• Users Online: 826
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
PERSPECTIVE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 10  |  Page : 1000-1002

Two types of auditory glutamatergic synapses and their implications for repairing damaged central auditory pathways


Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA

Date of Acceptance24-Apr-2014
Date of Web Publication6-Jun-2014

Correspondence Address:
Ph.D. Charles C. Lee
Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Louisiana State University, School of Veterinary Medicine, Skip Bertman Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.133158

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Lee CC. Two types of auditory glutamatergic synapses and their implications for repairing damaged central auditory pathways. Neural Regen Res 2014;9:1000-2

How to cite this URL:
Lee CC. Two types of auditory glutamatergic synapses and their implications for repairing damaged central auditory pathways. Neural Regen Res [serial online] 2014 [cited 2022 Jan 24];9:1000-2. Available from: http://www.nrronline.org/text.asp?2014/9/10/1000/133158

For the mammalian brain to process and decipher the rich panoply of sounds that abound in the world, nature has evolved an elegant collection of neural circuits dedicated to this task. Indeed, the complexity, variety and number of neural pathways devoted to computing auditory information is unique among sensory modalities (Kaas, 2008). After the initial sensorineural encoding of sound at the level of the cochlea, auditory information is processed in several lower brainstem centers and eventually converges in the midbrain, at the level of the inferior colliculus (Wenstrup, 2005). Subsequently, auditory information is transferred through the thalamus, the medial geniculate body, and then the auditory cortex (Winer et al., 2005; Razak and Fuzessery, 2010; Hackett, 2011; Lee and Sherman, 2011; Lee and Winer, 2011; Imaizumi and Lee, 2013; Lee and Imaizumi, 2013). From here, the common view holds that auditory information is processed through a series of corticocortical connections, from which stimulus features such as sound location and identity are extracted (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991; Romanski et al., 1999; Carrasco and Lomber, 2009; Hackett, 2011). In this manner, perceptual features of such sound attributes are computationally decoded across multiple auditory cortical areas (Callan et al., 2006; Tsytsarev et al., 2009; Callan et al., 2012).

Throughout the entirety of the auditory pathway, excitatory glutamatergic projections primarily link neural stations with one another. In addition, inhibitory projections, primarily local glycinergic and GABAergic neurons, act to shape and refine these afferent signals (Winer et al., 1996; Caspary et al., 2008). Although glutamatergic pathways on the whole have been regarded as primarily information-bearing routes, our recent studies suggest an alternative perspective; specifically, that some glutamatergic pathways in the central auditory system instead modulate the information received through the information-bearing glutamatergic pathways (Lee and Sherman, 2008, 2009, 2010a, b, 2011). Furthermore, these distinctions among glutamatergic pathways are not limited to the auditory system and are also found in the visual and somatosensory pathways (Reichova and Sherman, 2004; Tanaka and Miyashita, 2009; Lo et al., 2013).

A constellation of morphological and physiological synaptic properties classifies the auditory glutamatergic pathways into two main types. The first type of glutamatergic projection exhibits thick axons that terminate in large synaptic terminals, ending on dendritic locations proximal to the neuronal cell body (Bartlett et al., 2000; Huang and Winer, 2000; Llano and Sherman, 2008). Furthermore, these projections elicit postsynaptic responses consistent with a role as information-bearing pathways, i.e., large excitatory postsynaptic potentials that depress in response to repetitive stimulation and also lack a metabotropic glutamate receptor component (Bartlett and Smith, 2002; Rose and Metherate, 2005; Lee and Sherman, 2008, 2010a). In contrast, a second type of glutamatergic pathway has diametrically opposite characteristics. Morphologically, these pathways exhibit thin axons that terminate in small terminals and synapse distally on postsynaptic dendrites (Ojima, 1994; Prieto and Winer, 1999; Huang and Winer, 2000; Smith et al., 2007; Llano and Sherman, 2008). Physiologically, these pathways also differ, eliciting small excitatory postsynaptic potentials that facilitate in response to repetitive stimulation and that also activate postsynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors (Bartlett and Smith, 2002; Lee and Sherman, 2008, 2009, 2010a).

These characteristics apply broadly to glutamatergic pathways in the central auditory system, serving to distinguish pathways that are putatively information-bearing (the first type described above) from those that are modulatory (the second type described above) in nature [Figure 1]. For example, at the tectothalamic synapse, these criteria identify two distinct types of pathways originating from the inferior colliculus (Bartlett and Smith, 1999; Bartlett et al., 2000; Bartlett and Smith, 2002; Smith et al., 2007; Lee and Sherman, 2010a). The putative information-bearing route originates from the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICc) and terminates in the ventral division of the medial geniculate body (MGBv) (red pathways in [Figure 1]. In contrast, the surrounding nuclei, e.g., dorsal cortex (ICd) and lateral nucleus (ICl), send putative modulatory glutamatergic projections to the non-lemniscal nuclei of the medial geniculate body (MGBd and MGBm) (green pathways in [Figure 1]. Thus, we have suggested that these properties classify the lemniscal pathway from the ICc to the MGBv as the principal route for conveying information from the inferior colliculus to the medial geniculate body, rather than multiple parallel ascending pathways (Lee and Sherman, 2010a, 2011). Instead, in this framework, we suggest that the tectothalamic projections originating from the ICl and ICd to the MGBd and MGBm, respectively, serve a modulatory role, rather than a primarily information-bearing role (Bartlett and Smith, 2002; Hu, 2003; Smith et al., 2007; Lee and Sherman, 2010a).
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of glutamatergic pathways from the inferior colliculus, medial geniculate body and auditory cortex.
Pathways are classified on the basis of morphological and physiological cri­teria, which identify putative information-bearing (red) versus modulatory (green) pathways. These pathways are found bilaterally but are depicted in separate hemispheres for clarity. Portions of the figure adapted from (Pax­inos and Franklin, 2001).
Abbreviations: AI, primary auditory cortex; AII, secondary auditory cortex; D, dorsal division of the medial geniculate body (MGB); ICc, central nu­cleus of the inferior colliculus (IC); ICd, dorsal cortex of the IC; ICl, lateral nucleus of the IC; M, medial division of the MGB; V, ventral division of the MGB; 1-6, cortical layers 1-6.


Click here to view


At the auditory thalamocortical synapse, we posit that these criteria promote an even more intriguing theory. That is, we have found that the projections from higher-order thalamic nuclei, e.g. the dorsal division of the medial geniculate body (MGBd), are similar functionally to the projections from the first-order thalamic nucleus, i.e. the ventral division of the medial geniculate body (MGBv) (Lee and Sherman, 2008). Thus, both of these pathways from the thalamus exhibit morphological and physiological properties consistent with roles as information-bearing conduits to auditory cortical areas, i.e., the first type of glutamatergic pathway described above [Figure 1] (Huang and Winer, 2000; Rose and Metherate, 2005; Lee and Sherman, 2008; Smith et al., 2012), in contrast with the prevailing notion that the higher-order thalamocortical projections serve only a modulatory role (Olshausen et al., 1993).

The notion that the higher-order thalamocortical projections are similar functionally to the first-order thalamocortical projection raises an obvious question: what is the source of information being transferred from the higher-order auditory thalamus to the higher auditory cortical areas? As noted above, the inputs from the inferior colliculus to the higher-order thalamus (MGBd and MGBm) appear modulatory in nature (Bartlett et al., 2000; Bartlett and Smith, 2002; Lee and Sherman, 2010a). But, rather than promulgating information from the midbrain, the higher-order thalamic nuclei instead receive information from layer 5 of a lower cortical area, e.g., the layer 5 projection from the primary auditory cortex (AI) to MGBd [Figure 1]: red pathway from layer 5) (Ojima, 1994; Winer et al., 1999; Llano and Sherman, 2008). These feedforward corticothalamic projections from cortical layer 5 are distinct from the feedback corticothalamic projections from cortical layer 6, which exhibit properties associated with modulatory glutamatergic projections [Figure 1]: green pathways). This arrangement establishes an alternate route for communication between cortical areas via a cortico-thalamo-cortical route. In comparison to the direct corticocortical connections, e.g., the primary auditory cortex (AI) to the secondary auditory cortex (AII), the indirect route, AI to MGBd to AII, may utilize the unique functional properties of thalamic neurons, such as the tonic and burst firing modes (Sherman, 2001; Sherman and Guillery, 2011).

Although this classification of glutamatergic pathways yields new insights into the putative routes of information flow in the central auditory system, open questions remain. For instance, it remains to be determined how these synaptic properties apply to other glutamatergic synapses in the auditory system, such as the descending corticocollicular pathways (Feliciano and Potashner, 1995; Bajo and Moore, 2005; Bajo et al., 2010), which likely modulate ascending auditory information (Clarkson et al., 2012). Perhaps more intriguing is the issue of whether these two types of glutamatergic pathways exhibit different capacities for long-term plasticity. Indeed, the presumption a priori is that the putative information-bearing pathways should exhibit a greater resiliency to long-term plastic changes, such that their roles as high-fidelity conduits for auditory information are maintained (Lee and Sherman, 2011). Furthermore, the putative modulatory glutamatergic pathways, with their distal dendritic synaptic locations and activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors might be more ideally constructed to support sustained and longer-term alterations to synaptic strength and efficacy (Froemke et al., 2010; Sherman, 2014). Thus, the relative plasticity of these two types of glutamatergic pathways may inherently limit the regenerative capacity of various components in the auditory processing stream (Ruben, 1996). Consequently, regenerating or repairing damage to the central auditory pathways may benefit from targeting selected glutamatergic synaptic types (Lee et al., 2012, 2013).

Overall, the parcellation of glutamatergic pathways in the central auditory system is ongoing. The aforementioned characterization based on morphological properties and physiological responses establishes a few important metrics for comparison, which is admittedly incomplete and could be expanded to include a range of other synaptic components, such as the varied neurotransmitter transporter systems (Hackett et al., 2011; Storace et al., 2012). In this respect, the differential expression of vesicular glutamate transporter subtypes may further subdivide the classes of glutamatergic synapses describe here, as suggested by their expression in distinct glutamatergic pathways in the brainstem (Zhou et al., 2007), midbrain (Altschuler et al., 2008; Ito and Oliver, 2010), and forebrain (Hackett et al., 2011; Storace et al., 2012). Thus, the exploration and delineation of glutamatergic pathways in the central auditory system will continue to evolve and their subtle functional roles eventually revealed. [54]

 
  References Top

1.Altschuler RA, Tong L, Holt AG, Oliver DL (2008) Immunolocalization of vesicular glutamate transporters 1 and 2 in the rat inferior colliculus. Neuroscience 154:226-232.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Bajo VM, Moore DR (2005) Descending projections from the auditory cortex to the inferior colliculus in the gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. J Comp Neurol 486:101-116.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Bajo VM, Nodal FR, Bizley JK, King AJ (2010) The non-lemniscal auditory cortex in ferrets: convergence of corticotectal inputs in the superior colliculus. Front.Neuroanat. 4:18.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Bartlett EL, Smith PH (1999) Anatomic, intrinsic, and synaptic properties of dorsal and ventral division neurons in rat medial geniculate body. J Neurophysiol 81:1999-2013.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Bartlett EL, Smith PH (2002) Effects of paired-pulse and repetitive stimulation on neurons in the rat medial geniculate body. Neuroscience 113:957-974.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Bartlett EL, Stark JM, Guillery RW, Smith PH (2000) Comparison of the fine structure of cortical and collicular terminals in the rat medial geniculate body. Neuroscience 100:811-828.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Callan A, Callan DE, Ando H (2012) Neural correlates of sound externalization. Neuroimage 66C:22-27.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Callan DE, Tsytsarev V, Hanakawa T, Callan AM, Katsuhara M, Fukuyama H, Turner R (2006) Song and speech: brain regions involved with perception and covert production. Neuroimage 31:1327-1342.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Carrasco A, Lomber SG (2009) Evidence for hierarchical processing in cat auditory cortex: nonreciprocal influence of primary auditory cortex on the posterior auditory field. J Neurosci 29:14323-14333.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Caspary DM, Ling L, Turner JG, Hughes LF (2008) Inhibitory neurotransmission, plasticity and aging in the mammalian central auditory system. J Exp Biol 211:1781-1791.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Clarkson C, Herrero-Turrion MJ, Merchan MA (2012) Cortical auditory deafferentation induces long-term plasticity in the inferior colliculus of adult rats: Microarray and qPCR analysis. Front Neural Circuits 6:86.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Feliciano M, Potashner SJ (1995) Evidence for a glutamatergic pathway from the guinea pig auditory cortex to the inferior colliculus. J Neurochem 65:1348-1357.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC (1991) Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 1:1-47.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Froemke RC, Letzkus JJ, Kampa BM, Hang GB, Stuart GJ (2010) Dendritic synapse location and neocortical spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Front Synaptic Neurosci 2:29.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Hackett TA (2011) Information flow in the auditory cortical network. Hear Res 27:133-146.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Hackett TA, Takahata T, Balaram P (2011) VGLUT1 and VGLUT2 mRNA expression in the primate auditory pathway. Hear Res 274:129-141.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Hu B (2003) Functional organization of lemniscal and nonlemniscal auditory thalamus. Exp Brain Res 153:543-549.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Huang CL, Winer JA (2000) Auditory thalamocortical projections in the cat: laminar and areal patterns of input. J Comp Neurol 427:302-331.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Imaizumi K, Lee CC (2013) Auditory thalamo-cortical transformations. In: Encyclopedial of Computational Neuroscience (Jaeger D, Jung R, eds), Berlin Heidelberg:Springer Reference. DOI: 10.1007/SpringerReference_348167.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Ito T, Oliver DL (2010) Origins of glutamatergic terminals in the inferior colliculus identified by retrograde transport and expresión of VGLUT1and VGLUT2 genes. Front Neuroanat 4:135.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Kaas JH (2008) The evolution of the complex sensory and motor systems of the human brain. Brain Res Bull 75:384-390.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Lee CC, Imaizumi K (2013) Functional convergence of thalamic and intrinsic projections to cortical layers 4 and 6. Neurophysiology 45:396-406.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Lee CC, Lam YW, Imaizumi K, Sherman SM (2013) Laser-scanning photostimulation of optogenetically targeted forebrain circuits. J Vis Exp 82:e50915.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Lee CC, Lam YW, Sherman SM (2012) Intracortical convergence from layer 6 neurons. Neuroreport 23:736-740.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Lee CC, Sherman SM (2008) Synaptic properties of thalamic and intracortical intputs to layer 4 of the first- and higher-order cortical areas in the auditory and somatosensory systems. J Neurophysiol 100:317-326.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Lee CC, Sherman SM (2009) Modulator property of the intrinsic cortical projections from layer 6 to layer 4. Front Syst Neurosci 3:3.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Lee CC, Sherman SM (2010a) Topography and physiology of ascending streams in the auditory tectothalamic pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:372-377.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Lee CC, Sherman SM (2010b) Drivers and modulators in the central auditory pathways. Front Neurosci 4:79-86.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Lee CC, Sherman SM (2011) On the classification of pathways in the auditory midbrain, thalamus, and cortex. Hear Res 276:79-87.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Lee CC, Winer JA (2011) Convergence of thalamic and cortical pathways in cat auditory cortex. Hear Res 274:85-94.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Llano DA, Sherman SM (2008) Evidence for non-reciprocal organization of the mouse auditory thalamocortical-corticothalamic projections systems. J Comp Neurol 507:1209-1227.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Lo FS, Akkentli F, Tsytsarev V, Erzurumlu RS (2013) Functional significance of cortical NMDA receptors in somatosensory information processing. J Neurophysiol 110:2627-2636.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Ojima H (1994) Terminal morphology and distribution of corticothalamic fibers originating from layers 5 and 6 of cat primary auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 4:646-663.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Olshausen BA, Anderson CH, Van Essen DC (1993) A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. J Neurosci 16:1180-1192.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ (2001) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Prieto JJ, Winer JA (1999) Layer VI in cat primary auditory cortex: Golgi study and sublaminar origins of projection neurons. J Comp Neurol 404.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Razak KA, Fuzessery ZM (2010) Development of parallel auditory thalamo- cortical pathways for two different behaviors. Front Neuroanat 4:34.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Reichova I, Sherman SM (2004) Somatosensory corticothalamic projections: distinguishing drivers from modulators. J Neurophysiol 92:2185-2197.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Romanski LM, Tian B, Fritz J, Mishkin M, Goldman-Rakic PS, Rauschecker JP (1999) Dual streams of auditory afferents target multiple domains in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 2:1131-1136.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.Rose HJ, Metherate R (2005) Auditory thalamocortical transmission is reliable and temporally precise. J Neurophysiol 94:2019-2030.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.Ruben RJ (1996) Auditory repair, regeneration, toughening and plasticity: a clinical perspective. In: Auditory system plasticity and regeneration (Salvi RJ, Henderson D, Fiorino F, Colletti V, eds). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.Sherman SM (2001) Tonic and burst firing: dual modes of thalamocortical relay. Trends Neurosci 24:122-126.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.Sherman SM (2014) The function of metabotropic glutamate receptors in thalamus and cortex. Neuroscientist 20:136-149.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.Sherman SM, Guillery RW (2011) Distinct functions for direct and transthalamic corticocortical connections. J Neurophysiol 106:1068-1077.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.Smith PH, Bartlett EL, Kowalkowski A (2007) Cortical and collicular inputs to cells in the rat paralaminar thalamic nuclei adjacent to the medial geniculate body. J Neurophysiol 98:681-695.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.Smith PH, Uhlrich DJ, Manning KA, Banks MI (2012) Thalamocortical projections to rat auditory cortex from the ventral and dorsal divisions of the medial geniculate nucleus. J Comp Neurol 520:34-51.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.Storace DA, Higgins NC, Chikar JA, Oliver DL, Read HL (2012) Gene expression identifies distinct ascending glutamatergic pathways to frequency-organized auditory cortex in the rat brain. J Neurosci 32:15759-15768.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.Tanaka S, Miyashita M (2009) Constraint on the number of synaptic inputs to a visual cortical neuron controls receptive field formation. Neural Comput 21:2554-2880.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.Tsytsarev V, Fukuyama H, Pope D, Pumbo E, Kimura M (2009) Optical imaging of interaural time difference representation in rat auditory cortex. Front Neuroeng 2:2.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.Wenstrup JJ (2005) The Tectothalamic System. In: The Inferior Colliculus (Winer JA, Schreiner CE, eds), pp 200-230. New York: Springer.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.Winer JA, Larue DT, Huang CL (1999) Two systems of giant axons terminals in the cat medial geniculate body: convergence of cortical and GABAergic inputs. J Comp Neurol 413:181-197.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.Winer JA, Saint Marie RL, Larue DT, Oliver DL (1996) GABAergic feedforward projections from the inferior colliculus to the medial geniculate body. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:8005-8010.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.Winer JA, Miller LM, Lee CC, Schreiner CE (2005) Auditory thalamocortical transformation: structure and function. Trends Neurosci 28:255-263.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.Zhou J, Nannapaneni N, Shore S (2007) Vesicular glutamate transporters 1 and 2 are differentially associated with auditory nerve and spinal trigeminal inputs to the cochlear nucleus. J Comp Neurol 500:777-787.  Back to cited text no. 54
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Frequency transformation in the auditory lemniscal thalamocortical system
Kazuo Imaizumi,Charles C. Lee
Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 2014; 8
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2158    
    Printed32    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded269    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]