|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 11 | Page : 1911-1917
Evaluation of sensory function and recovery after replantation of fingertips at Zone I in children
Zhao-wei Zhu1, Xiao-yan Zou2, Yong-jun Huang3, Jiang-hui Liu4, Xi-jun Huang5, Bo He M.D., Ph.D. 5
, Zeng-tao Wang6
1 Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province; Department of Orthopedics and Microsurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
2 Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
3 Department of Orthopedics, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
4 Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
5 Department of Orthopedics and Microsurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
6 Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
|Date of Acceptance||15-Sep-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||6-Dec-2017|
Department of Orthopedics and Microsurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province
Source of Support: This study was supported by a grant from the Department of Health of Guangdong Province of China, No. A2016018; the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education, No. 20120171120075; a grant from the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province of China, No. 2014A020212479; a grant from the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou City of China, No. 201300000174; a grant from the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province of China, No. 2016A010103012; a grant from the Doctoral Start-up Project of the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China, No. 2017A030310302., Conflict of Interest: None
Sensory function is the most significant criterion when evaluating the prognosis of replanted fingers. Current clinical research has focused on surgical techniques and indications for finger replantation; however, few studies have focused on recovery of finger sensory function after replantation. This study retrospectively assessed data of eight patients who had undergone nine Zone I replantations of the fingertips in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University of China from July 2014 to January 2016. Variations in the extent of damage, with the residual vessels or nerves in some fingers being too short or even missing, prevented tension-free suture repair in some patients. Thus, repair of four of the nine fingertips included arteriovenous anastomosis, the remaining five undergoing arterial anastomosis during replantation of the amputated fingers. Three patients underwent nerve repair, whereas the remaining six cases did not. Fingertip replantations were successful in all eight patients. Compared with the patients without vascular anastomosis, no obvious atrophy was visible in the fingertips of patients who did undergo vascular anastomosis during replantation and their sensory function did recover. Fingertip replantation provides good sensory function and cosmetic outcomes when good artery and vein anastomoses have been created, even when digital nerves have not been repaired.
Keywords: nerve regeneration; fingertip replantation; neurological function; microsurgery; hand surgery; anatomy; plastic surgery; blood vessels; neural regeneration
|How to cite this article:|
Zhu Zw, Zou Xy, Huang Yj, Liu Jh, Huang Xj, He B, Wang Zt. Evaluation of sensory function and recovery after replantation of fingertips at Zone I in children. Neural Regen Res 2017;12:1911-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Zhu Zw, Zou Xy, Huang Yj, Liu Jh, Huang Xj, He B, Wang Zt. Evaluation of sensory function and recovery after replantation of fingertips at Zone I in children. Neural Regen Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Oct 17];12:1911-7. Available from: http://www.nrronline.org/text.asp?2017/12/11/1911/219053
Zhao-wei Zhu, Xiao-yan Zou
These authors contributed equally to this study
| Introduction|| |
Komatsu et al. and Tamai et al. reported the first successful digital replantation in 1965 (Masuhara et al., 1967; Komatsu and Tamai, 1968). Over the past 50 years, the limits of digital replantation have been extended by improved instrumentation and establishment of more methodical approaches to teaching microsurgical techniques (Dadaci et al., 2016; Idrissi et al., 2016; Wen et al., 2017). Recent studies have shown high survival rates and excellent functional and aesthetic results. Thus, when managing distal digit injury, most doctors prefer replantation to direct closure or flap transfer (Jazayeri et al., 2013). The survival rate is reportedly 93.3% (Lima et al., 2015; Brown et al., 2017). The replantation procedure represents the pinnacle in the field of hand surgery because the decision to replant a severed part is influenced by many factors, including the importance of the part, the severity of the injury, the expected recovery of function, and the mechanism of injury (Yu et al., 2015). Of these factors, the severity of injury is the most important in determining survival of the replanted digit (Ma et al., 2016). The anatomical structures involved in amputated finger are important in determining the digital replantation strategy. Different sections of human fingers have different anatomical structures and characteristics. To aid in the analysis and study of digital replantation, each digit is divided into six zones on the basis of anatomical details and clinical considerations. Zones I, III, and V involve the bony segments, whereas Zones II, IV, and VI involve the joints of the hand [Figure 1] (Ding and Wang, 2007; Zhu, 2008). Zone I is defined as the fingertip region beyond the proximal 1/5 of the distal phalanx including Zone Ia, which involves the region beyond 1/2 of the distal phalanx, and Zone Ib, which includes the region from the proximal 1/5 to 1/2 of the distal phalanx. Zone Ib harbors the volar digital arteries on the side of the phalanx and the matrix of the fingernail on its back.
|Figure 1: Surgical zones of the fingertip.|
On the basis of anatomical features and clinical considerations, each digit is divided into six zones to aid in the analysis and study of digital replantation. Zones I, III, and V include the bony segments, whereas Zones II, IV, and VI include the joints of the hand (Zhu, 2008).
Click here to view
Surgical technique and indications for finger replantation have been discussed (De Frenne and Dhooghe, 1983; Barbary et al., 2013; Engdahl and Morrison, 2015); however, few researchers have focused on cosmetic outcomes and sensory function after replantation of fingers. In this study, the surgical zones of the fingertip (Zone Ia and Zone Ib) were discussed. The aim of this study was to evaluate cosmetic outcomes and sensory function after fingertip replantations at or distal to the nail base and to evaluate the clinical outcomes.
| Subjects and Methods|| |
From July 2014 to August 2015, eight patients (average age, 6.8 years; range, 2–18 years) were included in this study. Patients were included if they met the following criteria: (1) age < 18 years; (2) complete amputation of fingertip; (3) duration of injury < 8 hours; and (4) provision of informed consent by the patient's legal guardians. Exclusion criteria were: (1) age > 18 years; (2) incomplete amputations of fingertips; (3) duration of injury > 8 hours; and (4) inability to comply with treatment, postoperative rehabilitation and follow-up. The eight patients underwent a total of nine Zone I replantations of the fingertip (five boys with six replantations and three girls with one replantation each). Eight amputations were caused by crushing or crushing–avulsion and one by cutting. All injuries were complete amputations involving two thumbs, four index fingers, one middle finger, and two ring fingers. The replantation surgeries were all carried out within 8 hours of injury. The average duration of follow-up period was 9.3 ± 3.5 months (range, 6–15 months).
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University of China (Approval No. (2009)99). Written informed consent was provided by the patients or their legal guardians prior to their participation in the study.
Careful debridement of the amputated digit was performed under general anesthesia and with microscopic guidance (magnification of 25× to 30×). The neurovascular bundle was dissected to locate an available vessel in the proximal stump and one artery in the distal stump was identified and tagged for later anastomosis. The bone ends were shortened slightly, or left intact in cases of clean-cut amputations, and the bony fragments fixed with a 5-mL syringe needle (Shanghai Kindly Enterprise Development Group, Shanghai, China) or Kirschner Wire (Yutong Medical Instrument Company, Tianjin, China). Stabilization was achieved by directly suturing the skin where the amputated fingers had very small bone fragments. The selected artery was anastomosed using a 12-0 nylon suture. The vein was also anastomosed with a 12-0 nylon suture (Crownjun KONO, Tokyo, Japan) if a vein had been identified. Otherwise, a fish-mouth incision, either at the pulp tip or opposite to the artery repair side of the pulp, was made to enable controlled bleeding to relive venous congestion.
If possible, neurorrhaphy was performed using one to two sutures. The skin was closed using 5-0 nylon. Heparin (Wanbang Biochemical Pharmaceutical, Jiangsu, China) was continually administered intravenously (6250 IU every 24 hours) for ~3–5 days. After skin closure and wound dressing, a dorsal long-arm splint was used to immobilize the affected extremity.
Finger atrophy was evaluated on the basis of the fullness of the injured finger pulp by comparing the appearance of the pulp with that of the contralateral uninjured finger. Finger atrophy was defined as less pulp in the replanted fingertip than the healthy side according to naked eye observation. JHL and YJH were responsible for follow-up of patients.
Evaluation of sensory function
Evaluation of sensory functional included static two-point discrimination (s2PD) tests, which were performed using a Touch-TestTM Two-Point Discriminator (Alimed, Dedham, MA, USA), and Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofilament examination by a Touch-Test™ Sensory Evaluator (Alimed) (with specifications such as 6.65, 4.56, 4.31, 3.61, and 2.83) (He et al., 2015; Murphy et al., 2017). The evaluation criteria for SW and s2PD used to interpret sensory recovery are shown in [Table 1] and [Table 2], respectively. s2PD was defined as: excellent, ≤ 6 mm; good, 7–15 mm; and poor, ≥ 16 mm (Weber et al., 2000; Meek, 2001; He et al., 2015; Murphy et al., 2017).
|Table 1: Interpretation of monofilament testing of pressure threshold (Weinstein, 1993)|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Classification of sensory recovery assessed by static 2-point discrimination (s2PD) test (Glickman and Mackinnon, 1990)|
Click here to view
Measurement data are presented as mean values. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Comparisons were performed using the chi-square test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to denote statistical significance.
| Results|| |
Survival rate and functional evaluation
Because the amputated fingertips had been subjected to different severities of trauma, some veins or nerves were either too short or lost to allow repair. Therefore, four of nine fingertips were repaired with vein anastomosis; nerve repair was also performed in three of these. All nine fingertip replantations in the eight patients were successful. All patients reported satisfactory return of sensation based on monofilament examination. In addition, patients 1, 2, and 5 achieved excellent outcomes based on s2PD tests on each finger. The remaining patients were too young to undergo the s2PD sensation test and thus did not undergo this assessment. The results of s2PD and SW monofilament testing are shown in [Table 3].
|Table 3: Sensory recovery by s2PD and SW monofilament testing at the last follow-up|
Click here to view
Evaluation of cosmetic outcomes
Compared with fingertips without post-injury vein anastomoses (n = 5), replantations reconstructed with such anastomoses (n = 4) showed no obvious atrophy. The difference between these two groups was significant according to the chi-square test (P < 0.05). Two of the four fingertips without vein repair had obvious atrophy. Venous drainage was constructed in three of them to improve blood circulation. However, the fourth had no suitable vein for repair because of the severity of the injury, which was a deep longitudinal cleft in the amputated fingertip. In this case, blood supply we re-established on the radial side. Three months after surgery, the blood circulation of the whole fingertip was adequate. However, the ulnar side of the tip had an insufficient blood supply, resulting in inevitable atrophy of this part. However, the chi-square test showed no significant differences in SW scores between fingertips with (n = 3) or without (n = 6) nerve repair (P > 0.05). Thus, whether or not nerves were repaired, there was satisfactory recovery of sensation according to SW monofilament examination in all replanted fingertips.
Case 1: A 2-year-old boy (No. 7 in [Table 3]) presented with a twisting injury to the right hand caused by a wheeled machine, resulting in complete amputation at Zone Ib of the index finger. There was rupture of the extensor tendons of the middle finger and a laceration on the dorsal surface of the ring finger and the wound was severely contaminated with machine oil. After thorough debridement, the amputated fingertip was reduced to Zone Ia. An artery distal to the arterial arch of the distal phalanx and one vein were anastomosed to the index finger using 12-0 non-absorbable sutures. A plastic strip [Figure 2]E, [Figure 2]F was placed on the anastomosed site. In addition, the extensor tendon rupture of the middle finger was repaired, and the ring finger debrided and stitches inserted [Figure 2]. Six months after the procedure, the repaired finger looked good, its pulp lacking any obvious atrophy. The s2PD test showed 5-mm when the SW test result was 2.83.
|Figure 2: A 2-year-old boy presented with a twisting injury of the right hand caused by a wheeled machine, resulting in complete amputation at Zone Ib of the index finger.|
(A) Pre-replantation, ventral view; (B) pre-replantation, dorsal view; (C) ventral view of amputated index; (D) dorsal view of amputated index; (E) post-replantation, ventral view; (F) post-replantation, dorsal view; (G) ventral view six months post-replantation; (H) dorsal view six months post-replantation.
Click here to view
Case 2: A 14-year-old boy (No. 8 in [Table 3]) presented with an injured left hand caused by a cutting machine, the fingertips of the index and ring fingers having been completely amputated. The wound was contaminated with dark cotton-like fabric and a small amount of an oily substance. After thorough debridement, a single artery distal to the arterial arch of index finger was anastomosed, and one artery distal to the arterial arch and one vein were anastomosed in the ring finger using 12-0 non-absorbable sutures [Figure 3]. Six months postoperatively, the pulp of the index finger had atrophied whereas the pulp of the ring finger looked good. s2PD tests of the second and fourth fingers were 8 mm and 7 mm, respectively and SW test results were 3.61 and 2.83, respectively.
|Figure 3: A 14-year-old boy presented with an injured left hand caused by a cutting machine, resulting in amputation of the index and ring fingertips at Zone Ia.|
(A) Dorsal view of amputated index fingertip; (B) X-ray film of left hand; (C) dorsal view of left hand 5 months post-operation; (D) ventral view of left hand 5 months post-operation. [Table 2] Classification of sensory recovery assessed by static 2-point discrimination (s2PD) test (Glickman and Mackinnon, 1990)
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Reconstruction of the fingertip distal to the flexor tendon insertion by replantation remains controversial and technically challenging although the anatomy of the fingertip has been well-described for surgical planning purposes (Dadaci et al., 2015; Butler et al., 2016; Regmi et al., 2016).
The digital arteries anastomose as palmar arches three times and at least three vessels then radiate longitudinally out from the rounded distal transverse palmar arch to supply the pulp, the central vessel usually having the largest caliber (Scheker and Becker, 2011; Wang et al., 2014). Scholars have classified fingertip injuries into two zones (Yamano, 1985; Kim et al., 2013): (1) the terminal branches from the arcade being classified as Zone I vessels; and (2) Zone II starting proximal to Zone I and continuing to the distal interphalangeal joint. In contrast, Ishikawa et al. (1990) have divided the distal phalanx into four zones.
Although the above classifications have previously been widely used, they have some limitations. The classification by Yamano (1985) and Kim et al. (2013) focuses primarily on arterial damage in a specific plane without considering the level of damage to other severed structures such as the bones and joints. When digital amputations involve a joint structure, there is often poor functional recovery of the severed joint. We consider that Ishikawa et al.'s classification (1990) is overly detailed. Therefore, we here propose a classification based on the amputation level that takes whether the injury involved the finger joints into consideration. On the basis of the anatomical features of the severed fingers, we divide the digits into six zones, Zones I, III, and V including the phalanges and Zones II, IV, and VI including the digital joints. Because Zone I harbors the distal arterial arch, we have further classified it into Zone Ib, which includes the distal arterial arch and the fingernail matrix, and Zone Ia, which begins at a point beyond the distal arterial arch. The surgical strategies and requirements for vascular anastomosis different between Zones Ia and Ib because the arterial arches in Zone Ib are of significantly greater diameter than those of the radiating branches in Zone Ia.
As the digital arteries divide at the level of the distal transverse palmar arch, they inevitably decrease in size from approximately 0.8 mm to as small as 0.3 mm in the radiating branches (Ishikawa et al., 1990; Barbary et al., 2013; Epameinondas et al., 2016). For the same reason, within Zone VI the common palmar digital artery splits into two proper palmar digital arteries at the metacarpophalangeal junction. This is subclassified as Zones VIa and VIb on the basis of the vascular anatomy, which for Zone VIa includes the common palmar digital artery at the metacarpophalangeal junction, and for Zone VIb the dorsal branch of the proximal phalanges.
As previously mentioned, Yamano's classification of finger amputation (1985) does not consider the impact of damage involving the interphalangeal joints, whereas Ishikawa et al.'s classifications (1990) and the similar one of Park et al. (2013) contain excessive detail of little clinical relevance. Our schema provides a digital amputation classification based on the level and extent of digital injury and can facilitate consideration of the options for phase II digital replantation.
Elsewhere, we have presented our approach to restoring a cosmetically pleasing appearance of the reconstructed thumbs or fingers while preserving the function and cosmetic appearance of the donor foot, including detailed discussion of the reconstructive procedures for each degree of digit defect and pitfalls and technical tips (Wang and Sun, 2014; Sun et al., 2015; Balan, 2016).
The most important factor in determining the stratagem for digital replantation surgery is reconstruction and recovery of normal blood circulation in the replanted fingertip (Fakin et al., 2015; Kim and Lee, 2015; Saha et al., 2015; Efanov et al., 2016). Unfortunately, the relevant venous anatomy is variable. At the level of the eponychium, 63% of fingers have a vein measuring at least 0.8 mm; however, the location of these veins is unpredictable (Scheker and Becker, 2011).
Various methods have been described for maintaining blood flow until internal circulation is achieved when an adequate venous anastomosis cannot be constructed (Chen et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2014; Streit et al., 2014; Huan et al., 2016). Anastomosis of a single artery in a digit will not provide adequate resumption of the fingertips. However, the procedure may still be successful if the problem of venous return is solved. When venous anastomoses cannot be constructed, close postoperative monitoring of the replanted digit for adequate circulation is essential (Sunil, 2006; Beris et al., 2010; Nazerani et al., 2011; Cigna et al., 2015). Our team adopts an adjunct treatment involving venous drainage from the nail bed or by fingertip incision (Hirase, 1997; Yabe et al., 2001; Jeon et al., 2016). In addition, we routinely introduce a plastic strip at the anastomosed sites that has the functions of (1) readily allowing venous drainage and thus reducing the risk of excessive pressure at the anastomosed site as a result of edema; and (2) because the wound is typically covered with a blood clot 2–3 days post-digital replantation, a small fraction of the strip can be withdrawn each day to induce bleeding and achieve a similar effect as venous drainage. We did not perform manual venous drainage by fingertip incision in Patient 1; rather, successful replantation was achieved by using a plastic strip to induce bleeding. In Patient 2, the plastic strip was partially withdrawn on day 3 and completely removed on day 4. By day 5, the reattached digit remained bruised and was subsequently treated by the fingertip incision bleeding method. In this group, replantations reconstructed with a vein supply showed no obvious atrophy compared with fingertips without anastomosing veins. Our experience of treating a considerable number of cases indicates that there is characteristically a lesser degree and shorter duration of obstruction of venous return following replantation in younger than in older children (Boyraz and Sayger, 2011); the rate of successful replantation of the fingertips is therefore higher in younger than in older children. Unlike adults, children have immense potential for adaptability (Frykman, 1976) and re-innervation is consequently often close to normal, especially in the younger ones (Barbary et al., 2013). Distal amputations often achieve very good results with replantation, including recovery of sensation (Kotkansalo, 2012; Ciclamini et al., 2013; Ozcanli et al., 2013; Peraut et al., 2015).
Barbary et al. (2013) showed that nerve suturing is not necessary in amputations in Zones I to III, because there is adjacent and spontaneous neurotization. Shi et al. (2010) reported excellent restoration of finger motion and appearance after an average of 26 months (range, 6 to 36 months) of follow-up, with the parents and children expressing satisfaction with the final results. When performing monofilament testing of pressure thresholds, we define 2.83, 4.31, and 3.61 as satisfactory and 4.56 and 6.65 as unsatisfactory results. In our group, the regained s2PDs ranged from 5.0 to 8.0 mm (mean, 6.4 ± 1.14 mm). In this study, differences in SW scores between fingertips with or without nerve repair were not significant, which is in accordance with Barbary et al.'s conclusions (2013). Additionally, we found that replanted digits atrophy if veins have not been anastomosed.
Sensory re-education is very important after replantation of fingers (Dellon, 1986; Piza-Katzer and Estermann, 2007; Cong et al., 2010). In the present study, although not all patients received sensory re-education and the average follow-up was 9.7 months, according to monofilament examination recovery of sensation was satisfactory in all the patients. Patients 2 and 5 achieved excellent results according to the s2PD test. The s2PD test was not performed on the other patients because they were too young.
We believe that our results would have been better if we had provided sensory re-education and prolonged our duration of follow-up. Good outcomes regarding fingertip sensation and restoration of length and cosmetic appearance have been reported by many researchers (Buntic and Brooks, 2010; Kantarci et al., 2010; Barbary et al., 2013).
In conclusion, fingertip replantation in children provides good sensory function and cosmetic outcomes and the procedure should be attempted, if technically feasible.
Acknowledgments: We would like to thank Zeng-tao Wang from Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, China, for providing anatomical details and figures of fingers.
Author contributions: ZWZ and XYZ analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding the replantation of fingertips. JHL and YJH were responsible for follow-up of patients. YJH, XJH and BH finished the operation of replantation. BH and ZTW collected the anatomical data, drew the graphs and raised the new division of surgical zone of the fingertip. ZWZ and BH edited and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the paper.
Conflicts of interest: None declared.
Research ethics: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University of (approval No. (2009)99). The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant ethical principles.
Declaration of patient consent: The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, patients or their legal guardians have given their consent for the images and other clinical information of patients to be reported in the journal. The patients or their legal guardians understand that the names and initials of patients will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.
Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.
| References|| |
Balan JR (2016) Free toe pulp flap for finger pulp and volar defect reconstruction. Indian J Plast Surg 49:178-184.
Barbary S, Dap F, Dautel G (2013) Finger replantation: surgical technique and indications. Chir Main 32:363-372.
Beris AE, Lykissas MG, Korompilias AV, Mitsionis GI, Vekris MD, Kostas-Agnantis IP (2010) Digit and hand replantation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1141-1147.
Boyraz G, Sayger TV (2011) Psychological well-being among fathers of children with and without disabilities: the role of family cohesion, adaptability, and paternal self-efficacy. American journal of men's health 5:286-296.
Brown M, Lu Y, Chung KC, Mahmoudi E (2017) Annual Hospital Volume and Success of Digital Replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:672-680.
Buntic RF, Brooks D (2010) Standardized protocol for artery-only fingertip replantation. J Hand Surg Am 35:1491-1496.
Butler DP, Murugesan L, Ruston J, Woollard AC, Jemec B (2016) The outcomes of digital tip amputation replacement as a composite graft in a paediatric population. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 41:164-170.
Chen YC, Chan FC, Hsu CC, Lin YT, Chen CT, Lin CH (2013) Fingertip replantation without venous anastomosis. Ann Plast Surg 70:284-288.
Ciclamini D, Tos P, Magistroni E, Panero B, Titolo P, Da Rold I, Battiston B (2013) Functional and subjective results of 20 thumb replantations. Injury 44:504-507.
Cigna E, Lo Torto F, Maruccia M, Ruggieri M, Zaccheddu F, Chen HC, Ribuffo D (2015) Postoperative care in finger replantation: our case-load and review of the literature. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 19:2552-2561.
Cong H, Sui H, Wang C, Wang Z, Yang Q, Wang B (2010) Ten-digit replantation with seven years follow-up: A case report. Microsurgery 30:405-409.
Dadaci M, Ince B, Altuntas Z, Bitik O, Uzun H, Bilgen F
(2015) A novel technique for distal fingertip replantation: Polypropylene suture guided interpositional vein graft. J Plast Surg Hand Surg doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2015.1041968.
Dadaci M, Ince B, Altuntas Z, Bitik O, Kamburoglu HO, Uzun H (2016) Assessment of survival rates compared according to the Tamai and Yamano classifications in fingertip replantations. Indian J Orthop 50:384-389.
De Frenne H, Dhooghe P
(1983) Experience with 46 cases of digital replantation and revascularization. Acta Chir Belg 83:284-287.
Dellon AL (1986) Sensory recovery in replanted digits and transplanted toes: a review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2:123-129.
Ding ZH, Wang ZT (2007) Atlas of Clinical Anatomy of the Hand. Ji'nan: Shandong Science and Technology Press Co. Ltd.
Efanov JI, Rizis D, Landes G, Bou-Merhi J, Harris PG, Danino MA (2016) Impact of the number of veins repaired in short-term digital replantation survival rate. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69:640-645.
Engdahl R, Morrison N
(2015) Traumatic thumb amputation: case and review. Eplasty 15:ic18.
Epameinondas K, Christos A, Petros K, Avraam D, Othon P, Vincent C (2016) Predictable Pattern Digital Artery Perforator Flap: An Alternative Concept in Digital Reconstruction. Hand (N
Fakin R, Gazzola R, Calcagni M, Giovanoli P, Giesen T (2015) Replantation by palmar arteriovenous anastomosis in complex finger amputations. Chir Main 34:240-244.
Frykman GK (1976) Peripheral nerve injuries in children. Orthop Clin North Am 7:701-716.
Glickman LT, Mackinnon SE (1990) Sensory recovery following digital replantation. Microsurgery 11:236-242.
He B, Zhu Q, Chai Y, Ding X, Tang J, Gu L, Xiang J, Yang Y, Zhu J, Liu X (2015) Safety and efficacy evaluation of a human acellular nerve graft as a digital nerve scaffold: a prospective, multicentre controlled clinical trial. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 9:286-295.
Hirase Y (1997) Salvage of fingertip amputated at nail level: new surgical principles and treatments. Ann Plast Surg 38:151-157.
Huan AS, Regmi S, Gu JX, Liu HJ, Zhang WZ (2016) Fingertip replantation (zone I) without venous anastomosis: clinical experience and outcome analysis. Springerplus 5:1835.
Idrissi ME, Elibrahimi A, Shimi M, Elmrini A (2016) Digital replantation, results and complications: study of a series of 18 cases. Pan Afr Med J 24:184.
Ishikawa K, Ogawa Y, Soeda H, Yoshida Y (1990) A new classification of the amputation level for the distal part of the finger. J Jpn Soc Reconstr Microsurg 3:54-62.
Jazayeri L, Klausner JQ, Chang J (2013) Distal digital replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1207-1217.
Jeon BJ, Yang JW, Roh SY, Ki SH, Lee DC, Kim JS (2016) Lateral nail fold incision technique for venous anastomosis in fingertip replantation. Ann Plast Surg 76:67-71.
Kantarci U, Cepel S, Buldu H (2010) Successful replantation in ten-digit amputation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44:76-78.
Kim JH, Lee YM (2015) Fingertip replantation using Y-shaped vein graft to pulp artery. Ann Plast Surg 75:424-429.
Kim JS, Yang JW, Lee DC, Ki SH, Roh SY (2013) Challenges in fingertip replantation. Semin Plast Surg 27:165-173.
Kim SW, Han HH, Jung SN (2014) Use of the mechanical leech for successful zone I replantation. ScientificWorldJournal 2014:105234.
Komatsu S, Tamai S (1968) Successful replantation of a completely cut-off thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:374-377.
Kotkansalo T (2012) Fingertip injuries. Duodecim 128:399-407.
Lima JQ, Jr., Carli AD, Nakamoto HA, Bersani G, Crepaldi BE, de Rezende MR (2015) Prognostic factors on survival rate of fingers replantation. Acta Ortop Bras 23:16-18.
Ma Z, Guo F, Qi J, Xiang W, Zhang J (2016) Effects of non-surgical factors on digital replantation survival rate: a meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 41:157-163.
Masuhara K, Tamai S, Fukunishi H, Obama K, Komatsu S (1967) Experience with reanastomosis of the amputated thumb. Seikei Geka 18:403-404.
Meek MF (2001) A randomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1087-1088.
Murphy AD, Keating CP, Penington A, McCombe D, Coombs CJ (2017) Paediatric fingertip composite grafts: Do they all go black? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:173-177.
Nazerani S, Motamedi MH, Ebadi MR, Nazerani T, Bidarmaghz B (2011) Experience with distal finger replantation: a 20-year retrospective study from a major trauma center. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 15:144-150.
Ozcanli H, Coskunfirat OK, Bektas G, Cavit A (2013) Innervated digital artery perforator flap. J Hand Surg Am 38:350-356.
Park HC, Bahar-Moni AS, Cho SH, Kim SS, Park HS, Ahn SC (2013) Classification of distal fingertip amputation based on the arterial system for replantation. J Hand Microsurg 5:4-8.
Peraut E, Mirous MP, Chammas M (2015) Secondary restoration of fingertip sensation with Littler's heterodigital neurovascular island flap after ring avulsion injury: report of two cases. Chir Main 34:49-54.
Piza-Katzer H, Estermann D (2007) Cognitive re-education and early functional mobilisation in hand therapy after bilateral hand transplantation and heterotopic hand replantation--two case reports. Acta Neurochir Suppl 100:169-171.
Regmi S, Gu JX, Zhang NC, Liu HJ (2016) A systematic review of outcomes and complications of primary fingertip reconstruction using reverse-flow homodigital island flaps. Aesthetic Plast Surg 40:277-283.
Saha SS, Pandey A, Parwal C (2015) Arterial segments as microvascular interposition grafts in venous anastomosis in digital replantations. Indian J Plast Surg 48:166-171.
Scheker LR, Becker GW (2011) Distal finger replantation. J Hand Surg Am 36:521-528.
Shi D, Qi J, Li D, Zhu L, Jin W, Cai D (2010) Fingertip replantation at or beyond the nail base in children. Microsurgery 30:380-385.
Streit L, Dvořák Z, Novák O, Stiborová S, Veselý J (2014) The use of medicinal leeches in fingertip replantation without venous anastomosis - case report of a 4-year-old patient. Acta Chir Plast 56:23-26.
Sun G, Nie K, Jin W, Wei Z, Qi J, Wang D (2015) Composite tissue flap at perforating branches of saphenous artery: a new design for repairing composite tissue defects in anterior knee. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:21448-21453.
Sunil TM (2006) A technique for postoperative cooling after composite grafting of the fingertip. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 10:118-119.
Wang ZT, Sun WH (2014) Cosmetic reconstruction of the digits in the hand by composite tissue grafting. Clin Plast Surg 41:407-427.
Wang ZT, Wang YB, Ding ZH (2014) Clinical Anatomic Atlas of Microsurgery. Ji'nan: Shandong Science and Technology Press Co. Ltd.
Weber RA, Breidenbach WC, Brown RE, Jabaley ME, Mass DP (2000) A randomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1036-1045; discussion 1046-1048.
Weinstein S (1993) Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test. J Hand Ther 6:11-22; discussion 50.
Wen G, Xu J, Chai YM (2017) Fingertip replantation with palmar venous anastomoses in children. Ann Plast Surg 78:692-696.
Yabe T, Muraoka M, Motomura H, Ozawa T (2001) Fingertip replantation using a single volar arteriovenous anastomosis and drainage with a transverse tip incision. J Hand Surg Am 26:1120-1124.
Yamano Y (1985) Replantation of the amputated distal part of the fingers. J Hand Surg Am 10:211-218.
Yu H, Wei L, Liang B, Hou S, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Nonsurgical factors of digital replantation and survival rate: A metaanalysis. Indian J Orthop 49:265-271.
Zhu JK (2008) Microsurgery. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House Co. Ltd.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Improved Abdominal Hypodermal Pocket for Salvage of the Amputated Fingertip (Tamai Zone I)
| ||Yiming Lu,Bin Wang,Hongjun Liu,Naichen Zhang,Jiaxiang Gu |
| ||Indian Journal of Surgery. 2021; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Comparative assessment of fingertip replantation in paediatric and adult patients within a single institution
| ||Fethiye Damla Menkü Özdemir,Hakan Uzun,Erdi Özdemir,Ali Emre Aksu |
| ||Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2021; 46(8): 877 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Pediatric Digit Replantation Following Traumatic Amputation: Nationwide Analysis of Patient Selection, Outcomes, and Cost
| ||Neill Y. Li,Justin E. Kleiner,Andrew P. Harris,Avi D. Goodman,Julia A. Katarincic |
| ||HAND. 2021; 16(5): 612 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Non-microsurgical Composite Grafting for Acute Management of Fingertip Amputation
| ||Kate Elzinga,Kevin C. Chung |
| ||Hand Clinics. 2021; 37(1): 43 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Replantation of Cryopreserved Fingers
| ||Zengtao Wang,Lei Zhu,Wei Kou,Wenhai Sun,Bo He,Chunxia Wang,Yun Shen,Yang Wang,Zhaowei Zhu,You Liang |
| ||Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019; 144(3): 679 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Pediatric Replantation and Revascularization
| ||Amir H. Taghinia |
| ||Hand Clinics. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|