• Users Online: 263
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
HIGHLIGHTS
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 10  |  Page : 1555-1557

Regulation of axonal remodeling following spinal cord injury


1 Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany
2 Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Munich; Munich Cluster of Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany

Date of Acceptance16-Sep-2015
Date of Web Publication30-Oct-2015

Correspondence Address:
Florence M Bareyre
Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Munich; Munich Cluster of Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich
Germany
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.167748

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Jacobi A, Bareyre FM. Regulation of axonal remodeling following spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res 2015;10:1555-7

How to cite this URL:
Jacobi A, Bareyre FM. Regulation of axonal remodeling following spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Apr 12];10:1555-7. Available from: http://www.nrronline.org/text.asp?2015/10/10/1555/167748

Central nervous system injuries, such as spinal cord injury (SCI), are a leading cause of disability in young adults. SCIs generally have severe clinical consequences and often lead to loss of motor or sensory input below the segment of injury. While complete injuries generally show very little improvement over time, functional recovery can be seen following partial injuries. A number of studies over the last decade have aimed to identify the anatomical basis of this recovery process. They showed that while long-distance axonal regeneration is restricted in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS), supraspinal and intraspinal CNS axons can remodel after injury (Weidner et al., 2001; Bareyre et al., 2004; Girgis et al., 2007; van den Brand et al., 2012; Zörner et al., 2014).

The potential of axons to remodel following CNS injury has been studied for several axonal tract systems including the corticospinal tract (CST), an important descending motor pathway. It could for example be shown that a complete transection of the main dorsal corticospinal pathway triggers sprouting of the minor CST components: for instance, sprouting of the ventral corticospinal tract that is associated with functional recovery (Weidner et al., 2001) as well as sprouting of the dorsolateral corticospinal tract (Bareyre et al., 2005). Fouad and collaborators (2001) further demonstrated that a thoracic hemisection that interrupts the main hindlimb dorsal and dorsolateral components of the corticospinal tract triggers sprouting of dorsal corticospinal collaterals into the cervical spinal cord, remotely from the level of injury. Subsequent studies showed that this newly sprouted collaterals were able to contact spinal relay neurons, such as propriospinal neurons (PSNs) located in the intermediate and ventral laminae of the cervical spinal cord ([Figure 1]A; Bareyre et al., 2004; Lang et al., 2012). Two populations of propriospinal relay neurons were examined more closely in these studies: Short propriospinal neurons (SPSNs), which are important for visually-guided target reaching and project from cervical to upper thoracic segments and long propriospinal neurons (LPSNs), which project in the ventral funiculus from cervical to lumbar segments and are important for the coupling of the hindlimb and forelimb movements. Importantly the long propriospinal pathway, due to its ventral localization is spared in classical thoracic hemisection models. While early following SCI, both populations of relay neurons are contacted by new hindlimb CST collaterals in the cervical cord, refinement of the contacts takes place over time and many contacts onto short propriospinal neurons are eliminated. In the meanwhile, contacts onto long propriospinal neurons are maintained and these neurons in turn increased their synaptic contacts onto lumbar motoneurons, the initial targets of the dorsal hindlimb CST. This remodeling that takes place at multiple spinal levels thus leads to the formation of an intraspinal detour circuit that allows bypassing the lesion site and contributes at least partially to the functional recovery that is seen after SCI in rodents ([Figure 1]A; Bareyre et al., 2004; Lang et al., 2012). In recent years, additional examples of supraspinal and intraspinal remodeling processes involving different axonal track systems and different injury paradigms have been reported (Courtine et al., 2008; Filli et al., 2014) indicating that axonal remodeling is a more general hallmark of the adaptive response to CNS injuries. While the importance of such circuit remodeling for functional recovery is now well established (van den Brand et al., 2012), the molecular regulation of the different steps of the remodeling is much less understood.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the formation and the regulation of intraspinal detour circuits following spinal cord injury.
(A) Intraspinal detour circuit formation: Following thoracic hemisection, the hindlimb corticospinal tract sprouts collaterals into the cervical spinal cord. Those collaterals form synapses with long proprio­spinal neurons which in turn increase their contacts onto lumbar motoneurons thereby forming a new detour pathway that reconnects upper corticospinal projection neurons to lumbar motoneurons.
(B) Effect of STAT3 overexpression on post-injury detour circuit formation (top panel) and post-inju­ry compensatory midline sprouting fibers (bottom panel). Following thoracic hemisection and STAT3 overexpression using recombinant adeno-associat­ed viruses (top panel), the hindlimb corticospinal tract sprouts more collaterals than in the control situation. Furthermore, following a unilateral lesion of the corticospinal tract at the level of the medulla oblongata, and STAT3 overexpression using recom­binant adeno-associated viruses (bottom panel), midline crossing fibers emerge from the treated unlesioned corticospinal tract and re-innervate the denervated cervical spinal cord.
(C) Perturbation of FGF22 signalling, using geneti­cally deficient animals, decreases synapse formation and maturation during post-injury detour circuit formation. In turn this impairment in synapse formation triggers a decreased formation of detour circuits and leads to impairment functional recov­ery following spinal cord injury. This indicates that intact FGF22 signaling is an important requirement for efficient intraspinal axonal remodeling.


Click here to view


In general, the formation of detour circuits - as described above - can be divided into two steps, and both need to be accomplished to successfully bypass the injury and trigger recovery. First, the transected neurons need to induce the growth of new axon collaterals within the intraspinal architecture. Second these new collaterals need to form and maintain functional synapses onto appropriate interneuronal populations in order to ensure the transmission of neural signals from the upper motoneurons in the brain to the lower spinal motoneurons. Recent studies that shed light on the molecular regulation of these steps of the axonal remodeling process are summarized in the next paragraphs.

Growth of axonal collaterals during injury-induced axonal remodeling: the role of STAT3: In recent years, several molecules have been discovered that regulate the intrinsic growth program of neurons in the central or peripheral nervous system (Liu et al., 2011; Chen and Zheng, 2014). One key component of this intrinsic growth program is the transcription factor STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), which can be activated as part of the JAK-STAT transduction pathway. Several recent papers have demonstrated the importance of the JAK-STAT pathway in promoting axon growth after injury (Qiu et al., 2005; Smith et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2011). Using dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons that extend one branch to the central and another to the peripheral nervous system we could for example reveal the contribution of STAT3 to the differential injury response in the PNS and CNS (Bareyre et al., 2011). In this study, we showed that PNS but not CNS lesions lead to the persistent upregulation of STAT3 expression in DRG neurons. This differential expression is important as STAT3 deletion in DRG neurons impaired the regeneration of peripheral DRG branches after nerve cut, while the overexpression of STAT3 using gene therapy increased outgrowth and collateral sprouting of central DRG branches after a dorsal column lesion. Time-lapse in vivo imaging of PNS and CNS axons further revealed that STAT3 selectively regulates initiation but not later perpetuation of axonal growth. These findings raised the question whether STAT3 could also be a good candidate to modulate post-injury axonal remodeling. To test this, we overexpressed STAT3 in the cells of origin of the CST in the motor cortex using viral gene transfer and analyzed the effect of this overexpression on post-injury outgrowth of hindlimb CST collaterals in the cervical cord (Lang et al., 2013). The study shows that STAT3 overexpression increases the number of newly sprouted collaterals from the injured hindlimb CST after thoracic hemisection ([Figure 1]B upper panel). To our surprise, it also showed that even in absence of a lesion, STAT3 can induce the growth of de novo collaterals into the cervical spinal cord. This indicates that STAT3 can not only (moderately) promote the growth of injured fibers but also initiate the growth process in uninjured fibers. To better understand whether the growth of uninjured fibers could contribute to recovery, we unilaterally cut the CST at the pyramidal decussation (pyramidotomy) and overexpressed STAT3 in layer V projection neurons of the unlesioned CST. In this paradigm, STAT3 induces the sprouting of unlesioned forelimb CST fibers in the cervical spinal cord. These fibers cross the spinal midline and form contacts onto spinal interneurons and cervical motoneurons on the denervated side - a remodeling process that improves forelimb function as assessed both behaviorally and electrophysiologically ([Figure 1]B lower panel; Lang et al., 2013). STAT3 is thus a key modulator of the initial phase of the remodeling process that can "jump-start" axonal growth and thereby recruit both injured and uninjured fibers to the remodeling process. Interestingly, Tsuda et al. (2011) also reported that the JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway critically regulates astrocyte proliferation and neuropathic pain following nerve injury which highlights that STAT3 might be an interesting therapeutic target not only to induce axonal growth but also reduce allodynia following spinal cord injury.

Induction of synapse formation during injury-induced axonal remodeling: the role of FGF22: The second important step during detour circuit formation is the establishment of new synaptic contacts between CST collaterals that enter the cervical grey matter and the appropriate target cell in the spinal grey matter, e.g., the long propriospinal neurons. A number of the molecules that induce and maintain synapse formation have been elucidated in the developing nervous system. One of the more recently identified molecules is a member of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family, FGF22 and its receptors, FGFR1 and FGFR2 (Umemori et al., 2004). Several studies have shown its importance for the induction of excitatory presynaptic differentiation during development, i.e., in the cerebellum or in the hippocampus and suggested its involvement in neurological diseases such as epilepsy. To investigate whether FGF22 signaling could also regulate synapse formation during post injury remodeling in the adult CNS, we genetically deleted FGF22 or its receptors (Jacobi et al., 2015). Mice deficient for FGF22 or lacking both of its receptors in corticospinal projection neurons showed a significant decrease in the number of synaptic boutons formed on the newly sprouted CST collaterals in the cervical spinal cord following SCI ([Figure 1]C). Moreover the maturation of those synapses that formed was significantly delayed. Together these changes in synapse formation and maturation led to impaired detour circuit formation and delayed functional recovery of the animals following SCI. Indeed motor performance after SCI, evaluated using behavioral tasks such as the ladder rung test - in which the animals have to walk over a ladder with bars regularly and irregularly spaced - or the catwalk system - in which the fine stepping movements of the animals are recorded and analyzed - was significantly worse in mice in which FGF22 signaling was genetically interrupted. These data identify FGF22 and its receptors as crucial endogenous regulators of the formation and maturation of new synapses in the injured central nervous system that are required for efficient post-injury remodeling and recovery.

Timely and accurate axonal remodeling is one of the keys to functional recovery following spinal cord injury. To therapeutically support such remodeling processes in the future we first have to unravel the molecular signals that govern their endogenous formation. Recent studies such as the ones described here identify first molecular clues but much more work is required to obtain a comprehensive molecular understanding of circuit remodeling in the injured spinal cord.

Work in FMB laboratory is supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, SFB870) and by the Munich Center for System Neurology (SyNergy, EXC1010). The authors thank Martin Kerschensteiner for critically reading the paper.[20]

 
  References Top

1.
Bareyre FM, Kerschensteiner M, Misgeld T, Sanes JR (2005) Transgenic labeling of the corticospinal tract for monitoring axonal responses to spinal cord injury. Nat Med 11:1355-1360.   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Bareyre FM, Kerschensteiner M, Raineteau O, Mettenleiter TC, Weinmann O, Schwab ME (2004) The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats. Nat Neurosci 7:269-277.   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bareyre FM, Garzorz N, Lang C, Misgeld T, Büning H, Kerschensteiner M (2011) In vivo imaging reveals a phase-specific role of STAT3 during central and peripheral nervous system axon regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:6282-6287.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Chen M, Zheng B (2014) Axon plasticity in the mammalian central nervous system after injury. Trends Neurosci 37:583-593.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Courtine G, Song B, Roy RR, Zhong H, Herrmann JE, Ao Y, Qi J, Edgerton VR, Sofroniew MV (2008) Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury. Nat Med 14:69-74.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Filli L, Engmann AK, Zörner B, Weinmann O, Moraitis T, Gullo M, Kasper H, Schneider R, Schwab ME (2014) Bridging the gap: a reticulo-propriospinal detour bypassing an incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 34:13399-13410.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Fouad K, Pedersen V, Schwab ME, Brösamle C (2001) Cervical sprouting of corticospinal fibers after thoracic spinal cord injury accompanies shifts in evoked motor responses. Curr Biol 11:1766-1770.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Girgis J, Merrett D, Kirkland S, Metz GA, Verge V, Fouad K (2007) Reaching training in rats with spinal cord injury promotes plasticity and task specific recovery. Brain 130:2993-3003.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Jacobi A, Loy K, Schmalz AM, Hellsten M, Umemori H, Kerschensteiner M, Bareyre FM (2015) FGF22 signaling regulates synapse formation during post-injury remodeling of the spinal cord. EMBO J 34:1231-1243.   Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lang C, Guo X, Kerschensteiner M, Bareyre FM (2012) Single collateral reconstructions reveal distinct phases of corticospinal remodeling after spinal cord injury. PLoS One 7:e30461.   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Lang C, Bradley PM, Jacobi A, Kerschensteiner M, Bareyre FM (2013) STAT3 promotes corticospinal remodelling and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. EMBO Rep 14:931-937.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Liu K, Tedeschi A, Park KK, He Z (2011) Neuronal intrinsic mechanisms of axon regeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci 34:131-152.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Qiu J, Cafferty WBJ, McMahon SB, Thompson SWN (2005) Conditioning injury-induced spinal axon regeneration requires signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation. J Neurosci 25:1645-1653.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Smith PD, Sun F, Park KK, Cai B, Wang C, Kuwako K, Martinez-Carrasco I, Connolly L, He Z (2009) SOCS3 deletion promotes optic nerve regeneration in vivo. Neuron 64:617-623.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Sun F, Park KK, Belin S, Wang D, Lu T, Chen G, Zhang K, Yeung C, Feng G, Yankner BA, He Z (2011) Sustained axon regeneration induced by co-deletion of PTEN and SOCS3. Nature 480:372-375.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tsuda M, Kohro Y, Yano T, Tsujikawa T, Kitano J, Tozaki-Saitoh H, Koyanagi S, Ohdo S, Ji RR, Salter MW, Inoue K (2011) JAK-STAT3 pathway regulates spinal astrocyte proliferation and neuropathic pain maintenance in rats. Brain 134:1127-1139.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Umemori H, Linhoff MW, Ornitz DM, Sanes JR (2004) FGF22 and its close relatives are presynaptic organizing molecules in the mammalian brain. Cell 118:257-70.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
van den Brand R, Heutschi J, Barraud Q, DiGiovanna J, Bartholdi K, Huerlimann M, Friedli L, Vollenweider I, Moraud EM, Duis S, Dominici N, Micera S, Musienko P, Courtine G (2012) Restoring voluntary control of locomotion after paralyzing spinal cord injury. Science 336:1182-1185.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Weidner N, Ner A, Salimi N, Tuszynski MH (2001) Spontaneous corticospinal axonal plasticity and functional recovery after adult central nervous system injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:3513-3518.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Zörner B, Bachmann LC, Filli L, Kapitza S, Gullo M, Bolliger M, Starkey ML, Röthlisberger M, Gonzenbach RR, Schwab ME (2014) Chasing central nervous system plasticity: the brainstem′s contribution to locomotor recovery in rats with spinal cord injury. Brain 137:1716-1732.  Back to cited text no. 20
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1450    
    Printed19    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded493    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]