) in cultured AD cytoplasmic hybrid cells (cybrid cells). These Cybrid cells are being used in research to study dysfunctional mitochondria in AD pathogenesis (Jeong et al., 2015).

There is growing interest in naturally derived compounds as chemopreventatives to remove Aß. Such compounds should be taken conveniently, which means it is best if they can be ingested. Epidemiology suggests there are many compounds in existing foods that may be useful for chemoprevention of AD (Pandey and Risvi, 2009). Since we have reasonable ideas about the molecular basis of Aß, it is important that we incorporate these ideas into rational screening for AD chemopreventatives.

What do we know about Aß and what it does? We know that Aß accumulates in brains with age. In yeast we have found that young cells, that are newly budded, remove Aß. Slightly older cells also clear it. But the oldest cells, "grand mothers" retain the Aß. We know this from in vitro studies where the Aß is fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) (see [Figure 1]. The older cells are readily recognized by the presence of multiple bud scars: one bud scar is left for every cell budded off. In [Figure 1], isogenic cells from the same parent can be observed: the older cells with multiple bud scars (stained with calcofluor) have accumulated Aß and exhibit green fluorescence. It can also be observed that the older cells pass the green fluorescent fusion protein to their progeny, and for a brief time the bud is fluorescent, but it rapidly disappears due to increased autophagy in the young cell.
Figure 1 Amyloid beta persists in older yeast cells.
(A) Two pairs of yeast cells that are budding. (B) Cells producing amyloid beta fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) and the fluorescence is readily observed in older cells as punctate patches. (C) Bud scars that are stained with calcofluor. The young cells receive the fluorescent amyloid beta but rapidly remove it (not shown)

Click here to view

How do we apply this knowledge? We can screen for compounds that reduce the Aß related pathology in a cell population. Our detailed methods of doing this are recently published (Porzoor and Macreadie, 2015). Useful compounds (a) increase clearance of Aß, or (b) reduce Aß induced toxicity. Such compounds may be useful as chemopreventatives that reduce the level of Aß, and they may have broader benefits for other age-related protein misfolding diseases. Laterpiridine is a compound that has some history as an AD drug and yeast screening studies show that it increases turnover of Aß (Bharadwaj et al., 2012). It has also been shown that pure components of green tea, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), and salvianolic acid (from the traditional Chinese herb, Danshen) lead to reduced levels of Aß (Porzoor et al., 2015). Interestingly in vitro studies also show that EGCG and salvianolic acid block fibril formation, suggesting the direct interaction between amyloid beta and these compounds (Porzoor et al., 2015). To explain the in vivo results it would appear that such binding targets the Aß-salvianolic acid complex, or Aß-EGCG complex for degradation. An alternate explanation is that salvianolic acid or EGCG might trigger autophagy independently. Either way, the removal of Aß is the desired outcome.

Aß is cytotoxic as an oligomeric species, and this characteristic also lends itself to screening. Such screening can be performed using the exogenous addition of chemically-synthesised Aß. However, recently doubts have been created about the preparation of such peptide (Porzoor et al., 2014). The more common hexafluoroisopropanol method results in toxic peptide, but an ammonium hydroxide preparation results in Aß that stimulates growth. Which preparation is biologically relevant? Certainly cellular toxicity is widely looked at, but stimulation of growth may be relevant, since neuronal cells are terminally differentiated and do not divide, but in AD many neuronal cells are found to have entered a cell division cells that has led to their death! The more convenient assay is to look for oligomerisation in the Aß fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP). Monomeric Aß fused to GFP will exhibit full fluorescence levels, but the dimeric species is not expected to fluoresce. Therefore increasing green fluorescence should also be a good outcome. Indeed this is the basis of assays developed in E. coli, where all fusion protein is non-fluorescent, but fluorescent in the presence of oligomerisation inhibitors (Park et al., 2011).

The ability of yeast to be used as a tool for screening anti amyloidogenic compounds is a useful and unique contribution. It can be adapted to high throughput use, it informs about compounds that are bioavailable, and it requires no Aß preparation. In a world that seeks new ways to lower Aß, the yeast assays should be valuable additions to moving forward.

AD chemopreventatives are an economical approach to protect the future aging population. The solution will not be a single compound but is likely to comprise pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals that not only target Aß but improve overall cell robustness.[18]

  References Top

Bharadwaj PR, Verdile G, Barr RK, Gupta V, Steele JW, Lachenmayer LM, Yue Z, Ehrlich ME, Petsko G, Ju S, Ringe D, Sankovich SE, Caine JM, Macreadie IG, Gandy S, Martins RN (2012) Latrepirdine (DimebonTM) enhances autophagy and reduces intracellular GFP-Aß42 levels in yeast. J Alzheimers Dis 32:949-967.  Back to cited text no. 1
Hyman BT, Sorger P (2015) Failure analysis of clinical trials to test the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Annals Neurol 76:159-161.  Back to cited text no. 2
Jeong JH, Yum KS, Chang JY, Kim M, Ahn JY, Kim S, Lapchak PA, Han MK (2015) Dose-specific effect of simvastatin on hypoxia-induced HIF-1á and BACE expression in Alzheimer′s disease cybrid cells. BMC Neurol 15:127.  Back to cited text no. 3
Jonsson T, Atwal JK, Steinberg S, Snaedal J, Jonsson PV, Bjornsson S, Stefansson H, Sulem P, Gudbjartsson D, Maloney J, Ho K (2012) A mutation in APP protects against Alzheimer′s disease and age-related cognitive decline. Nature 488:96-99.  Back to cited text no. 4
Masters CL, Simms G, Weinman NA, Multhaup G, McDonald BL, Beyreuther K (1985) Amyloid plaque core protein in Alzheimer disease and down syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82:4245-4259.  Back to cited text no. 5
McLean CA, Cherny RA, Fraser FW, Fuller SJ, Smith MJ, Beyreuther K, Bush AI, Masters CL (1999) Soluble pool of Abeta amyloid as a determinant of severity of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer′s disease. Ann Neurol 46:860-866.  Back to cited text no. 6
Moosavi B, Mousavi B, Macreadie IG (2015) Yeast model of Aß and tau aggregation in Alzheimer′s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 47:9-16.   Back to cited text no. 7
Pandey KB, Rizvi SI (2009) Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2:270-278.   Back to cited text no. 8
Panza F, Solfrizzi V, Imbimbo BP, Logroscino G (2014) Amyloid-directed monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of Alzheimer′s disease: the point of no return? Expert Opin Biol Ther 10:1465-1476.  Back to cited text no. 9
Park SL, Pegan SD, Mescar AD, Jungbauer LM, Du MJL, Leibman SW (2011) Development and validation of a yeast high-throughput screen for inhibitors of Aß42 oligomerization. Dis Models Mech 4:822-831.  Back to cited text no. 10
Porzoor A, Macreadie I (2013) Application of yeast to study the tau and amyloid-ß abnormalities of Alzheimer′s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 35:217-225.  Back to cited text no. 11
Porzoor A, Caine JM, Macreadie IG (2014) Pretreatment of chemically-synthesized Aß42 affects its biological activity in yeast. Prion 8:404-410.  Back to cited text no. 12
Porzoor A, Macreadie I (2015) Yeast as a model for aggregation toxicity in Alzheimer′s disease, autophagic responses and drug screening. In: Systems biology of Alzheimer′s disease: Methods and protocols (Castrillo JI, Oliver SG, eds), pp217-226. Humana Press Ch.  Back to cited text no. 13
Porzoor A, Alford B, Hügel HM, Grando D, Caine J, Macreadie I (2015) Anti-amyloidogenic properties of some phenolic compounds. Biomolecules 5:505-527.  Back to cited text no. 14
Scheuner D, Eckman C, Jensen M, Song X, Citron M, Suzuki N, Bird TD,Hardy J, Hutton M, Kukull W, Larson E, Levy-Lahad E, Vitanen M, Peskind E, Poorkaj P, Schellenberg G, Tanzi R, Wasco W, Lannfelt L, Selkoe D, et al. (1996) Secreted amyloid beta-protein similar to that in the senile plaques of Alzheimer′s disease is increased in vivo by the presenilin 1 and 2 and APP mutations linked to familial Alzheimer′s disease. Nature Med 2:864-870.  Back to cited text no. 15
Underwood E (2015) Alzheimer′s amyloid theory gets modest boost. Science 349:464.  Back to cited text no. 16
WorldAlzheimerReport 2015 Available at http://www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2015.pdf  Back to cited text no. 17
Zhang Y, Thompson R, Zhang H, Xu H (2011) APP processing in Alzheimer′s disease. Mol Brain 4:3.  Back to cited text no. 18


  [Figure 1]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded57    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal