|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 573-585
Extracellular matrix and biomimetic engineering microenvironment for neuronal differentiation
, Sabrina Mattiassi1
, Eyleen L Goh2
, Evelyn K.F. Yim PhD 1
1 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
2 Neuroscience Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
|Date of Submission||24-Apr-2019|
|Date of Decision||06-May-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||14-Jun-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||18-Oct-2019|
Evelyn K.F. Yim
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario
Source of Support: The work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery (NSERC 2016040;
to DJ, SM and EKFY) and University of Waterloo start up fund (to DJ, SM and EKFY) for their generous funding. In addition, NSERC Undergraduate
Student Research Awards (USRA; to SM and EKFY) and Collaborative Research and Training Experience (CREATE, 401207296; to
SM and EKFY) for their generous partial funding, Conflict of Interest: None
Extracellular matrix (ECM) influences cell differentiation through its structural and biochemical properties. In nervous system, neuronal behavior is influenced by these ECMs structures which are present in a meshwork, fibrous, or tubular forms encompassing specific molecular compositions. In addition to contact guidance, ECM composition and structures also exert its effect on neuronal differentiation. This short report reviewed the native ECM structure and composition in central nervous system and peripheral nervous system, and their impact on neural regeneration and neuronal differentiation. Using topographies, stem cells have been differentiated to neurons. Further, focussing on engineered biomimicking topographies, we highlighted the role of anisotropic topographies in stem cell differentiation to neurons and its recent temporal application for efficient neuronal differentiation.
Keywords: biomimetic platforms; biophysical cues; contact guidance; extracellular matrix; neuronal development; neural regeneration; neural stem cell niche; neuronal differentiation; neuronal maturation; stem cell; topography
|How to cite this article:|
Jain D, Mattiassi S, Goh EL, Yim EK. Extracellular matrix and biomimetic engineering microenvironment for neuronal differentiation. Neural Regen Res 2020;15:573-85
|How to cite this URL:|
Jain D, Mattiassi S, Goh EL, Yim EK. Extracellular matrix and biomimetic engineering microenvironment for neuronal differentiation. Neural Regen Res [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 4];15:573-85. Available from: http://www.nrronline.org/text.asp?2020/15/4/573/266907
Deepak Jain, Sabrina Mattiassi. These two authors contributed equally to the article.
| Introduction|| |
Nervous system extracellular matrix (ECM) plays a major role in neural development and regeneration processes such as neocortex folding, stem cell niche maintenance, peripheral nerve regeneration, neural cell migration, axonal growth, and many more (Moore et al., 2002; Colognato et al., 2005; Gonzalez-Perez et al., 2013; Gattazzo et al., 2014; Herrera-Perez et al., 2015; Long et al., 2018). ECM mediates these processes via cell-ECM interactions which provides the cells with a wealth of signals such as growth factors, bioactive molecules, and biophysical cues in a spatiotemporal manner (Mecham, 2001; Yue, 2014). The physical properties of ECM that are of prime importance for its function include elasticity, matrix pore size, and the ECM structure or topography. Biophysical cues play a major role in neural development and regeneration processes such as neurogenesis, nerve repair, neuronal cell migration, and axonal growth (Moore and Sheetz, 2011; Franze, 2013; Franze et al., 2013; Wieringa et al., 2018). Of these different biophysical properties, matrix elasticity and topographies are well studied and have been shown to drastically affect neural cell behavior. ECM structure and topography influences many different neural cell processes including neuron migration, neuronal stem cell fate regulation, and nerve regeneration (Hoffman-Kim et al., 2010; Ankam et al., 2013b; Marcus et al., 2017; Simitzi et al., 2017).
Neural differentiation processes have wide clinical and industrial applications. Stem cell-derived neurons have been widely used for the development of cell-based therapies for the treatment of neurological diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease and multiple sclerosis, and neurological damage such as spinal cord injury or stroke (Lindvall et al., 2004; Martino and Pluchino, 2006; Tomita et al., 2013; Trounson and McDonald, 2015; Shi et al., 2016). In addition, these cells have also been used for fundamental neurological studies, drug-screening platforms, neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disease modelling (Avior et al., 2016; Shi et al., 2016; Dutta et al., 2017). Conventional methods of neural differentiation rely primarily on the use of biochemical factors to regulate the differentiation process. However, the use of biochemical factors alone has proven to result in long differentiation periods and provide minimal control over lineage-commitment (Schuldiner et al., 2001; Chambers et al., 2009; Hu and Zhang, 2009). Hence, appropriate integration of ECM biophysical cues in stem cell related regenerative therapies is much desired. In this review, we focused on understanding the composition of native ECM in central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) and the resulting native ECM architecture and topography. We briefly discuss the role of native ECM composition and topographical cues in neural regeneration and neuronal progenitor differentiation. In addition, we also provide an overview of the parameters that affect the topography efficiency in synthetic platforms used to enhance neuronal differentiation of stem cells, including pattern isotropy, feature dimensions, and temporal and spatial applications. Lastly, we concluded by emphasising the need for further understanding of the native structures and topography dynamics for better development of biomimetic platforms to optimize functional neuronal differentiation. For the present review, we searched the literature using keywords such as “Surface topography”, “Neuronal differentiation and surface topography”, “Nervous system extracellular matrix”, “Central nervous system”, “Peripheral nervous system”, “Stem cells and surface topography”, “Embryonic stem cells and neuronal differentiation”, “Neural stem cells”, “Induced pluripotent stem cells and neuronal differentiation”, “Nervous system stem cell niche”, “Mechanotransduction”, and “Topography dynamics” on PubMed and Google scholar. In addition, we also used modifications of the above main keywords to thoroughly search the literature. The major inclusion criteria preferred the literature comprising native ECM or surface topography.
| Composition and Topographies of the Nervous System Extracellular Matrix|| |
Cells secrete and deposit distinct molecules in their parenchyma resulting in the formation of native ECM structures (Frantz et al., 2010; Lau et al., 2013). Throughout human body, the ECM in different tissues are present in various structural and molecular compositions (Frantz et al., 2010). The nervous system ECM has specialized structures encompassing molecular compositions secreted or deposited by surrounding neural cells in a spatiotemporal manner (Barros et al., 2011; Lau et al., 2013). The deposited ECM proteins form functional 3-dimension (3D) architectures to support cellular functions. In addition to cell membrane surface structures (Blumenthal et al., 2014), ECM architectures and topographies also have the potential to affect neural cell processes such as cell migration, differentiation, cellular function, and morphology (Yim et al., 2007; Hoffman-Kim et al., 2010; Barros et al., 2011; Ankam et al., 2013b; Marcus et al., 2017; Sathe et al., 2017; Tan et al., 2018). Mutations of ECM molecules in nervous system have provided hints towards the role of molecular composition in forming native ECM surface topographies. For example, mutations in laminin γ1 causes the surface fragmentation of the embryonic plial basement membrane directly affecting radial glia cell attachment and dysplasia of cortical plate neurons (Halfter et al., 2002). Similarly, in perlecan mutants (one of the members of heparan sulphate proteoglycans), basement membrane shows partial disruption leading to inadequate neuronal composition of the cerebral cortex (Haubst et al., 2006). CNS and PNS cells exhibit different functional characteristics. ECM topography and molecular composition also differs in CNS and PNS which might influence these cell characteristics. Hence, in this section, we discuss the various molecular composition of CNS and PNS ECM, and the resulting ECM architectures and topographies present in these systems.
| Native neural ECM structure and composition|| |
During late embryonic and early post-natal stages, brain ECM is present in a “juvenile” state providing appropriate cues for blood-brain barrier development, neural stem cell (NSC) differentiation, proliferation, and migration (Zimmermann and Dours-Zimmermann, 2008; Barros et al., 2011; Lau et al., 2013; Barnes et al., 2017). It is mainly composed of versicans, neurocan, laminins, tenascin-C, hyaluronan, and cartilage link proteins (HAPLN1), which are deposited by NSCs, glia cells, and neurons in their microenvironment in a spatiotemporal manner (Colognato and Yurchenco, 2000; Rauch, 2004; Zimmermann and Dours-Zimmermann, 2008; Barros et al., 2011; Lau et al., 2013; Mouw et al., 2014; Barnes et al., 2017). In this state of ECM, hyaluronan acts as a backbone around which versicans, neurocan, laminins, tenascin-C, and HAPLN1 aggregate and interact with each other (Colognato and Yurchenco, 2000; Mouw et al., 2014).
After 2–3 weeks of post-natal stage in mouse embryonic CNS, juvenile ECM remodels into a more mature form through changes in gene expression patterns as well as proteolysis by matrix metalloproteinases (matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9) and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS) enzymes (ADAMTS1 and ADAMTS4). Subsequently, the juvenile ECM will be replaced by other variant ECM molecules of the same family (Bandtlow and Zimmermann, 2000; Rauch, 2004; Zimmermann and Dours-Zimmermann, 2008). For example, versican V1 is replaced by another splice variant versican V2; tenascin-C is replaced by tenascin-R and tenascin-N; and HAPLN1 is replaced by brain link proteins (Rauch, 2004; Zimmermann and Dours-Zimmermann, 2008). This remodelling process is termed as the maturation process, where neural migration is restricted and stable neuronal connections are formed, leading to improvement in neural cell conductance and neuroprotective functions (Zimmermann and Dours-Zimmermann, 2008). Scanning electron microscopy images of decellularized adult rat brain shows microlobular structure arranged in a non-specific orientation (Baiguera et al., 2014). Similar to rat brain, native porcine brain also has similar micro-architecture (DeQuach et al., 2011). However, dimensions and spacings between these structures are not well elucidated. This matured ECM can be majorly categorized into three different types of structure, namely basement membrane, perineuronal nets, and neural interstitial matrix [Figure 1]A. Basement membrane plays a major role in formation and maintenance of blood-brain barrier; acting as a boundary between endothelial cells and CNS parenchymal tissue. It is composed of various ECM proteins such as collagen IV, laminin-nidogen complexes (Laminin 111, Laminin 211, Laminin 411, Laminin 511, Nidogen-1, and Nidogen-2), fibronectin, dystroglycan, agrin, and perlecan (Lau et al., 2013; Thomsen et al., 2017). Using transmission electron microscopy, basement membrane in mice cerebral cortex is measured to be 40–60 μm in thickness and present as a continuous layer. In addition, high resolution transmission electron microscopy cross-sectional images of this basement membrane show convex-shape nanostructures (Dong et al., 2002). However, these convex shapes are yet to be revealed if they are present as individual domes, or if the convex shapes are the cross-sectional view of continuous structures such as folds, ridges or fibers. Fractone is also another type of basement membrane possessing similar composition as vascular basement membrane. However, the location and structure of this matrix form is different from vascular basement membrane. Fractones are primarly located in ventricles and spinal canal, and present as an isolated branch shape structure ranging between 1–6 µm in size (Mercier et al., 2003; Kerever et al., 2007; Mercier, 2016).
|Figure 1: Nervous system components architecture.|
(A) Schematic diagram of brain extracellular matrix (ECM) components and their architecture. (B) Schematic diagram of peripheral nerve cross-section and the collagen fibers.
Click here to view
In contrast to basement membrane, perineuronal nets are predominantly composed of proteoglycans, tenascin-R, hyaluronan, and link proteins in the brain parenchyma (Barros et al., 2011; Lau et al., 2013). The extracellular proteoglycans interacts with the linear hyaluronic acid molecules deposited on the plasma membrane that is further stabilized by tenascin R and link proteins, forming a dense 3D meshwork surrounding neurons (Kwok et al., 2011; Arranz et al., 2014). Perineuronal net appear to be in micro-fibrous form and the fibrous structure does not have a particular orientation (Giamanco et al., 2010; Kwok et al., 2011; Arranz et al., 2014; de Winter et al., 2016). In contrast to perineuronal net meshwork structure, neural interstitial matrix is dispersed in the parenchyma, majorly comprising a dense networks of proteoglycans, hyaluronan, tenascins, and link proteins, as well as relatively small amounts of collagen XV, elastin, laminin 511, and fibronectin forming fibrous structures (Seppänen et al., 2007; Barros et al., 2011; Lau et al., 2013; Happel and Frischknecht, 2016; Omar et al., 2017). Even though this matrix is present in the brain in a ubiquitous manner and it may impart essential 3D biochemical and biophysical cues. In comparison to other forms, this matrix type is relatively less studied in terms of both structural and functional properties (Lau et al., 2013).
Similar to CNS, PNS also consists of basement membrane composed of collagens (Collagen types I, III, IV, and XV), laminins (Laminin 211, Laminin 411, and Laminin 511), nidogen-1, heparin sulfate proteoglycans, and fibronectin in a tubular form, which surrounds Schwann cells along the axon in a continuous manner (Chernousov and Carey, 2000; Barros et al., 2011; Catala and Kubis, 2013; Gonzalez-Perez et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2015). Outside of these individual units, fascicle interior between axon-Schwann cells units is majorly composed of collagen type I and III fibrils oriented in a longitudinal direction (Shellswell et al., 1979; Montes et al., 1984). This interior layer of the nerve is known as endoneurium [Figure 1]B. In rat sciatic nerves, the individual endoneurium collagen fibrils have an average diameter of 41.31 ± 4.2 nm forming collagen bundles of 1–3 µm thickness (Junqueira et al., 1979; Ushiki and Ide, 1990). This layer is further protected by another layer composed of perineurial cells, basement membrane, and collagen type I and III fibrils (average 30–60 nm collagen fibril diameter, about 0.5–3 µm thick collagen bundles in rat sciatic nerve), forming a perineurium layer in a tubular shape structures with collagen meshwork (Junqueira et al., 1979; Ushiki and Ide, 1990). In humans, the basement membrane of sural nerve perineurium has been shown to be 405.86 ± 4.2 nm thick (Johnson et al., 1981; Hill and Williams, 2004). In addition, multiple bundles of perineurium layers are surrounded by epineurium consisting longitudinally oriented collagen type I fibrils. These epineurium collagen fibrils have an average 77.33 ± 11 nm diameter in rat sciatic nerve and collectively, these epineurium collagen bundles are 10–20 µm thick (Junqueira et al., 1979; Ushiki and Ide, 1990; Catala and Kubis, 2013; Gonzalez-Perez et al., 2013; Sridharan et al., 2015). Junqueira et al. (1979) also observed that the collagen fibril diameter in human femoral nerve shared similar dimensions of endoneurium and epineurium in rat sciatic nerve. However, the collagen bundle thickness in human peripheral nerves is yet to be determined. Molecular composition, structure, dimensions, and orientation of PNS ECM in different layers are very well studied; however, the effect of fiber dimensionality of the basement membrane on the directly contacting neurites and Schwann cells is not well known. Taken together, there are many important questions still need to be addressed regarding the structure and dimensions of the topographies in both CNS and PNS ECM at different ECM development or remodelling stages. Indeed, the functions of these ECM topographies in the in vivo system remains an important question to explore such as their role in radial glia cell attachment, neuron orientation, neuron migration, and neuronal differentiation. Before discussing the potential of topographies for neural regeneration, we will briefly discuss the role of native ECM structures and composition in PNS regeneration and CNS neuronal differentiation, respectively.
| Native ECM impact on neural regeneration and neuronal stem cell differentiation|| |
Weiss coined the term “selective contact guidance” by postulating a relationship between surface structures and directed movement of cell through cell attachment (Weiss, 1947). Peripheral nerve regeneration provides an ideal platform to understand the relationship between surface structure and contact guidance. During PNS regeneration, PNS basement membrane provides the structural support to the surrounding cells. Schwann cells attach to the longitudinally aligned basement membrane structures that guide the neurites from proximal to distal stump, resulting in reattachment of proximal neurons to their appropriate distal targets (Cattin and Lloyd, 2016). Using repetitive freeze-thaw cycles (Ide et al., 1983), the decellularized nerve segments enabled regenerating neurites attached and migrated along the fiber orientation, when these decellularized nerve segments were grafted to sciatic nerve. With the advent of optimized decellularization processes, various studies also observed similar regeneration efficacy when the decellularized ECM grafts were implanted at injured peripheral nerves (Adarsh, 1988; Sondell et al., 1998; Hudson et al., 2004). However, the regenerative capability in peripheral nerve is drastically affected by the injury gap length, which is the distance between proximal and distal stump, and the regeneration rate. If the gap length is increased beyond a critical gap length (~15 mm in rat, ~40 mm in human (Kaplan et al., 2015)), then this can lead to “chronically denervated” conditions where Schwann cells and basal lamina in distal stump deteriorate due to the long-term absence of proximal neurite contact (Höke, 2006).
In comparison to peripheral nerves, CNS shows different responses upon injuries and damages. For example, in spinal cord injury, adult spinal cord tissues do not possess similar regenerative ability due to formation of lesion and glial scar boundary. This lesion mostly consists of pericytes, perivascular-derived fibroblasts, macrophages, and ependymal cells along with inhibitory ECM molecules which restricts the neuronal regeneration (Busch and Silver, 2007; Adams and Gallo, 2018). While the surrounding glial boundary broadly comprised of reactive astrocytes, NG2 glia and microglia also participate in isolating the lesioned environment from their surroundings to prevent secondary injury, and they also secrete inhibitory ECM molecules (Busch and Silver, 2007; Adams and Gallo, 2018).
Even though CNS does not show similar regenerative capacity as PNS, two major NSCs populations have been identified in the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricles and subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus in the hippocampus, and they are playing major roles in tissue homeostasis. The subventricular zone stem cells differentiate into neuroblasts that migrate to the olfactory bulb forming olfactory bulb interneurons and corpus callosum oligodendrocytes. Meanwhile, the NSCs in subgranular zone region differentiate into immature neurons before differentiating into dentate granule neurons in granule cell layer (Kazanis and ffrench-Constant, 2011; Gattazzo et al., 2014; Bond et al., 2015; Faissner and Reinhard, 2015; Gonçalves et al., 2016; de Miranda et al., 2017; Tian et al., 2018). These NSCs are closely associated with fractone and vascular basement membrane structures in subventricular zone or subgranular zone, to maintain their stemness through interacting with their surrounding microenvironment (Kazanis and ffrench-Constant, 2011; Gattazzo et al., 2014; Bond et al., 2015).
ECM composition also plays a critical role in mediating the differentiation of neuronal progenitor cells. During early developmental stages, mutations of basement membrane components laminin β2 and γ3 affect radial glial attachment and alignment disrupting asymmetric division of these progenitors (Radner et al., 2012). Similarly, prelecan knockout mice also exhibit the defects in neurogenesis process of neural progenitor populations (Girós et al., 2007; Barros et al., 2011). In addition, the degradation of ECM component chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, which are enriched in NSC growth environment during development and in adult NSC niche, results in reduced radial glia proliferation and reduction in neurogenesis (Sirko et al., 2007). Although ECM composition has been well-known to be one of the important microenvironmental signal for efficient neuronal differentiation, how ECM structures affect neuronal differentiation still remains unclear. Currently, it is technically challenging to understand the role of these structures in the in vivo system. Hence, in vitro studies provide clues to delineate the role of these topographies in neuronal differentiation.
| The Use of Nanotopographies to Enhance Neural Tissue Engineering Platforms|| |
Since contact guidance plays a major role in many neural processes, there is interest in developing technologies that mimic the biophysical cues of the native neural ECM to help enhance neuronal processes on synthetic platforms. Of particular interest is neuronal differentiation, which has many important applications including the development of cell-based therapies for the treatment of neurological diseases, neuronal regeneration, and in vitro platforms for fundamental neurological studies, drug-screen platforms, disease modelling and precision medicine platforms (Avior et al., 2016; Shi et al., 2016; Dutta et al., 2017). Conventional methods of neural differentiation rely primarily on the use of biochemical factors as a means of process regulation, however this method alone has proven to be expensive, result in long differentiation periods, and provide minimal control over lineage-commitment (Schuldiner et al., 2001; Chambers et al., 2009; Hu and Zhang, 2009). Incorporation of biophysical cues, such as topography, in synthetic substrates has been shown to significantly enhance neuronal differentiation. These platforms increase differentiation rate, reduce cost, and promote lineage specific differentiation improving neuronal yield (Schuldiner et al., 2001; Chambers et al., 2009; Hu and Zhang, 2009; Ankam et al., 2013a, 2015; Anh Tuan et al., 2016; Nguyen et al., 2018; Tan et al., 2018). There are many factors that affect the efficiency of topography. Parameters such as pattern isotropy, feature dimensions, temporal application, and sequential application should all be considered. Furthermore, these parameters should also be considered with respect to the cell type and the stage of differentiation they are undergoing, as this will affect which topographies are optimal. Commonly used stem cell types include: embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), NSCs, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). This section will focus on the key parameters that need to be considered when designing a topographically enhanced system, provide a brief overview of the efforts to optimize these parameters, and identify parameters that still need further study and optimization.
| Optimization of pattern alignment and dimensions|| |
Inspired by contact guidance phenomenon and fiber structures in the native ECM, topographical studies majorly focussed on the anisotropic topographies. Indeed, these patterns have been shown to enhance neuronal differentiation induction, reducing differentiation times, and decreasing the dependence on soluble biochemical cues required to induce differentiation. Enhancements such as upregulation of neuronal markers such as class III β-tubulin (TuJ1) or microtubule associated protein 2, earlier expression of neuronal markers, increased percentage of cell population expression neuronal markers (neuronal yield), neurite outgrowth, elongation and branching, and earlier electrophysiological activity have all been observed. Further, this enhancement by anisotropic patterns is not only limited to a certain cell type or differentiation pathway, but also in both pluripotent and multipotent cells undergoing either direct differentiation or trans-differentiation. The effects of anisotropic patterns stem largely from their ability to provide contact guidance, which can influence cell morphology and gene expression. The anisotropic patterns cause cells to elongate, altering focal adhesions and promoting cytoskeletal reorganization (Teo et al., 2010; Ankam et al., 2013b, 2015; Teo et al., 2013; Wong et al., 2014; Nguyen et al., 2016; Marcus et al., 2017; Yip et al., 2018). Isotropic patterns have been shown to promote the induction of glial differentiation (Moe et al., 2012; Ankam et al., 2013b; Qi et al., 2013). The reason this occurs is not well understood, but it is suggested that it may be due to isotropic patterns’ inability to induce cell morphologies that encourage focal adhesion formation and cytoskeletal changes required for inducing neuronal lineage (Ankam et al., 2013b, 2015). The mechanosensing of the extracellular topography involves a complex interplay between distinct mechanoreceptors, cell structure, and intracellular pathways. A variety of mechanotransduction pathways have been implicated in topography-induced improvements in neuronal differentiation. Examples include, focal adhesion kinase and focal adhesion signaling pathway, cytoskeletal contractility (Yim et al., 2010; Teo et al., 2013; Ankam et al., 2015), the Rho family GTPase (Keung et al., 2011) pathway, Hippo/yes-associated protein (Sun et al., 2014) pathway, Src and PI3K (Sawada et al., 2006) pathways, mitogen-activated protein kinase and the extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (Chen et al., 2013) pathways. In addition, other factors such as nuclei shape or nuclei mechanical properties and epigenetic modifications have also been shown to correlate with differentiation (Huang et al., 2015; Ankam et al., 2018). For an in-depth review of these mechanisms, it is recommended that readers reference Stukel and Willits (2015), and Yim and Sheetz (2012). In this review, anisotropic patterns used to enhance neuronal differentiation, with the most commonly studied gratings and fibers, will be discussed. A summary can be found in [Table 1].
|Table 1: Summary of anisotropic topographies influence on neuronal differentiation|
Click here to view
Gratings, also commonly referred to as ridges or grooves, are patterns of parallel line channels that can be rectangular, rounded or v-shaped. Methods commonly used for fabrication of micro- and nanoscale grating topographies include, soft lithography, photolithography, thermal lithography, plasma lithography, electron beam lithography, nano-imprinting, and electric field-aided casting (Teo et al., 2010; Jeon et al., 2014; Marcus et al., 2017). It is recommended that the reader reference Teo et al., Jeon et al. and, Norman and Desai for reviews of topography fabrication techniques (Norman and Desai, 2006; Teo et al., 2010; Jeon et al., 2014). Key parameters that can determine how gratings will affect cell behaviors include the width, depth, and the aspect ratio of the depth to width. In general, features wider than soma diameter (12 ± 3 μm) or the average filopodia extension length do not encourage efficient interaction with cells resulting in differentiation efficiency that is comparable to that of un-patterned substrates (Recknor et al., 2006; Béduer et al., 2012; Chan et al., 2013). In addition, known native ECM topographies are also primarily less than 10 μm in diameter. Therefore, grating widths in the range of 250 nm–10 μm that have been shown to enhance neuronal differentiation of a variety of cell types are normally considered (Yim et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2010; Béduer et al., 2012; Moe et al., 2012; Ankam et al., 2013b; Chan et al., 2013; Qi et al., 2013; Teo et al., 2014; Tan et al., 2015). Using 250 nm, 350 nm, and 2 µm wide gratings, direct neuronal differentiation was induced in ESCs and iPSCs without or with minimal use of biochemical factors. In these systems, earlier upregulation of neuronal lineage markers, and increased preference for the neuronal lineage were observed [Figure 2] (Lee et al., 2010; Ankam et al., 2013b; Chan et al., 2013; Pan et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2015). Furthermore, it was also found that alignment, extension, and neurite outgrowth of individual cells and colonies decreased with grating width (Chan et al., 2013; Song et al., 2016). For NSCs or NPCs, grating widths in the range of 250 nm–10 µm have been shown to increase early upregulation of neuronal markers such as TUJ1 and increase preference for the neuronal lineage compared to planar substrates (Moe et al., 2012). In this range, an inverse relationship between grating width and neuronal marker upregulation has been observed; however, no similar relationships could be drawn between the preference for neuronal lineage commitment (Qi et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2013). For MSCs only nano-widths (250 nm and 350 nm) were shown to have a significant impact on the directed neuronal differentiation. Interestingly, the effect was even stronger than that of retinoic acid alone on an un-patterned surface (Yim et al., 2007, 2010; Teo et al., 2013; Ankam et al., 2018). It has also been proposed that an upper limit on grating width of 1.9 µm may also exist for MSC. In a combination of transmission electron microscopy observation and computational modeling, Zeng et al. (2018) proposes a model showing that for grating widths above 1.9 µm, the basal cell membrane tend to bend into the grooves, which correlates with reducing elongation and alignment of MSC on grating surfaces.
|Figure 2: Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) colonies and hPSC elongate along the grating axis of 2 μm gratings.|
(A) 2 μm gratings are reproduced with high fidelity, as demonstrated by scanning electron microscope. PSC cultured on the unpatterned control. (B) hPSC cultured on the unpatterned control exhibited a spread morphology in contrast to the elongated morphology observed on 2 μm gratings. Cells were stained for phalloidin (green) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (blue). Scale bars: 5 μm (left) and 200 μm (right). (C) The filopodia of hPSC on 2 μm gratings extend along, across and between gratings (white arrows). Adapted from Chan et al. (2013).
Click here to view
In general, grating depths in the range of 250 nm–4 µm are most commonly studied (Yim et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2010; Béduer et al., 2012; Moe et al., 2012; Ankam et al., 2013b; Chan et al., 2013; Qi et al., 2013). Not many studies have investigated the effect of grating depth on neuronal differentiation. However, a correlation between grating depth and preferential neuronal differentiation of NPCs has been observed. Using NPC on 2 μm wide gratings and media favouring astrocyte differentiation, Chua et al. (2014) showed that if the 2 μm wide gratings were fabricated with depths of 2–4 µm, a higher percentage of cells expressed neuronal markers with a lower percentage of cells expressed astrocyte markers. This trend of increased neuron differentiation with increased depth, was maintained up until a saturation point of 2–4 μm in depth. Beyond this point, perpendicular neurite growth was hindered due to the high energy costs of neurites bending in deep grooves. A similar trend was shown using iPSCs, wherein increasing grating depth from 150 nm to 560 nm (using grating widths of 500 nm and 1 µm), significantly increased the fraction of cells committed to the neuronal lineage (Song et al., 2016). It was also shown, that grating depth relative to width, also referred to as aspect ratio, can also impact cell behavior. Chan et al. (2013) found that ESC on micro gratings with 1:1 aspect ratios has the greatest elongation and alignment. A similar result using MSC was observed by Wong et al. (2014), wherein aspect ratio was shown to be better at predicting cell elongation and alignment than either depth or width alone. Thus, depth, width, and aspect ratio play a significant role in the topographical modification of cell behavior.
Fibrous scaffolds closely resemble the native nervous system ECM fibrils, as they are made of mesh of micro- and/or nanoscale fibers. In these meshes, fibers can either be aligned in parallel or randomly oriented as present in native CNS and PNS ECM structures. There are many methods of fibrous scaffold fabrication, however, the most commonly used for tissue engineering purposes are electrospinning, phase separation and self-assembly (Jhala and Vasita, 2015; Marcus et al., 2017). It is recommended that the reader reference Sultana (2015) for a review on fibrous scaffold fabrication and materials for tissue engineering purposes. Diameter and orientation of fibers are key dimensions that can determine how they will affect cell behavior. Almost all published studies use fibers with diameters in the range of 200 nm–2 μm similar to collagen fiber bundle thickness observed in PNS endoneurium and perineurium structures (Christopherson et al., 2009; Xie et al., 2009; Lim et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2012). Similar to gratings, there is no consensus on the optimal fiber diameter. However, there seems to be a consensus on the optimal orientation. Early reports indicated that fiber orientation did not impact neuronal differentiation efficiency (Yang et al., 2005), but subsequent studies overwhelmingly showed the opposite. Fiber alignment was shown to significantly improved neuronal differentiation in a variety of cell types including ESCs, iPSCs (Xie et al., 2009; Mohtaram et al., 2015; Abbasi et al., 2016), NSCs (Christopherson et al., 2009; Lim et al., 2010; Bakhru et al., 2011; Lins et al., 2017), and MSCs (Cho et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2012). Embryoid bodies on aligned fibers extended along the fiber axis and had more extensive neurite outgrowth compared to random and planar substrates. On randomly oriented fibers, both ESCs and NSCs tended to extend in multiple directions and became glial-like in morphology. For neuronal differentiation of ESCs, biochemical factors were still required. However, when used in combination with aligned fibers, embryoid bodies showed higher upregulation of neuronal markers, and the neuronal lineage was promoted over the glial (astrocyte) lineage, which was suppressed (Xie et al., 2009; Abbasi et al., 2016). Similar results were observed when using NSCs, wherein on aligned fibers, cells had a more elongated morphology compared to random or planar substrates (Yang et al., 2005; Christopherson et al., 2009; Lim et al., 2010; Mahairaki et al., 2010; Bakhru et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012). Upregulation of neuronal markers and increased neuronal yield were observed in NSCs grown on fibers (Christopherson et al., 2009; Lim et al., 2010; Mahairaki et al., 2010; Bakhru et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012; Lins et al., 2017). Similar to what was observed with ESCs, in addition to a bias in neuronal lineage commitment, a negative selection against the glial lineage (oligodendrocytes) was also observed in NSCs (Lim et al., 2010). The effect of alignment was even more significant for MSCs. Only MSCs grown on aligned substrates showed improvement in neuronal differentiation, specifically neuronal marker upregulation and a preference to the neuronal lineage over the glial lineage. MSCs grown on random fibers performed equally as well as planar substrates (Cho et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2012).
The effect of fiber diameter is less clear and optimal fiber diameters widely vary depending on the study design. Early studies using NSCs reported that nanoscale fibers were much more effective that microfibers (300 nm vs. 1 µm) for increasing the rate at which cells took on the elongated neuronal morphology, in other words, the rate of differentiation (Yang et al., 2005). Two later studies have shown that while nanofibers outperform microfibers, larger nanofibers are more effective than smaller nanofibers (749 nm vs. 283 nm and 480 nm vs. 260 nm) at increasing the rate at which cells began expressing neuronal markers and overall neuronal yield when using NSC (Christopherson et al., 2009; Lim et al., 2010). However, using ESC derived neural progenitors, it was reported that 400 nm fibers performed better than 800 nm fibers, so the optimal fiber diameter may be in the mid-range of the nanoscale (Wang et al., 2012). Thus, fiber diameter plays a significant role in the topographical modification of cell behavior. It is of interest for future studies using different cell types than those mentioned here, such as iPSCs or MSCs, to incorporate this parameter into their analysis.
Optimization of topography application sequence and combination
Previous studies, like those outlined above, tended to focus on early induction and lineage commitment. However, to develop optimal systems resulting in fully functional neurons, enhancement of all differentiation phases is likely required. Interestingly, it has been shown that sequentially applied topographies can further improve neuronal differentiation as cells can “remember” past topographies (Chan et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2014b). Additionally, topographies that were once thought to be of no value to neuronal differentiation, such as isotropic patterns, have recently been shown to improve differentiation, when applied during later phases, such as maturation. Thus, there is potential to create systems where the benefits of certain topographies applied at different stages can be “added” together to improve the overall differentiation process.
It has previously been shown that cells store information from past environments and that this information can continue to influence cell fate in the future (Chan et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2014a; Muhammad et al., 2015). Using ESC and iPSC, Chan et al. (2013) demonstrated this memory effect for pluripotent cells undergoing neuronal differentiation. They showed that ESC and iPSC have a mechanical memory of their past environments and the topographical signals that they were exposed to during different stages of the maintenance and neuronal differentiation. PSCs were exposed to topography during maintenance, and/or during neuronal differentiation. Remarkably, when PSCs were exposed to grating pattern in the maintenance phase, and then PSCs were moved to planar substrate, enhanced neuronal differentiation was observed. Furthermore, they showed that the effect of topography can indeed be additive. By incorporating a topographical priming step, they were able to decrease the differentiation period and reduce the amount of biochemical cues required (Chan et al., 2013). Similarly, Yang et al. (2014b) demonstrated hierarchical pattern-induced cells continued to exhibit enhanced neuronal differentiation even after the topography was removed. In addition, in vivo regional priming of primary NPC was also shown to play a major role in cell response to in vitro application of topography (Sathe et al., 2017). Notably, differentiation efficiency and morphological changes depended more on the cell source than on the topography being used. For example, although hippocampal cells were slightly more elongated than cortical cells aligned along the gratings, only hippocampal neurons showed significant elongation on pillars (Sathe et al., 2017).
Interestingly, optimal topography was found to differ in different phases of differentiation. While gratings enhance the initial stages of neuronal differentiation of iPSCs into dopaminergic neurons, pillars were better at enhancing maturation. Maturation of cells on pillars resulted in increased neurite branching, and enhanced maturation with more cells being capable of repetitive firing, as compared to cells that matured on gratings or planar substrates [Figure 3] (Tan et al., 2018). This is rather surprising as pillars were previously thought to enhance glial morphologies and have no effects on neuronal differentiation (Moe et al., 2012; Ankam et al., 2013b; Qi et al., 2013). Using a combination of gratings for the early stages of differentiation and pillars for maturation, it is possible to increase both the yield of mature dopaminergic neurons and differentiation rate (repetitive firing at 4 weeks compared to 55–70 days) (Tan et al., 2018). Thus, there is great potential to increase control and enhancement of differentiation into functional neurons by optimizing the temporal and sequential parameters of topography.
|Figure 3: Morphology of tyrosine hydroxylase-positive (TH) neurons on patterned and unpatterned substrates after 21 days of differentiation.|
(A) Representative images of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived TH neurons on unpatterned, gratings and pillared PDMS substrates. Images were digitally stitched from overlapping fields of view to capture the entire length of neurites. Cells on gratings were aligned on the gratings axis (arrows). Scale bars: 100 μm. (B) Average neurite length per neuron. TH neurons were more elongated when differentiated on gratings than pillars and unpatterned control. (C) Number of terminals per neuron. (D) Number of branch points per neuron. (E) Sholl analysis. TH neurons have significantly more branching and increased neuronal complexity when differentiated on pillars than gratings and unpatterned control. All data are represented as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments with over 30 TH-positive neurons analyzed on each pattern. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Adapted from Tan et al. (2018).
Click here to view
| Conclusions and Future Perspectives|| |
In conclusion, studies on the biophysical cues of ECM in the native microenvironment can provide a more in-depth understanding of cell processes and develop better biomimetic platforms. In both PNS and CNS, the spatiotemporally dynamic nature of ECM composition and structure helps to regulate many neural processes including cell migration, differentiation, and regeneration. However, a clear relationship between composition and functional architecture still needs to be determined along with better understanding of surface topography functions. Knowledge on the topography related mechanobiological mechanisms will help to provide better understanding of biological processes, and to enhance the development of biomimetic substrates for neuronal differentiation. Through the use of biomimetic in vitro systems, the parameters of alignment, feature dimensions, temporal application and/or sequential application have been identified to be important for controlling the neuronal differentiation. Most works to optimize these systems have been done for the early stages of differentiation and have focused on the parameters of pattern alignment and dimensions. In general, anisotropic patterns tend to increase both the rate of differentiation and neuronal yield during early differentiation. Feature sizes resembling native structure dimensions have been identified as optimal. There are few studies that focus on later stages of differentiation. However, it has been shown that isotropic patterns were shown to be optimal for enhancing maturation indicating that patterns can be optimized temporally. The effect of topography was also shown to be additive, as sequential application of topography showed that cells have mechanical memory of past environments, which is a promising parameter for future optimization of biomimetic systems. Future work should also consider optimizing these parameters for not only neuronal differentiation of stem cells in to functional neuron cells but also the assembly and organization of neural organoids. While this review focused on how microenvironment signals, such as the biochemical composition and the ECM architecture, affect neuronal differentiation; subsequent development of biomimetic platforms should also investigate topography and other biophysical cues, such as substrate stiffness, in conjunction to produce systems closely resembling native microenvironment. Collectively, the knowledge gained from studying the functionality of native structures in a spatiotemporal manner for mature neuronal differentiation in conjunction with temporal behavior of topographies on stem cells will bring a step closer to fabricate systems capable of forming functional matured neurons.
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Dr. Rizwan Muhammad and Grace Pohan at University of Waterloo for editing this work and their invaluable feedback.
Author contributions: Literature search: DJ, SM; manuscript writing: DJ, SM, EKFY; manuscript editing: DJ, SM, EKFY, ELG.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Financial support: The work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery (NSERC 2016040; to DJ, SM and EKFY) and University of Waterloo start up fund (to DJ, SM and EKFY) for their generous funding. In addition, NSERC Undergraduate Student Research Awards (USRA; to SM and EKFY) and Collaborative Research and Training Experience (CREATE, 401207296; to SM and EKFY) for their generous partial funding.
Copyright license agreement: The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.
Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.
Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.
Open peer reviewers: Olga Kopach, University College London, UK; Amadi Ogonda Ihunwo, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Additional file: Open peer review reports 1 and 2[Additional file 1].
Funding: The work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery (NSERC 2016040; to DJ, SM and EKFY) and University of Waterloo start up fund (to DJ, SM and EKFY) for their generous funding. In addition, NSERC Undergraduate Student Research Awards (USRA; to SM and EKFY) and Collaborative Research and Training Experience (CREATE, 401207296; to SM and EKFY) for their generous partial funding.
| References|| |
Abbasi N, Hashemi SM, Salehi M, Jahani H, Mowla SJ, Soleimani M, Hosseinkhani H (2016) Influence of oriented nanofibrous PCL scaffolds on quantitative gene expression during neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 104:155-164.
Adams KL, Gallo V (2018) The diversity and disparity of the glial scar. Nat Neurosci 21:9-15.
Adarsh KG (1988) Evaluation of acellular and cellular nerve grafts in repair of rat peripheral nerve. J Neurosurg 68:117-123.
Anh Tuan N, Sharvari RS, Evelyn KFY (2016) From nano to micro: topographical scale and its impact on cell adhesion, morphology and contact guidance. J Phys Condens Matter 28:183001.
Ankam S, Lim CK, Yim EK (2015) Actomyosin contractility plays a role in MAP2 expression during nanotopography-directed neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials 47:20-28.
Ankam S, Teo BK, Kukumberg M, Yim EK (2013a) High throughput screening to investigate the interaction of stem cells with their extracellular microenvironment. Organogenesis 9:128-142.
Ankam S, Teo BK, Pohan G, Ho SW, Lim CK, Yim EK (2018) Temporal changes in nucleus morphology, lamin A/C and histone methylation during nanotopography-induced neuronal differentiation of stem cells. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 6:69.
Ankam S, Suryana M, Chan LY, Moe AA, Teo BK, Law JB, Sheetz MP, Low HY, Yim EK (2013b) Substrate topography and size determine the fate of human embryonic stem cells to neuronal or glial lineage. Acta Biomater 9:4535-4545.
Arranz AM, Perkins KL, Irie F, Lewis DP, Hrabe J, Xiao F, Itano N, Kimata K, Hrabetova S, Yamaguchi Y (2014) Hyaluronan deficiency due to has3 knock-out causes altered neuronal activity and seizures via reduction in brain extracellular space. J Neurosci 34:6164.
Avior Y, Sagi I, Benvenisty N (2016) Pluripotent stem cells in disease modelling and drug discovery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17:170.
Baiguera S, Del Gaudio C, Lucatelli E, Kuevda E, Boieri M, Mazzanti B, Bianco A, Macchiarini P (2014) Electrospun gelatin scaffolds incorporating rat decellularized brain extracellular matrix for neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials 35:1205-1214.
Bakhru S, Nain AS, Highley C, Wang J, Campbell P, Amon C, Zappe S (2011) Direct and cell signaling-based, geometry-induced neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells. Integr Biol (Camb) 3:1207-1214.
Bandtlow CE, Zimmermann DR (2000) Proteoglycans in the developing brain: new conceptual insights for old proteins. Physiol Rev 80:1267-1290.
Barnes JM, Przybyla L, Weaver VM (2017) Tissue mechanics regulate brain development, homeostasis and disease. J Cell Sci 130:71.
Barros CS, Franco SJ, Müller U (2011) Extracellular matrix: functions in the nervous system. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:a005108.
Béduer A, Vieu C, Arnauduc F, Sol JC, Loubinoux I, Vaysse L (2012) Engineering of adult human neural stem cells differentiation through surface micropatterning. Biomaterials 33:504-514.
Blumenthal NR, Hermanson O, Heimrich B, Shastri VP (2014) Stochastic nanoroughness modulates neuron–astrocyte interactions and function via mechanosensing cation channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:16124.
Bond Allison M, Ming GL, Song H (2015) Adult mammalian neural stem cells and neurogenesis: five decades later. Cell Stem Cell 17:385-395.
Busch SA, Silver J (2007) The role of extracellular matrix in CNS regeneration. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17:120-127.
Catala M, Kubis N (2013) Chapter 3 - Gross anatomy and development of the peripheral nervous system. In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology (Said G, Krarup C, eds), pp 29-41. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Cattin AL, Lloyd AC (2016) The multicellular complexity of peripheral nerve regeneration. Curr Opin Neurobiol 39:38-46.
Chambers SM, Fasano CA, Papapetrou EP, Tomishima M, Sadelain M, Studer L (2009) Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. Nat Biotechnol 27:275.
Chan LY, Birch WR, Yim EK, Choo AB (2013) Temporal application of topography to increase the rate of neural differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells. Biomaterials 34:382-392.
Chen P, Cescon M, Bonaldo P (2015) The role of collagens in peripheral nerve myelination and function. Mol Neurobiol 52:216-225.
Chen WH, Cheng SJ, Tzen JT, Cheng CM, Lin YW (2013) Probing relevant molecules in modulating the neurite outgrowth of hippocampal neurons on substrates of different stiffness. PLoS One 8:e83394.
Chernousov MA, Carey DJ ( 2000) Schwann cell extracellular matrix molecules and their receptors. Histol Histopathol 15:593-601.
Cho YI, Choi JS, Jeong SY, Yoo HS (2010) Nerve growth factor (NGF)-conjugated electrospun nanostructures with topographical cues for neuronal differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater 6:4725-4733.
Christopherson GT, Song H, Mao HQ (2009) The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation. Biomaterials 30:556-564.
Chua JS, Chng CP, Moe AA, Tann JY, Goh EL, Chiam KH, Yim EK (2014) Extending neurites sense the depth of the underlying topography during neuronal differentiation and contact guidance. Biomaterials 35:7750-7761.
Colognato H, Yurchenco PD (2000) Form and function: The laminin family of heterotrimers. Dev Dyn 218:213-234.
Colognato H, ffrench-Constant C, Feltri ML (2005) Human diseases reveal novel roles for neural laminins. Trends Neurosci 28:480-486.
de Miranda AS, Zhang CJ, Katsumoto A, Teixeira AL (2017) Hippocampal adult neurogenesis: Does the immune system matter? J Neurol Sci 372:482-495.
de Winter F, Kwok JCF, Fawcett JW, Vo TT, Carulli D, Verhaagen J (2016) The chemorepulsive protein semaphorin 3A and perineuronal net-mediated plasticity. Neural Plast 2016:14.
DeQuach JA, Yuan SH, Goldstein LS, Christman KL (2011) Decellularized porcine brain matrix for cell culture and tissue engineering scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A 17:2583-2592.
Dong L, Chen Y, Lewis M, Hsieh JC, Reing J, Chaillet JR, Howell CY, Melhem M, Inoue S, Kuszak JR, DeGeest K, Chung AE (2002) Neurologic defects and selective disruption of basement membranes in mice lacking entactin-1/Nidogen-1. Lab Invest 82:1617.
Dutta D, Heo I, Clevers H (2017) Disease modeling in stem cell-derived 3D organoid systems. Trends Mol Med 23:393-410.
Faissner A, Reinhard J (2015) The extracellular matrix compartment of neural stem and glial progenitor cells. Glia 63:1330-1349.
Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM (2010) The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci 123:4195.
Franze K (2013) The mechanical control of nervous system development. Development 140:3069.
Franze K, Janmey PA, Guck J (2013) Mechanics in neuronal development and repair. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 15:227-251.
Gattazzo F, Urciuolo A, Bonaldo P (2014) Extracellular matrix: A dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche. Biochim Biophys Acta 1840:2506-2519.
Giamanco KA, Morawski M, Matthews RT (2010) Perineuronal net formation and structure in aggrecan knockout mice. Neuroscience 170:1314-1327.
Girós A, Morante J, Gil-Sanz C, Fairén A, Costell M (2007) Perlecan controls neurogenesis in the developing telencephalon. BMC Dev Biol 7:29.
Gonçalves JT, Schafer ST, Gage FH (2016) Adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus: from stem cells to behavior. Cell 167:897-914.
Gonzalez-Perez F, Udina E, Navarro X (2013) Chapter ten - Extracellular matrix components in peripheral nerve regeneration. In: International Review of Neurobiology (Geuna S, Perroteau I, Tos P, Battiston B, eds), pp 257-275. Academic Press.
Halfter W, Dong S, Yip YP, Willem M, Mayer U (2002) A critical function of the pial basement membrane in cortical histogenesis. J Neurosci 22:6029.
Happel MFK, Frischknecht R (2016) Neuronal plasticity in the juvenile and adult brain regulated by the extracellular matrix. In: Composition and function of the extracellular matrix in the human body (Travascio F, ed). New York: ExLi4EvA.
Haubst N, Georges-Labouesse E, De Arcangelis A, Mayer U, Götz M (2006) Basement membrane attachment is dispensable for radial glial cell fate and for proliferation, but affects positioning of neuronal subtypes. Development 133:3245.
Herrera-Perez M, Voytik-Harbin SL, Rickus JL (2015) Extracellular matrix properties regulate the migratory response of glioblastoma stem cells in three-dimensional culture. Tissue Eng Part A 21:2572-2582.
Hill RE, Williams PE (2004) Perineurial cell basement membrane thickening and myelinated nerve fibre loss in diabetic and nondiabetic peripheral nerve. J Neurol Sci 217:157-163.
Hoffman-Kim D, Mitchel JA, Bellamkonda RV (2010) Topography, cell response, and nerve regeneration. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 12:203-231.
Höke A (2006) Mechanisms of disease: what factors limit the success of peripheral nerve regeneration in humans? Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2:448.
Hu BY, Zhang SC (2009) Differentiation of spinal motor neurons from pluripotent human stem cells. Nat Protoc 4:1295.
Huang B, Li G, Jiang XH (2015) Fate determination in mesenchymal stem cells: a perspective from histone-modifying enzymes. Stem Cell Res Ther 6:35.
Hudson TW, Zawko S, Deister C, Lundy S, Hu CY, Lee K, Schmidt CE (2004) Optimized acellular nerve graft is immunologically tolerated and supports regeneration. Tissue Eng 10:1641-1651.
Ide C, Tohyama K, Yokota R, Nitatori T, Onodera S (1983) Schwann cell basal lamina and nerve regeneration. Brain Res 288:61-75.
Jeon H, Simon CG Jr, Kim G (2014) A mini-review: Cell response to microscale, nanoscale, and hierarchical patterning of surface structure. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 102:1580-1594.
Jhala D, Vasita R (2015) A review on extracellular matrix mimicking strategies for an artificial stem cell niche. Polym Rev 55:561-595.
Jiang X, Cao HQ, Shi LY, Ng SY, Stanton LW, Chew SY (2012) Nanofiber topography and sustained biochemical signaling enhance human mesenchymal stem cell neural commitment. Acta Biomater 8:1290-1302.
Johnson PC, Brendel K, Meezan E (1981) Human diabetic perineurial cell basement membrane thickening. Lab Invest 44:265-270.
Junqueira LC, Montes GS, Krisztán RM (1979) The collagen of the vertebrate peripheral nervous system. Cell Tissue Res 202:453-460.
Kaplan HM, Mishra P, Kohn J (2015) The overwhelming use of rat models in nerve regeneration research may compromise designs of nerve guidance conduits for humans. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26:226.
Kazanis I, ffrench-Constant C (2011) Extracellular matrix and the neural stem cell niche. Dev Neurobiol 71:1006-1017.
Kerever A, Schnack J, Vellinga D, Ichikawa N, Moon C, Arikawa-Hirasawa E, Efird JT, Mercier F (2007) Novel extracellular matrix structures in the neural stem cell niche capture the neurogenic factor fibroblast growth factor 2 from the extracellular milieu. Stem Cells 25:2146-2157.
Keung AJ, de Juan-Pardo EM, Schaffer DV, Kumar S (2011) Rho GTPases mediate the mechanosensitive lineage commitment of neural stem cells. Stem Cells 29:1886-1897.
Kwok JC, Dick G, Wang D, Fawcett JW (2011) Extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in CNS repair. Dev Neurobiol 71:1073-1089.
Lau LW, Cua R, Keough MB, Haylock-Jacobs S, Yong VW (2013) Pathophysiology of the brain extracellular matrix: a new target for remyelination. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:722.
Lee MR, Kwon KW, Jung H, Kim HN, Suh KY, Kim K, Kim KS (2010) Direct differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into selective neurons on nanoscale ridge/groove pattern arrays. Biomaterials 31:4360-4366.
Lim SH, Liu XY, Song H, Yarema KJ, Mao HQ (2010) The effect of nanofiber-guided cell alignment on the preferential differentiation of neural stem cells. Biomaterials 31:9031-9039.
Lindvall O, Kokaia Z, Martinez-Serrano A (2004) Stem cell therapy for human neurodegenerative disorders–how to make it work. Nat Med 10:S42.
Lins LC, Wianny F, Livi S, Dehay C, Duchet-Rumeau J, Gérard JF (2017) Effect of polyvinylidene fluoride electrospun fiber orientation on neural stem cell differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105:2376-2393.
Long KR, Newland B, Florio M, Kalebic N, Langen B, Kolterer A, Wimberger P, Huttner WB (2018) Extracellular matrix components hapln1, lumican, and collagen I cause hyaluronic acid-dependent folding of the developing human neocortex. Neuron 99:702-719.e6.
Mahairaki V, Lim SH, Christopherson GT, Xu L, Nasonkin I, Yu C, Mao HQ, Koliatsos VE (2010) Nanofiber matrices promote the neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural precursors in vitro. Tissue Eng Part A 17:855-863.
Marcus M, Baranes K, Park M, Choi IS, Kang K, Shefi O (2017) Interactions of neurons with physical environments. Adv Healthc Mater 6:1700267.
Martino G, Pluchino S (2006) The therapeutic potential of neural stem cells. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:395.
Mecham RP (2001) Overview of extracellular matrix. Curr Protoc Cell Biol Chapter 10:Unit 10.1.
Mercier F (2016) Fractones: extracellular matrix niche controlling stem cell fate and growth factor activity in the brain in health and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 73:4661-4674.
Mercier F, Kitasako JT, Hatton GI (2003) Fractones and other basal laminae in the hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol 455:324-340.
Moe AA, Suryana M, Marcy G, Lim SK, Ankam S, Goh JZ, Jin J, Teo BK, Law JB, Low HY, Goh EL, Sheetz MP, Yim EK (2012) Microarray with micro- and nano-topographies enables identification of the optimal topography for directing the differentiation of primary murine neural progenitor cells. Small 8:3050-3061.
Mohtaram NK, Ko J, King C, Sun L, Muller N, Jun MB, Willerth SM (2015) Electrospun biomaterial scaffolds with varied topographies for neuronal differentiation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 103:2591-2601.
Montes GS, Bezerra MSF, Junqueira LCU (1984) Collagen distribution in tissues. In: Ultrastructure of the Connective Tissue Matrix (Ruggeri A, Motta PM, eds), pp 65-88. Boston, USA: Springer US.
Moore SA, Saito F, Chen J, Michele DE, Henry MD, Messing A, Cohn RD, Ross-Barta SE, Westra S, Williamson RA, Hoshi T, Campbell KP (2002) Deletion of brain dystroglycan recapitulates aspects of congenital muscular dystrophy. Nature 418:422.
Moore SW, Sheetz MP (2011) Biophysics of substrate interaction: Influence on neural motility, differentiation, and repair. Dev Neurobiol 71:1090-1101.
Mouw JK, Ou G, Weaver VM (2014) Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15:771.
Muhammad R, Peh GS, Adnan K, Law JB, Mehta JS, Yim EK (2015) Micro- and nano-topography to enhance proliferation and sustain functional markers of donor-derived primary human corneal endothelial cells. Acta Biomater 19:138-148.
Nguyen AT, Sathe SR, Yim EK (2016) From nano to micro: topographical scale and its impact on cell adhesion, morphology and contact guidance. J Phys Condens Matter 28:183001.
Nguyen AT, Mattiassi S, Loeblein M, Chin E, Ma D, Coquet P, Viasnoff V, Teo EH, Goh EL, Yim EK (2018) Human Rett-derived neuronal progenitor cells in 3D graphene scaffold as an in vitro platform to study the effect of electrical stimulation on neuronal differentiation. Biomed Mater 13:034111.
Norman JJ, Desai TA (2006) Methods for fabrication of nanoscale topography for tissue engineering scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng 34:89-101.
Omar MH, Kerrisk Campbell M, Xiao X, Zhong Q, Brunken WJ, Miner JH, Greer CA, Koleske AJ (2017) CNS neurons deposit laminin α5 to stabilize synapses. Cell Rep 21:1281-1292.
Pan F, Zhang M, Wu G, Lai Y, Greber B, Schöler HR, Chi L (2013) Topographic effect on human induced pluripotent stem cells differentiation towards neuronal lineage. Biomaterials 34:8131-8139.
Qi L, Li N, Huang R, Song Q, Wang L, Zhang Q, Su R, Kong T, Tang M, Cheng G (2013) The effects of topographical patterns and sizes on neural stem cell behavior. PLoS One 8:e59022.
Radner S, Banos C, Bachay G, Li YN, Hunter DD, Brunken WJ, Yee KT (2012) β2 and γ3 laminins are critical cortical basement membrane components: Ablation of Lamb2 and Lamc3 genes disrupts cortical lamination and produces dysplasia. Dev Neurobiol 73:209-229.
Rauch U (2004) Extracellular matrix components associated with remodeling processes in brain. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 61:2031-2045.
Recknor JB, Sakaguchi DS, Mallapragada SK (2006) Directed growth and selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells on micropatterned polymer substrates. Biomaterials 27:4098-4108.
Sathe S, Chan QX, Jin J, Bernitt E, Döbereiner HG, Yim KE (2017) Correlation and comparison of cortical and hippocampal neural progenitor morphology and differentiation through the use of micro- and nano-topographies. J Funct Biomater 8:E35.
Sawada Y, Tamada M, Dubin-Thaler BJ, Cherniavskaya O, Sakai R, Tanaka S, Sheetz MP (2006) Force sensing by mechanical extension of the Src family kinase substrate p130Cas. Cell 127:1015-1026.
Schuldiner M, Eiges R, Eden A, Yanuka O, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Goldstein RS, Benvenisty N (2001) Induced neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Brain Res 913:201-205.
Seppänen A, Suuronen T, Hofmann SC, Majamaa K, Alafuzoff I (2007) Distribution of collagen XVII in the human brain. Brain Res 1158:50-56.
Shellswell GB, Restall DJ, Duance VC, Bailey AJ (1979) Identification and differential distribution of collagen types in the central and peripheral nervous systems. FEBS Lett 106:305-308.
Shi Y, Inoue H, Wu JC, Yamanaka S (2016) Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16:115.
Simitzi C, Ranella A, Stratakis E (2017) Controlling the morphology and outgrowth of nerve and neuroglial cells: The effect of surface topography. Acta Biomater 51:21-52.
Sirko S, von Holst A, Wizenmann A, Götz M, Faissner A (2007) Chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycans control proliferation, radial glia cell differentiation and neurogenesis in neural stem/progenitor cells. Development 134:2727.
Sondell M, Lundborg G, Kanje M (1998) Regeneration of the rat sciatic nerve into allografts made acellular through chemical extraction. Brain Res 795:44-54.
Song L, Wang K, Li Y, Yang Y (2016) Nanotopography promoted neuronal differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 148:49-58.
Sridharan R, Reilly RB, Buckley CT (2015) Decellularized grafts with axially aligned channels for peripheral nerve regeneration. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 41:124-135.
Stukel JM, Willits RK (2015) Mechanotransduction of neural cells through cell-substrate interactions. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 22:173-182.
Sultana N, Mohd IH, Lim MM (2015) Composite synthetic scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Sun Y, Yong KMA, Villa-Diaz LG, Zhang X, Chen W, Philson R, Weng S, Xu H, Krebsbach PH, Fu J (2014) Hippo/YAP-mediated rigidity-dependent motor neuron differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Mater 13:599.
Tan KK, Tann JY, Sathe SR, Goh SH, Ma D, Goh EL, Yim EK (2015) Enhanced differentiation of neural progenitor cells into neurons of the mesencephalic dopaminergic subtype on topographical patterns. Biomaterials 43:32-43.
Tan KK, Lim WWM, Chai C, Kukumberg M, Lim KL, Goh EL, Yim EK (2018) Sequential application of discrete topographical patterns enhances derivation of functional mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep 8:9567.
Teo BK, Tan GD, Yim EK (2014) The synergistic effect of nanotopography and sustained dual release of hydrophobic and hydrophilic neurotrophic factors on human mesenchymal stem cell neuronal lineage commitment. Tissue Eng Part A 20:2151-2161.
Teo BK, Ankam S, Chan LY, Yim EK (2010) Chapter 11 - Nanotopography/mechanical induction of stem-cell differentiation. In: Methods in Cell Biology (Shivashankar GV, ed), pp 241-294. Academic Press.
Teo BK, Wong ST, Lim CK, Kung TY, Yap CH, Ramagopal Y, Romer LH, Yim EK (2013) Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase. ACS Nano 7:4785-4798.
Thomsen MS, Routhe LJ, Moos T (2017) The vascular basement membrane in the healthy and pathological brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 37:3300-3317.
Tian Z, Zhao Q, Biswas S, Deng W (2018) Methods of reactivation and reprogramming of neural stem cells for neural repair. Methods 133:3-20.
Tomita K, Madura T, Sakai Y, Yano K, Terenghi G, Hosokawa K (2013) Glial differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells: implications for cell-based transplantation therapy. Neuroscience 236:55-65.
Trounson A, McDonald C (2015) Stem cell therapies in clinical trials: progress and challenges. Cell Stem Cell 17:11-22.
Ushiki T, Ide C (1990) Three-dimensional organization of the collagen fibrils in the rat sciatic nerve as revealed by transmission- and scanning electron microscopy. Cell Tissue Res 260:175-184.
Wang J, Ye R, Wei Y, Wang H, Xu X, Zhang F, Qu J, Zuo B, Zhang H (2012) The effects of electrospun TSF nanofiber diameter and alignment on neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 100A:632-645.
Weiss P (1947) The problem of specificity in growth and development. Yale J Biol Med 19:235-278.
Wieringa PA, Gonçalves de Pinho AR, Micera S, van Wezel RJA, Moroni L (2018) Biomimetic architectures for peripheral nerve repair: a review of biofabrication strategies. Adv Healthc Mater 7:1701164.
Wong ST, Teo SK, Park S, Chiam KH, Yim EK (2014) Anisotropic rigidity sensing on grating topography directs human mesenchymal stem cell elongation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13:27-39.
Xie J, Willerth SM, Li X, Macewan MR, Rader A, Sakiyama-Elbert SE, Xia Y (2009) The differentiation of embryonic stem cells seeded on electrospun nanofibers into neural lineages. Biomaterials 30:354-362.
Yang C, Tibbitt MW, Basta L, Anseth KS (2014a) Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate. Nat Mater 13:645.
Yang F, Murugan R, Wang S, Ramakrishna S (2005) Electrospinning of nano/micro scale poly(L-lactic acid) aligned fibers and their potential in neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26:2603-2610.
Yang K, Jung K, Ko E, Kim J, Park KI, Kim J, Cho SW (2013) Nanotopographical manipulation of focal adhesion formation for enhanced differentiation of human neural stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:10529-10540.
Yang K, Jung H, Lee HR, Lee JS, Kim SR, Song KY, Cheong E, Bang J, Im SG, Cho SW (2014b) Multiscale, hierarchically patterned topography for directing human neural stem cells into functional neurons. ACS Nano 8:7809-7822.
Yim EK, Sheetz MP (2012) Force-dependent cell signaling in stem cell differentiation. Stem Cell Res Ther 3:41.
Yim EK, Pang SW, Leong KW (2007) Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. Exp Cell Res 313:1820-1829.
Yim EK, Darling EM, Kulangara K, Guilak F, Leong KW (2010) Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 31:1299-1306.
Yip AK, Nguyen AT, Rizwan M, Wong ST, Chiam KH, Yim EK (2018) Anisotropic traction stresses and focal adhesion polarization mediates topography-induced cell elongation. Biomaterials 181:103-112.
Yue B (2014) Biology of the extracellular matrix: an overview. J Glaucoma 23:S20-S23.
Zeng Y, Wong ST, Teo SK, Leong KW, Chiam KH, Yim EK (2018) Human mesenchymal stem cell basal membrane bending on gratings is dependent on both grating width and curvature. Sci Rep 8:6444.
Zimmermann DR, Dours-Zimmermann MT (2008) Extracellular matrix of the central nervous system: from neglect to challenge. Histochem Cell Biol 130:635-653.
P-Reviewers: Kopach O, Ihunwo AO; C-Editors: Zhao M, Yu J; T-Editor: Jia Y
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Fabrication and Characterization of Neurocompatible Ulvan-Based Layer-by-Layer Films
| ||Hee Chul Moon,Hyunwoo Choi,Stefanos Kikionis,Jeongyeon Seo,Wongu Youn,Efstathia Ioannou,Sang Yeong Han,Hyeoncheol Cho,Vassilios Roussis,Insung S. Choi |
| ||Langmuir. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Multi-Functionalized Self-Assembling Peptides as Reproducible 3D Cell Culture Systems Enabling Differentiation and Survival of Various Human Neural Stem Cell Lines
| ||Amanda Marchini,Chiara Favoino,Fabrizio Gelain |
| ||Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2020; 14 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Interfacing Neurons with Nanostructured Electrodes Modulates Synaptic Circuit Features
| ||Ana Domínguez-Bajo,Beatriz Loreto Rodilla,Ivo Calaresu,Ana Arché-Núñez,Ankor González-Mayorga,Denis Scaini,Lucas Pérez,Julio Camarero,Rodolfo Miranda,Elisa López-Dolado,María Teresa González,Laura Ballerini,María Concepción Serrano |
| ||Advanced Biosystems. 2020; : 2000117 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||High-Throughput Screening and Hierarchical Topography-Mediated Neural Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells
| ||Liangliang Yang,Klaudia Malgorzata Jurczak,Lu Ge,Patrick Rijn |
| ||Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2020; : 2000117 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||How Much Physical Guidance is Needed to Orient Growing Axons in 3D Hydrogels?
| ||Jonas C. Rose,David B. Gehlen,Abdolrahman Omidinia-Anarkoli,Maaike Fölster,Tamás Haraszti,Esther E. Jaekel,Laura De Laporte |
| ||Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2020; : 2000886 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|