• Users Online: 1709
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 172-178

Brain pathways of pain empathy activated by pained facial expressions: a meta-analysis of fMRI using the activation likelihood estimation method


1 Clinical Medicine, First Clinical Medicine School, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
2 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

Date of Submission11-Oct-2018
Date of Acceptance12-Jun-2018
Date of Web Publication21-Nov-2018

Correspondence Address:
Wen Wu
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81473769 (to WW), 81772430 (to WW); a grant from the Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates of Southern Medical University of Guangdong Province of China in 2016, No. 201612121057 (to WW), Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.243722

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Objective: The objective of this study is to summarize and analyze the brain signal patterns of empathy for pain caused by facial expressions of pain utilizing activation likelihood estimation, a meta-analysis method.
Data Sources: Studies concerning the brain mechanism were searched from the Science Citation Index, Science Direct, PubMed, DeepDyve, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, Wanfang, VIP, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and other databases, such as SpringerLink, AMA, Science Online, Wiley Online, were collected. A time limitation of up to 13 December 2016 was applied to this study.
Data Selection: Studies presenting with all of the following criteria were considered for study inclusion: Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging, neutral and pained facial expression stimuli, involvement of adult healthy human participants over 18 years of age, whose empathy ability showed no difference from the healthy adult, a painless basic state, results presented in Talairach or Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates, multiple studies by the same team as long as they used different raw data.
Outcome Measures: Activation likelihood estimation was used to calculate the combined main activated brain regions under the stimulation of pained facial expression.
Results: Eight studies were included, containing 178 subjects. Meta-analysis results suggested that the anterior cingulate cortex (BA32), anterior central gyrus (BA44), fusiform gyrus, and insula (BA13) were activated positively as major brain areas under the stimulation of pained facial expression.
Conclusion: Our study shows that pained facial expression alone, without viewing of painful stimuli, activated brain regions related to pain empathy, further contributing to revealing the brain’s mechanisms of pain empathy.

Keywords: nerve regeneration; facial expression; pain empathy; functional magnetic resonance imaging; GringleALE; activation likelihood estimation; brain function imaging; anterior cingulate cortex; anterior central gyrus; fusiform gyrus; insula; neural regeneration


How to cite this article:
Xiong RC, Fu X, Wu LZ, Zhang CH, Wu HX, Shi Y, Wu W. Brain pathways of pain empathy activated by pained facial expressions: a meta-analysis of fMRI using the activation likelihood estimation method. Neural Regen Res 2019;14:172-8

How to cite this URL:
Xiong RC, Fu X, Wu LZ, Zhang CH, Wu HX, Shi Y, Wu W. Brain pathways of pain empathy activated by pained facial expressions: a meta-analysis of fMRI using the activation likelihood estimation method. Neural Regen Res [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Mar 23];14:172-8. Available from: http://www.nrronline.org/text.asp?2019/14/1/172/243722

Chinese Library Classification No. R445; R741





  Introduction Top


“Empathy” refers to the feeling and understanding of others’ emotions and thoughts. Pain, a relatively subjective experience, can elicit our empathy. Empathy for pain is a process in which people perceive, evaluate, and respond to the pain of others (Decety et al., 2008; Loggia et al., 2008).

Study of the brain’s mechanisms of pain is progressing because of the development of neurophysiology and the wider application of imaging technology (Davis et al., 1997) in recent years. Empathy induced by pained expressions has realistic significance. Healthcare workers can be alert to patients’ pain by watching their facial expressions. Picture-based paradigms (Simon et al., 2008) and cue-based paradigms (Lamm et al., 2011) are the main patterns applied to the study of empathy for pain.

Presenting a series of images evokes empathy for pain from subjects in the former paradigm. Most of the images depict painful injuries in limbs or neutral situations (Kam et al., 2014), and some record pained expressions (Vachon-Presseau et al., 2012). Abstract visuals are applied in the cue-based paradigm. Most studies suggest that the insular and cingulate cortices are activated by empathy (Singer and Lamm, 2009). Brain mechanisms differ because of diverse factors, including positive and negative experience (Enzi et al., 2016). The brain regions activated can change according to changes in activation intensity. However, there are few studies concerning the mechanisms of empathy for pain elicited by pained expressions.

Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis to integrate and interpret the relevant functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies based on the differences in brain patterns elicited by pain. Using the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) method, the activated brain regions of merged samples were analyzed to explore the brain signal patterns associated with empathy for pain.

ALE is a kind of analysis method that is based on the voxel coordinates of the function of the brain regions positioning (Turkeltaub et al., 2002). ALE uses the three-dimensional Gaussian function smoothness and arranges inspection into the activated regional center coordinates described in multiple papers to define accurate positions of the activated brain regions.

Compared with traditional chart review, the greatest advantage of ALE lies in its objective and quantitative analysis; in other words, ALE works in a voxel-by-voxel fashion (Laird et al., 2009), to avoid the subjectivity of traditional chart review.


  Data and Methods Top


Literature retrieval

Studies written in English were retrieved from Science Citation Index, Science Direct, PubMed, DeepDyve, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, Wanfang, VIP, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and other databases, such as SpringerLink, American Medical Association, Science Online, and Wiley Online. The research reported herein was undertaken with a time limitation of up to 13 December 2016.

The key words were “facial AND expression AND pain AND empathy AND fMRI (or functional MRI)”. All authors participated in the literature search by computer and secondary search by hand. Unpublished literature was not included.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

The studies were randomized controlled trials; the blinding method and the allocation concealment scheme were not taken into account when developing inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies presenting with all of the following criteria were considered for study inclusion:

  1. Use of fMRI;
  2. The subjects were shown neutral and pained facial expression stimuli;
  3. The experiments involved adult healthy human participants. The basic state was painless.
  4. The subjects were over 18 years of age.
  5. The results were presented in Talairach or Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates.
  6. Multiple studies by the same team as long as they used different raw data.


Exclusion criteria

Studies with one or more of the following conditions were excluded from this analysis:

  1. Studies with data other than only facial expressions or short video stimulation.
  2. In addition to facial expressions, other stimuli were displayed in the picture or video.
  3. Animal studies.
  4. Abstracts, summaries, case reports, minutes of meetings, lectures, and reviews.
  5. Unpublished literature.


Interventions

The experimental group looked at a picture or short video, showing a volunteer with a pained expression. The control group looked at a picture or short video showing a volunteer with a neutral expression.

Literature screening and data extraction

The data collected included:

  • Title, author, and publication date.
  • Experimental group and (if used) control group information: Number of trials, proportion of male and female participants, average age, basic state, interventions, outcome indicators, and scanning methods.
  • Brain-related data: Brain area, hemisphere, voxel value (x, y, z), coordinate system, t value, and z value.
  • Statistical information: statistical methods, positive and negative activation.


Data processing and analysis

Coordinate transformation

The Lancaster (icbm2tal) transformation in GingerALE 2.3.6 software (Research Imaging Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA) was used to convert all coordinates to the Talairach coordinate system, and then all the converted coordinates were input into GingerALE 2.3.6 software for processing. A single data analysis was performed.

Parameter setting

According to the maximum activation coordinates peak and the three-dimensional Gaussian distribution model, the specific parameters were set as follows: P value ≤ 0.01, minimum cluster volume > 200 mm3. There was sufficient data to calculate brain ALE distribution.

Image processing

Mango 4.0.2 software (Research Imaging Institute) was used to map the three-dimensional coordinate data to the brain anatomical background of the Talairach coordinate space.


  Results Top


Retrieval results

A total of 440 studies were retrieved. Based on the title and abstract, 392 studies were excluded, including abstracts, summaries, minutes of meetings, lectures, and reviews, as well as non-fMRI studies. The full text of the remaining 48 studies was read by the two authors. Applying the inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, and interventions, 36 studies were initially considered and excluded. The full texts of the remaining 12 studies were read for the second time, and 4 studies with repetitive data or of low quality were excluded, leaving eight studies. Eight studies were considered in the final analysis (Budell et al., 1932; Botvinick et al., 2005; Simon et al., 2007; Danziger et al., 2009; Budell and Jackson, 2010; Eickhoff et al., 2012; Sheng et al., 2013; Hadjikhani et al., 2014) [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Flow diagram of literature screening.

Click here to view


Baseline data analysis and quality evaluation

Baseline data and quality evaluation are listed in [Table 1].
Table 1: Basic inclusion criteria for articles

Click here to view


Meta-analysis results

Increased activation in the brain areas under the stimulation of facial expressions of pain [Table 2] and [Figure 2] showed 20 foci in eight trials with healthy subjects, including left precentral gyrus (BA44), left inferior frontal gyrus (BA45), bilateral middle temporal gyrus (BA37), right fusiform gyrus (BA37), left thalamus ventral lateral nucleus, bilateral putamen, bilateral amygdala, left cingulate gyrus (BA32), right middle temporal gyrus (BA39), right superior temporal gyrus (BA22), left inferior occipital gyrus (BA18), left middle occipital gyrus (BA18), right caudate body, left inferior occipital gyrus (BA19), right insula (BA13), left middle temporal gyrus (BA21), right middle frontal gyrus (BA46), and left inferior frontal gyrus (BA47). Because the activation in the brain areas of facial expression of pain is affected by age (Martin et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2006), the results are based on subjects in the young and middle ages ranging from 15–47 years.
Table 2: Brain areas activated by the stimulation of facial expressions of pain

Click here to view
Figure 2: Main activated brain areas for empathy induced by images of pained facial expressions.
(A–D) The orange zones show that (A) the precentral gyrus (BA 44, −44, 12, 8), (B) the right insula (BA13, 56, −34, 22), (C) the right middle temporal gyrus (BA37, 42, −60, −2) and (D) the left cingulate gyrus (BA32, −4, 10, 40), which were activated under the stimulation of facial expressions of pain. The anterior cingulate cortex (BA32), anterior central gyrus (BA44), fusiform gyrus, and insula (BA13) were activated positively as major brain areas. BA: Brodmann area; (−44, 12, 8), (56, −34, 22), (42, −60, −2), (−4, 10, 40): Montreal Neurological Institute coordinate.


Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Pain is a physiological and psychological activity, including the feeling and response to pain (Li et al., 2018). Empathy refers to the process of experiencing the situation of others, so as to feel and understand the emotions of others. Empathy with pain is the individual’s perception, judgment, and emotional response to the pain of others (Danziger, 2006). Existing studies using picture-based paradigms are inconsistent. We aimed to explore the sympathetic brain regions based on facial expressions from eight eligible studies. In this study, data from eight eligible studies were analyzed using GingerALE 2.3.6, and images were processed with Mango 4.0.1. Our results showed that the fusiform gyrus, cingulate gyrus, precentral gyrus, ventral lateral nucleus, inferior occipital gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, and insula were activated by the sight of a person with a pained expression.

Pained facial expressions cause pain and empathy

Previous studies have shown that the anterior cingulate gyrus and the insula belong to the painful sympathetic core networks (Gu and Han, 2007), which are responsible for the processing of emotional components of the pain experience (Price, 2000). The cingulate gyrus is associated with somatosensory awareness (especially pain perception related to emotional judgment) (Hsieh et al., 1996; Killgore and Yurgelun-Todd, 2007) and the regulation of physical and visceral activities; the anterior insula is associated with emotion, coordinating BA14, BA15, and BA16 to deal with sensory experience and to identify facial expression (Gornotempini et al., 2001). In this study, the cingulate gyrus (BA32) and inferior insula (BA13) were highly activated by the sight of pained expressions, indicating that, as with other experimental paradigms, the painful sympathetic core networks were also activated when watching others’ pained facial expressions. This suggests that simply watching facial expression can activate the pain sympathetic core networks. In addition, the precentral gyrus (BA44) was also highly activated, which may be due to its mirrored neurons (Leube et al., 2001; Lotze et al., 2006). Through this neuronal activity, the observer consciously shows similar expressions or similar brain activities (Rizzolatti and Craighero, 2004; Keysers, 2009). Therefore, some scholars believe that it is because of the mirror neurons that humans have the ability to empathize (Cheng et al., 2008).

Pain empathy and physical pain have a common neural network

By directly stimulating the brain, the activated brain areas generally include the primary sensory cortex (S1), secondary sensory cortex (S2), insula, and anterior cingulate cortex (Apkarian et al., 2005). The lateral thalamus is also involved in sensory formation (Ro et al., 2007). This study found that the brain areas activated by an expression of pain also include the insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and ventral lateral nucleus. A large number of studies have shown that activation by pain is mainly in the anterior cingulate cortex and insula (Jackson et al., 2005, 2006; Ogino et al., 2006; Moriguchi et al., 2007; Morrison and Downing, 2007; Lamm et al., 2011), and these areas overlap with the responses of the brain to a pained expression. We can conclude that body pain and empathy for pain share some common parts of the nerve pathways, which mainly comprise the emotion-related brain areas.

Pain empathy mainly includes an emotional element, which is different from that of physical pain

The sensory components of the pain experience are processed by the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex (S1, S2), which is based on their anatomical structures and their connection with the subcortical region and the spine; thus, they primarily process and identify sensory stimulation of the body (Rainville et al., 1997; Rainville, 2002; Fusar-Poli et al., 2009). Because this study does not involve direct physical pain stimulation, the results do not contain S1 and S2. This reflects that empathy is an emotional experience rather than a somatic sensation. Studies have shown that the secondary sensory cortex and sensory motor cortex are activated only when there is direct stimulation by pain (Singer et al., 2004). These findings also support the findings of this study. However, some studies indicate that even in the absence of actual pain stimuli, the sensorimotor cortex will be activated (Ogino et al., 2006; Gu and Han, 2007). This may result from the differences in research paradigms and stimulus patterns (Lamm et al., 2011). It is noteworthy that some scholars have found that the empathetic brain areas and the emotional components of pain are not exactly the same (Jackson et al., 2006). This may indicate that pain empathy is not equivalent to pain emotional processing.

The brain areas associated with facial recognition and facial expression

The brain regions involved in facial recognition may include the fusiform gyrus, inferior occipital gyrus, anterior central gyrus, and insula (Saarela et al., 2007; Zhen et al., 2013). In this study, the brain area associated with simple face recognition is mainly the fusiform gyrus. The fusiform gyrus is located between the temporal gyrus and the hippocampus, with the ability to recognize a face and body. The region within that responsible for face recognition is called the fusiform face area (Kanwisher et al., 1997; Slotnick and White, 2013; Axelrod and Yovel, 2015). The fusiform face area can produce similar recognition for non-face visual images (McCarthy et al., 1997; Rossion et al., 2000), which is a prerequisite for facial perception and is associated with the posterior temporal gyrus (BA21), both belonging to the visual cortex. However, the fusiform gyrus is not only activated under the stimulation of facial expressions; although the fusiform face area is a part of the fusiform gyrus and is responsible for face recognition, the fusiform gyrus has further functions, such as processing information on non-facial stimulation. Studies have shown that the fusiform gyrus is also activated in subjects who are watching others’ hands and feet (Eidelman-Rothman et al., 2016), indicating that it is widely involved in general recognition.

Facial expression recognition and general simple visual stimulation are different

Investigating studies using the picture paradigm, this analysis is bound to find data involving the activation of visual pathways (Deyo et al., 2004).

The suboccipital region (BA18) is the secondary visual cortex, and together with BA19 constitutes the visual cortex. However, the visual cortex was not highly activated. This indicates that during pain empathy caused by watching a pained expression, the production of visual information is only a relatively minor stage. Combined with the fusiform gyrus, which is highly activated, it can be seen that the recognition and processing of faces and facial expressions are the leading steps: in other words, the activation of the brain area involved in facial recognition distinguishes stimulation by facial expression from stimulation by nonfacial images.

From the results of our study, the occipital lobe, the frontal lobe, the temporal lobe, and the limbic system were differently and strongly activated. Based on the existing studies and combined with this meta-analysis, we can make assumptions that an image of a pained facial expression produces a pain sympathetic activation of the brain regions as follows:

The pained facial expression image can stimulate the emotional network, which produces spontaneous emotion processing. The image activates the occipital lobe first, followed by the temporal lobe, the insula, the limbic system, and other emotional networks. Among them, the frontal lobe processes the emotional stimulation. In other words, the frontal lobe processes awareness through the integration of physical and subjective feelings and objective information (Osborn and Derbyshire, 2010).

In addition, the human brain will produce direct emotions compared with the self’s existing emotional experience, and will then recognize the emotions caused directly by some certain stimuli and find the part that belongs to the empathetic feelings. The prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and other brain areas related to memory and cognition were activated after the emotional network was activated. The cingulate gyrus, hippocampal gyrus, and other parts of the pain sympathetic core network are strongly activated, and then the empathy for pain occurs (Zhou et al., 2004).

The limitations of this study are as follows: (1) Despite repeated searches and manual review, the number of included studies is still insufficient: the sample capacity is small, and can easily cause statistical error. (2) Parts of the studies did not test the subjects’ ability for empathy (Mazza et al., 2015), leading to a decline in the quality of this article. (3) Because of an insufficient number of articles, we did not divide the stimulating methods into two groups (static pictures and dynamic short videos), and we did not distinguish between a first-person perspective (imagining that you are suffering the same painful experience as a character in the picture) and a third-person perspective (imagine yourself witnessing the suffering of the characters in the picture)..

In conclusion, the ALE analysis showed that the anterior cingulate cortex, insula, anterior central gyrus (BA44), and fusiform gyrus were activated positively in response to images of pained facial expressions. Pained facial expressions activated the brain regions related to pain empathy, including areas of the emotional circuit and facial recognition, further contributing to revealing the brain’s mechanisms of pain empathy.[56]

Author contributions: Writing of the discussion section: RCX and LZW; data analysis: XF; data integration: CHZ; image preparation: HXW. All authors approved the final version of the paper.

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Financial support: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81473769 (to WW), 81772430; a grant from the Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates of Southern Medical University of Guangdong Province of China in 2016, No. 201612121057 (to WW). The conception, design, execution, and analysis of this manuscript, as well as the preparation of and decision to publish this manuscript, were made independent of any funding organization.

Reporting statement: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

Copyright license agreement: The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.

Data sharing statement: Datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Open peer reviewer: Chaur-Jong Hu, Taipei Medical University, China.

Additional file: Open peer review report 1[Additional file 1].

Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81473769 (to WW), 81772430 (to WW); a grant from the Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates of Southern Medical University of Guangdong Province of China in 2016, No. 201612121057 (to WW).





 
  References Top

1.
Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede R, Zubieta J (2005) Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain 9:463.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Axelrod U,Yovel G (2015) Successful decoding of famous faces in the fusiform face area. PLoS One 10:e0117126.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Botvinick M, Jha AP, Bylsma LM, Fabian SA, Solomon PE, Prkachin KM (2005) Viewing facial expressions of pain engages cortical areas involved in the direct experience of pain. Neuroimage 25:312-319.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Budell L, Jackson PP (2010) Brain responses to facial expressions of pain: Emotional or motor mirroring? Neuroimage 53:355-363.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Budell L, Kunz M, Jackson PL, Rainville P (2015) Mirroring pain in the brain: emotional expression versus motor imitation. PLoS One 10:e107526.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Cheng Y, Yang C, Lin C, Lee P, Decety J (2008) The perception of pain in others suppresses somatosensory oscillations: a magnetoencephalography study. Neuroimage 40:1833-1840.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Danziger N (2006) Is pain the price of empathy? The perception of others’ pain in patients with congenital insensitivity to pain. Brain 129:2494-2507.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Danziger N, Faillenot I, Peyron R (2009) Can we share a pain we never felt? Neural correlates of empathy in patients with congenital insensitivity to pain. Neuron 61:203-212.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Davis KD, Taylor SJ, Crawley AP, Wood ML, Mikulis DJ (1997) Functional MRI of pain- and attention-related activations in the human cingulate cortex. J Neurophysiol 77:3370-3380.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Decety J, Michalska KJ, Akitsuki Y (2008) Who caused the pain? An fMRI investigation of empathy and intentionality in children. Neuropsychologia 46:2607-2614.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Deyo KS, Prkachin KM, Mercer SR (2004) Development of sensitivity to facial expression of pain. Pain 107:16-21.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Eickhoff SB, Bzdok D, Laird AR, Kurth F, Fox PT (2012) Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage 59:2349-2361.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Eidelman-Rothman M, Goldstein A, Weisman O, Schneiderman I, Zagoory-Sharon O, Decety J, Feldman R (2016) Prior exposure to extreme pain alters neural response to pain in others. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 16:662-671.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Enzi B, Amirie S, Brune M (2016) Empathy for pain-related dorsolateral prefrontal activity is modulated by angry face perception. Exp Brain Res 234:3335-3345.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Fusar-Poli P, Placentino A, Carletti F, Landi P, Allen P, Surguladze S, Benedetti F, Abbamonte M, Gasparotti R, Barale F, Perez J, McGuire P, Politi P (2009) Functional atlas of emotional faces processing: a voxel-based meta-analysis of 105 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Psychiatry Neurosci 34:418-432.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Gornotempini ML, Pradelli S, Serafini M, Pagnoni G, Baraldi P, Porro C, Nicoletti R, Umità C, Nichelli P (2001) Explicit and incidental facial expression processing: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 14:465-473.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Gu X, Han S (2007) Attention and reality constraints on the neural processes of empathy for pain. Neuroimage 36:256-267.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Gu X, Han S (2007) Neural substrates underlying evaluation of pain in actions depicted in words. Behav Brain Res 181:218-223.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Hadjikhani N, Zürcher NR, Rogier O, Hippolyte L, Lemonnier E, Ruest T, Ward N, Lassalle A, Gillberg N, Billstedt E (2014) Emotional contagion for pain is intact in autism spectrum disorders. Transl Psychiatry 4:e343.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Hsieh JC, Hannerz J, Ingvar M (1996) Right-lateralised central processing for pain of nitroglycerin-induced cluster headache. Pain 67:59-68.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Jackson PL, Meltzoff AN, Decety J (2005) How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage 24:771-779.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Jackson PL, Brunet E, Meltzoff AN, Decety J (2006) Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain. Neuropsychologia 44:752-761.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kam JW, Xu J, Handy TC (2014) I don’t feel your pain (as much): the desensitizing effect of mind wandering on the perception of others’ discomfort. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 14:286-296.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM (1997) The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci 17:4302-4311.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Keysers C (2009) Mirror neurons. Curr Biol 21:R971-R973.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Killgore WD, Yurgelun-Todd DA (2007) Unconscious processing of facial affect in children and adolescents. Soc Neurosci 2:28-47.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Laird AR, Eickhoff SB, Kurth F, Fox PM, Uecker AM, Turner JA, Robinson JL, Lancaster JL, Fox PT (2009) ALE Meta-analysis workflows via the brainmap database: progress towards a probabilistic functional brain atlas. Front Neuroinform 3:23.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Lamm C, Decety J, Singer T (2011) Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage 54:2492-2502.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Leube DT, Erb M, Grodd W, Bartels M, Kircher TT (2001) Differential activation in parahippocampal and prefrontal cortex during word and face encoding tasks. Neuroreport 12:2773-2777.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Li Y, Feng C, Ning M, Xu F, Song ZH, Huang ZB, Xiao HY (2018) Angiotensin II receptor antagonist EMA401 used for sciatic nerve constriction-induced neuropathic pain in rats: behavior assessment and anaIgesic mechanisms. Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yanjiu 22:1909-1914.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Loggia ML, Mogil JS, Bushnell MC (2008) Empathy hurts: compassion for another increases both sensory and affective components of pain perception. Pain 136:168-176.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Lotze M, Heymans U, Birbaumer N, Veit R, Erb M, Flor H, Halsband U (2006) Differential cerebral activation during observation of expressive gestures and motor acts. Neuropsychologia 44:1787-1795.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Martin R, Williams J, Hadjistavropoulos T, Hadjistavropoulos HD, MacLean M (2005) A qualitative investigation of seniors’ and caregivers’ views on pain assessment and management. Can J Nurs Res 37:142.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Mazza M, Tempesta D, Pino MC, Nigri A, Catalucci A, Guadagni V, Gallucci M, Iaria G, Ferrara M (2015) Neural activity related to cognitive and emotional empathy in post-traumatic stress disorder. Behav Brain Res 282:37-45.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
McCarthy G, Puce A, Gore JC, Allison T (1997) Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci 9:605-610.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Moriguchi Y, Decety J, Ohnishi T, Maeda M, Mori T, Nemoto K, Matsuda H, Komaki G (2007) Empathy and judging other’s pain: an fMRI study of alexithymia. Cereb Cortex 17:2223-2234.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Morrison I, Downing PE (2007) Organization of felt and seen pain responses in anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroimage 37:642-651.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Ogino Y, Nemoto H, Inui K, Saito S, Kakigi R, Goto F (2006) Inner experience of pain: imagination of pain while viewing images showing painful events forms subjective pain representation in human brain. Cereb Cortex 17:1139-1146.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Osborn J, Derbyshire SW (2010) Pain sensation evoked by observing injury in others. Pain 148:268-274.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Price DD (2000) Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science 288:1769-1772.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Rainville P (2002) Brain mechanisms of pain affect and pain modulation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:195-204.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Rainville P, Duncan GH, Price DD, Carrier B, Bushnell MC (1997) Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 277:968-971.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:169-192.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Ro T, Farnè A, Johnson RM, Wedeen V, Chu Z, Wang ZJ, Hunter JV, Beauchamp MS (2007) Feeling sounds after a thalamic lesion. Ann Neurol 62:433-441.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Rossion B, Dricot L, Devolder A, Bodart JM, Crommelinck M, De Gelder B, Zoontjes R (2000) Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci 12:793-802.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Saarela MV, Hlushchuk Y, Williams AC, Schurmann M, Kalso E, Hari R (2007) The compassionate brain: humans detect intensity of pain from another’s face. Cereb Cortex 17:230-237.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Sheng F, Liu Q, Li H, Fang F, Han S (2013) Task modulations of racial bias in neural responses to others’ suffering. Biol Psychol 92:380-386.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Simon D, Craig KD, Miltner WHR, Rainville P (2007) Brain responses to dynamic facial expressions of pain. Pain 126:309-318.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Simon D, Craig KD, Gosselin F, Belin P, Rainville P (2008) Recognition and discrimination of prototypical dynamic expressions of pain and emotions. Pain 135:55-64.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Singer T, Lamm C (2009) The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann NY Acad Sci 1156:81-96.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Singer T, Seymour B, O J, Doherty, Kaube H, Dolan RJ (2004) Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303:1157-1162.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Slotnick SD, White RC (2013) The fusiform face area responds equivalently to faces and abstract shapes in the left and central visual fields. Neuroimage 83:408-417.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Turkeltaub P, Eden G, Jones K, Zeffiro T (2002) Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation. NeuroImage 16:765-780.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Vachon-Presseau E, Roy M, Martel MO, Albouy G, Chen J, Budell L, Sullivan MJ, Jackson PL, Rainville P (2012) Neural processing of sensory emotional-communication information associated with the perception of vicarious pain. Neuroimage 63:54-62.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Zhen Z, Fang H, Liu J (2013) The hierarchical brain network for face recognition. PLoS One 8:e59886.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Zhou S, Zhou W, Chen X (2004) Spatiotemporal analysis of ERP during Chinese idiom comprehension. Brain Topogr 17:27-37.  Back to cited text no. 56
    

P-Reviewer: Hu CJ; C-Editor: Zhao M; S-Editors: Wang J, Li CH; L-Editors: Cone L, de Souza M, Qiu Y, Song LP; T-Editor: Liu XL


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Data and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed459    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded86    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]