|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 242-246
Possible implications of dysregulated nicotinic acetylcholine receptor diffusion and nanocluster formation in myasthenia gravis
Francisco J Barrantes
Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED) UCA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
|Date of Submission||16-Feb-2020|
|Date of Decision||19-Feb-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||06-May-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||24-Aug-2020|
Francisco J Barrantes
Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED) UCA-CONICET, Buenos Aires
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Myasthenia gravis is a rare and invalidating disease affecting the neuromuscular junction of voluntary muscles. The classical form of this autoimmune disease is characterized by the presence of antibodies against the most abundant protein in the neuromuscular junction, the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Other variants of the disease involve autoimmune attack of non-receptor scaffolding proteins or enzymes essential for building or maintaining the integrity of this peripheral synapse. This review summarizes the participation of the above proteins in building the neuromuscular junction and the destruction of this cholinergic synapse by autoimmune aggression in myasthenia gravis. The review also covers the application of a powerful biophysical technique, superresolution optical microscopy, to image the nicotinic receptor in live cells and follow its motional dynamics. The hypothesis is entertained that anomalous nanocluster formation by antibody crosslinking may lead to accelerated endocytic internalization and elevated turnover of the receptor, as observed in myasthenia gravis.
Keywords: agrin; autoimmune diseases; muscle end-plate; muscle specific kinase; MuSK; myasthenia gravis; nanoscopy; neuromuscular junction; nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; rapsyn; superresolution microscopy
|How to cite this article:|
Barrantes FJ. Possible implications of dysregulated nicotinic acetylcholine receptor diffusion and nanocluster formation in myasthenia gravis. Neural Regen Res 2021;16:242-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Barrantes FJ. Possible implications of dysregulated nicotinic acetylcholine receptor diffusion and nanocluster formation in myasthenia gravis. Neural Regen Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2020 Oct 24];16:242-6. Available from: http://www.nrronline.org/text.asp?2021/16/2/242/290880
| Introduction|| |
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease affecting the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) of voluntary muscles. The NMJ, also known as muscle end-plate, is a peripheral nervous system synapse activated by the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Most cases of MG involve loss of the most abundant protein in the NMJ, the receptor for this neurotransmitter, i.e. the muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR). A predominant clinical manifestation of the MG disorder is fatigability associated with fluctuating muscle weakness, involving predominantly ocular, limb, and respiratory muscles (Burke et al., 2004; Sieb, 2014; Verschuuren et al., 2016). Muscle weakness (de Meel et al., 2019) worsens with activity and improves with rest (Behin and Le Panse, 2018) as a consequence of dysfunctional neuromuscular transmission, with diminution of the so-called safety factor (Serra et al., 2012). The latter is in turn largely due to disruption of the postsynaptic apparatus and to a lesser extent perturbation of normal neurotransmitter binding to the receptor owing to the steric hindrance imposed by antibody binding.
The muscle functional defects in some forms of MG show bulbar involvement: difficulties in swallowing, speech, respiration or muscle-driven eye movement (Burke et al., 2004; Barnett et al., 2014).
The nAChR is the paradigm member of the neurotransmitter receptors belonging to the superfamily of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (Zoli et al., 2018), which includes the families of various other neurotransmitter receptors such as γ-aminobutyric acid type A or C receptors, glycine receptors, subtype 3 of the serotonin receptor families and glutamate-gated chloride channels (Barrantes 2015; Nemecz et al., 2016). The literature for this review was identified by searches of the PubMed database in the last two decades up to April 2020.
| Formation and Maintenance of the Neuromuscular Junction|| |
The efficient functioning of the NMJ is ensured by the appropriate number of nAChRs and their very high density. To achieve this appropriate number and distribution of receptors confined in the synaptic region, which occupies only ~0.1% of the muscle cell surface, a complex series of processes takes place during ontogenetic development and postnatal life. These processes involve the orchestrated participation of various proteins in two cascades, one transcriptional and the other post-translational (Sanes and Lichtman, 2001). The agrin-Lrp4-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) signaling cascade is the master player in the establishment and maintenance of the NMJ, with other receptor-anchoring and scaffolding proteins also playing a role (Burden et al., 2018).
Agrin is a heparan sulfate proteoglycan ~200 kDa protein residing in the extracellular matrix, with three laminin-G-like domains and four epidermal growth factor-like domains contained in the carboxy-terminal half of the protein. The laminin-binding motif is responsible for tethering Agrin to the synaptic basal lamina. Agrin has many splice variants in different tissues. Neural agrin is synthesized by neurons and secreted at nerve terminals. One splice variant is Z8, specific to motor neurons and released by presynaptic nerve terminals at the end-plate region. It is this isoform that participates actively in nAChR aggregation and clustering at the NMJ, initially identified by McMahan (1990) in the Torpedo electromotor synapse. nAChR clusters are absent in agrin-knockout animals, that are unable to form NMJs (Gautam et al., 1996). The latter studies gave rise to the idea that agrin is a critical organizer of the NMJ. Agrin is also involved in inter-neuronal synaptogenesis, e.g., in synapse formation between cholinergic preganglionic axons and sympathetic neurons in the superior cervical ganglion (Gingras et al., 2002).
MuSK is a tyrosine kinase essential for the formation and maintenance of the NMJ. The role played by phosphorylation in synaptic plasticity (Swope et al., 1992) together with the observation that phosphotyrosine staining in muscle fibers was concentrated at the NMJ led Swope and Huganir (1993) to identify this new kinase in Torpedo electrocytes. As with agrin-null mice (Gautam et al., 1996), MuSK–/– mutant mice form neither nAChR clusters nor NMJs (DeChiara et al., 1997) and die at birth of respiratory failure, mimicking one of the outcomes of severe forms of MG in humans. Phosphorylation of a tyrosine amino acid residue in the MuSK juxtamembrane region requires recruitment of an adapter protein, downstream of kinase-7 (Dok-7), promoting recruitment of two further adapters, Crk and Crk-L, to two tyrosine phosphorylated motifs in the carboxy-terminal region of Dok-7 (Bergamin et al., 2010). Stimulation of MuSK by agrin activates two small GTPases, Rac and Rho, which participate in the formation of nAChR micro- and macroclusters in cultured myotubes (Weston et al., 2003). An additional kinase, Cdc42, intervenes in the agrin-mediated nAChR clustering together with Rac (Weston et al., 2000).
Agrin does not establish direct contact with MuSK; this intermediary role is played by a protein called low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (Lrp4, a single-pass transmembrane protein; Koneczny et al., 2013). Lrp4 is the receptor for agrin and is expressed specifically in myotubes (Kim et al., 2008). It binds to neuronal agrin (Weatherbee et al., 2006), thus integrating the agrin-Lrp4-MuSK signaling cascade involved in nAChR clustering (Zhang et al., 2008). Lrp4 mutant mice die at birth due to respiratory failure (Weatherbee et al., 2006). Lrp4 is also critical for NMJ maintenance (Barik et al., 2014) and plays a role in the central nervous system, where the cascade consists of the agrin-Lrp4-Ror2 signaling system, regulating adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus (Zhang et al., 2019).
Rapsyn is another protein that plays a key role in NMJ development and nAChR clustering and stabilization at the synapse (Noakes et al., 1993). Originally termed 43K protein (Sealock, 1982), rapsyn is a peripheral, cytoplasmic membrane protein whose main role is to act as a scaffold for the nAChR protein. Rapsyn is one of the three proteins known to interact with the nAChR directly, as do adenomatous coli polyposis protein (Farias et al., 2007) and src-family tyrosine protein kinases like Fyn, Fyk, and Src, which are activated by and form a complex with rapsyn (Mohamed and Swope, 1999). Rapsyn is a substrate of these kinases, which phosphorylate the β and δ subunits of the nAChR molecule and are involved in the anchoring of the nAChR to the cytoskeleton (Mohamed and Swope, 1999). Coupling between MuSK and the src-family kinases in vivo is mediated by a phosphotyrosine-SH2 domain interaction. Src and Fyn phosphorylate MuSK (Mohamed et al., 2001).
Recently a protein called microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 (MACF1), a scaffolding protein with binding sites for microtubules and actin, was found to be concentrated at the NMJ. MACF1 binds rapsyn and serves as a synaptic organizer for the microtubule-associated proteins EB1 and MAP1b, and the actin-associated protein, vinculin. MACF1 plays an important role in maintaining synaptic differentiation and efficient synaptic transmission in mice (Oury et al., 2019). Actin and actin-associated proteins involved in F-actin polymerization, such as cortactin and an Arp2/3 complex, are enriched at nAChR clusters in cultured muscle cells (Weston et al., 2007) and are activated by MuSK. The precise mechanisms involved remain poorly understood.
| The Cascade in Action|| |
The agrin-Lrp4-MuSK cascade is initiated by nerve-released (neuronal) agrin binding to Lrp4 to form an heterodimer, and subsequently a tetramer composed of two heterodimers (Zong et al., 2012). This tetrameric species is necessary for the next step, the activation of MuSK (Moore et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2006), which in turn recruits Dok-7, the adaptor protein located at the cytoplasmic compartment of the postsynaptic cell.
Dok-7 is a cytoplasmic protein selectively expressed in skeletal and heart muscle that binds a tyrosine phosphorylated site in MuSK and acts downstream of the latter. Mice lacking this protein are not able to form nAChR clusters or NMJs (Okada et al., 2006). Dok-7 is also involved in activating MuSK, playing the role of a ligand that stabilizes and induces MuSK tyrosine phosphorylation. MuSK activation induces the aggregation of nAChR molecules at the end-plate region. Lrp4 is also concentrated and anchored in the postsynaptic membrane as a consequence of MuSK signaling, and acts as a retrograde signal for presynaptic differentiation (Yumoto et al., 2012). Rapsyn, also located in the postsynaptic cytoplasmic compartments, anchors the nAChR via the intracytoplasmic domain of the latter.
The post-natal, developing vertebrate neuromuscular synapse resulting from this complex architectural construction is still immature. Oval shaped, these “plaques” do not form a tightly-packed nAChR continuum but exhibit nAChR-poor areas (“perforations”) containing, surprisingly, proteins typically present in podosomes (Proszynski et al., 2009). Since these podosomes are located underneath nAChR clusters that subsequently become perforated, these authors speculated that the podosomes are involved in remodeling the nAChR clusters as the synapse develops. When podosomes disappear, nAChRs diffuse to these ghost areas. Once formed, the neuromuscular synapse matures over a 3-week post-natal period, during which its size increases between 4- to 5-fold, and the oval shape plaque-like aggregate of nAChRs is sculpted to the typical pretzel-shaped structure with a high density of nAChRs characteristic of the mature NMJ. This is by no means a static structure; nAChRs as well as other molecular constituents of the synapse are continuously being removed and reinserted in the mature synapse, with characteristic lifetimes.
| Pathophysiology of the Neuromuscular Junction in Myasthenia|| |
Let us first focus on “classical” MG, the one generated by autoantibodies against the nAChR. Patients with this form of the disease present antibodies in ~85% of cases, although antibody titers do not necessarily correlate with the severity of the disease (Vincent and Newsom-Davis, 1985; Aurangzeb et al., 2009).
The pathophysiology of autoantibody-mediated loss of receptors in the classical anti-nAChR form of MG involves a) blockage of neuromuscular transmission by autoantibody binding to the nAChR; b) enhanced endocytosis; endocytic internalization of the nAChR-autoantibody crosslinked complex and subsequent lysosomal degradation (Borroni et al., 2007; Kumari et al., 2008); c) complement-induced destruction of the NMJ; d) “functional” loss of nAChRs. Let us dissect these various steps.
a) Blockage of neuromuscular transmission by anti-nAChR autoantibody binding occurs at a characteristic site called the main immunogenic region, constituted by a loop of amino acids 66–76 on the α1 receptor subunit (Tzartos et al., 1988). IgG antibodies of the IgG1 and IgG1–3 subclass are characteristically associated with classical anti-nAChR MG. They can activate the complement system, in contrast to the IgG4 subclass. These antibodies, therefore, constitute the first link in the chain of events leading to C3 activation and cleavage of the downstream components in the complement cascade.
b) Enhanced endocytic internalization of the nAChR-autoantibody crosslinked complex and subsequent lysosomal degradation (Borroni et al., 2007; Kumari et al., 2008). The exact cause of this phenomenon is not known. A multiplicity of factors may contribute to this process; we have found for instance that cholesterol depletion from the cell surface can significantly accelerate receptor internalization and even change the endocytic route (Borroni et al., 2007; Borroni and Barrantes, 2011).
c) Complement-induced destruction of the end-plate folds by the formation and deposit of the membrane attack complex, initially leading to partial loss of the postsynaptic folds (Burke et al., 2004) and ultimately to total destruction of the NMJ (Verschuuren et al., 1992). In “classical” MG, autoantibodies to the nAChR bind to the postsynaptic receptors and activate the canonical complement pathway, leading to the formation of the membrane attack complex and the resulting destruction of the NMJ (Verschuuren et al., 2016; Paz and Barrantes 2019). Under physiological conditions, the complement is an important component of the immune system, playing a key role in innate and antibody-mediated immunity. The complement is tightly regulated in its pro- and anti-inflammatory effects, but disruption of this equilibrium can provoke tissue damage in autoimmune diseases like MG or rheumatoid arthritis (Holers and Banda, 2018); under such pathological conditions, activation and amplification of the complement system results in the formation of membrane attack complexes involving lipophilic proteins that damage cell membranes (Howard, 2018).
d) In contrast to the actual disappearance of nAChRs by the autoimmune attack on the NMJ, “functional” loss of receptors implies interference with the binding of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine to the agonist recognition sites on the nAChR by the anti-nAChR antibodies. This is so because the agonist binding sites are located at the interface between each α1 subunit and a non-α1 subunit, relatively close to the main immunogenic region on the nAChR α1 receptor subunit (Tzartos et al., 1988; Luo et al., 2009). Human IgG antibodies comprise four classes (1–4).
Anti-MuSK autoimmune MG is the second most frequent (~6%) form of the disease, mediated by autoantibodies against the muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) (Morsch et al., 2012; Rivner et al., 2018). The anti-MuSK form of the disease is often severe when there is bulbar involvement but milder in non-bulbar variants (Verschuuren et al., 2013; Rivner et al., 2018). The sequence of events described for the autoantibody-induced disappearance of nAChR from the end-plate region does not occur in the case of anti-MuSK autoantibodies, which belong to the IgG4 class of immunoglobulins and do not induce activation of the complement system (Leite et al., 2008; Verschuuren et al., 2013). IgG4 autoantibodies cause MG symptoms by a different physiopathological mechanism: they interfere with the interaction between MuSK and Lrp4, thereby inhibiting the phosphorylation of MuSK normally induced by agrin (Huijbers et al., 2019).
Patients lacking both anti-nAChR and anti-MuSK constitute less than 10% of the total and are considered “seronegative MG” cases by currently available diagnostic immunological tests, although their neurological symptomatology and response to treatment are in some cases similar to those of “classical” anti-nAChR MG patients. Variants of MACF1, the protein that links rapsyn to the microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton (Oury et al., 2019), are associated with congenital myasthenia in humans.
The disruption of the agrin-Lrp4-MuSK cascade precludes agrin-induced nAChR clustering at the end-plate region, as is the case e.g., with anti-Lrp4 myasthenia (Shen et al., 2013) or anti-MuSK myasthenia (Koneczny et al., 2013).
Some seronegative MG patients present anti-nAChR antibodies only against aggregated/clustered forms of the receptor (Leite et al., 2008). This observation raises interesting questions as to the role played by the supramolecular organization of the nAChR in the physiopathology of MG: do receptors in the mature synapse need to disaggregate to generate an immune response? Does the distribution of the nAChR play a role in antibody binding? Conversely, does antibody binding change receptor properties?
Interrogation of these issues is strongly aided by visualization of the receptor in its natural environment, the plasma membrane, using biophysical techniques. We initially addressed this subject by imaging cells expressing adult muscle-type nAChR robustly expressed at the cell surface of CHO-K1/A5 cells, a clonal cell line developed in our laboratory (Roccamo et al., 1999), interrogated with stimulated emission depletion superresolution microscopy (Kellner et al., 2007). This study constituted the first description by optical microscopy beyond the diffraction limit of a neurotransmitter receptor distribution. nAChR aggregates of nanoscopic dimensions (“nanoclusters” of 70–90 nm in diameter) could be directly imaged by stimulated emission depletion superresolution microscopy.
More recently, using stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy, a form of single-molecule localization superresolution microscopy, we could go beyond the static visualization of nAChR nanoclusters. In combination with single-molecule tracking techniques, we were able to follow the motional properties of individual nAChRs labeled with fluorescent α-bungarotoxin (Mosqueira et al., 2018) and compare these motional regimes with those of mAb35-labeled receptors. We selected mAb35, one of the monoclonal antibodies produced by Lindstrom and colleagues (Tzartos et al., 1981) to induce MG experimentally in an animal model of the disease (Tzartos and Lindstrom, 1980). This antibody competes with ~65% of human antibodies found in MG patients (Lindstrom et al., 1982). The behavior of mAb35 is thus presumed to resemble that of the pathogenic autoantibodies found in the human disease. In vitro, MG antibodies have been shown to bind divalently to the nAChR, presumably via the two α-subunits of adjacent receptor monomers and thus crosslink receptors (Paz and Barrantes, 2019). Indeed, we were able to experimentally observe that antibody tagging modified the translational diffusion of the nAChR (Mosqueira et al., 2020): diffusion of the fluorescent antibody-labeled receptor differed from the diffusion of the receptor labeled with fluorescent α-bungarotoxin (Mosqueira et al., 2018). The most obvious explanation is that upon antibody (multivalent ligand) binding, antibody-induced crosslinking affects the translational motion of the receptor macromolecule, which spends longer periods in a confined state. The size of the dynamic nAChR nanoclusters also differed between toxin- and antibody-labeled receptors [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Schematic diagram showing the diffusion of an nAChR molecule in the plane of the membrane, as followed with the stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy single-molecule localization superresolution microscopy technique.|
An acetylcholine receptor (red dot) trajectory (black line) is shown to undergo alternating free-walk steps and sojourns of relative immobilization, i.e., a two-state switching behavior combining free Brownian walks and confinement. The latter transient stop-overs occur in nanometer-sized domains (~34 nm radius) with average lifetimes of ~400 ms within zones of high obstacle density (purple colored circles) where several nAChR are clustered, forming pickets that hinder diffusion of their own species. Furthermore, nAChR molecules are transiently trapped and immobilized in larger areas (~150–220 nm radius, green circle) for longer periods of 11 ± 1 seconds, which are affected by the cholesterol content of the membrane. The actin sub-membrane meshwork constitutes an additional source of hindrance to the lateral mobility of the receptors. Adapted from Mosqueira et al., 2018, 2020. nAChR: Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.
Click here to view
We can speculate that these biophysical observations bear relevance to two phenomena: 1) the single molecule to nanocluster transition that occurs at embryonic stages along the ontogenetic development of the NMJ (Sanes and Lichtman, 2001) and 2) nAChR-antibody interactions in the autoimmune disease MG. Early studies showed that myasthenic antibodies crosslinking nAChR augment the internalization of the receptor (Drachman et al., 1978). We have shown that mAb35 accelerates the endocytic internalization of nAChRs in the CHO-K1/A5 cell line and in C2C12 developing myotubes (Kumari et al., 2008), which, as discussed above, is one of the physiopathological hallmarks of the autoantibody-mediated nAChR disappearance from the NMJ (Fumagalli et al., 1982).
Challenges remain ahead in the field of MG, mostly in relation to the need to develop more sensitive diagnostic tools for the unambiguous identification of MG patients, particularly of seronegative patients, and above all, the development of new therapeutic tools for the treatment of this rare and invalidating disease (Fugger et al., 2020; Lazaridis and Tzartos 2020).
Author contributions: The author wrote the manuscript independently and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of interest: The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Financial support: None.
Copyright license agreement: The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by the author before publication.
Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.
Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.
| References|| |
Almarza G, Sánchez F, Barrantes FJ (2014) Transient cholesterol effects on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor cell-surface mobility. PLoS One 9:e100346.
Aurangzeb S, Tariq M, Irshad M, Badshah M, Khan RS (2009) Relationship between anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody titres and severity of myasthenia gravis. J Pak Med Assoc 59:289-292.
Barik A, Lu Y, Sathyamurthy A, Bowman A, Shen C, Li L, Xiong WC, Mei L (2014) LRP4 is critical for neuromuscular junction maintenance. J Neurosci 34:13892-13905.
Barnett C, Bril V, Kapral M, Kulkarni A, Davis AM (2014) A conceptual framework for evaluating impairments in myasthenia gravis. PLoS One 9:e98089.
Barrantes FJ (2015) Phylogenetic conservation of protein–lipid motifs in pentameric ligand-gated ion channels. Biochim Biophys Acta 1848:1796-1805.
Behin A, Le Panse R (2018) New pathways and therapeutic targets in autoimmune myasthenia gravis. J Neuromuscul Dis 5:265-277.
Bergamin E, Hallock PT, Burden SJ, Hubbard SR (2010) The cytoplasmic adaptor protein Dok7 activates the receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK via dimerization. Mol Cell 39:100-109.
Borroni V, Baier CJ, Lang T, Bonini I, White MM, Garbus I, Barrantes FJ (2007) Cholesterol depletion activates rapid internalization of submicron-sized acetylcholine receptor domains at the cell membrane. Mol Membr Biol 24:1-15.
Borroni V, Barrantes FJ (2011) Cholesterol modulates the rate and mechanism of acetylcholine receptor internalization. J Biol Chem 286:17122-17132.
Burden SJ, Fuhrer C, Hubbard SR (2003) Agrin/MuSK signaling: willing and Abl. Nat Neurosci 6:653-654.
Burden SJ, Huijbers MG, Remedio L (2018) Fundamental molecules and mechanisms for forming and maintaining neuromuscular synapses. Int J Mol Sci 19:490.
Burke G, Cossins J, Maxwell S, Robb S, Nicolle M, Vincent A, Newsom-Davis J, Palace J, Beeson D (200) Distinct phenotypes of congenital acetylcholine receptor deficiency. Neuromuscul Disord 14:356-364.
de Meel RHP, Tannemaat MR, Verschuuren JJGM (2019) Heterogeneity and shifts in distribution of muscle weakness in myasthenia gravis. Neuromuscul Disord 29:664-670.
DeChiara TM, Bowen DC, Valenzuela DM, Simmons MV, Poueymirou WT, Thomas S, Kinetz E, Compton DL, Rojas E, Park JS, Smith C, DiStefano PS, Glass DJ, Burden SJ, Yancopoulos GD (1997) The receptor tyrosine kinase muSK is required for neuromuscular junction formation in vivo. Cell 85:501-512.
Drachman DB, Angus CW, Adams RN, Michelson JD, Hoffman GJ (1978) Myasthenic antibodies cross-link acetylcholine receptors to accelerate degradation. N Engl J Med 298:1116-1122.
Farías GG, Vallés AS, Colombres M, Godoy JA, Toledo EM, Lukas RJ, Barrantes FJ, Inestrosa NC (2007) Wnt-7a induces presynaptic colocalization of alpha 7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and adenomatous polyposis coli in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 27:5313-5325.
Faustino Martins JM, Fischer C, Urzi A, Vidal R, Kunz S, Ruffault PL, Kabuss L, Hube I, Gazzerro E, Birchmeier C, Spuler S, Sauer S, Gouti M (2020) Self-organizing 3D human trunk neuromuscular organoids. Cell Stem Cell 26:172-186.
Fugger L, Jensen LT, Rossjohn J (2020) Challenges, progress, and prospects of developing therapies to treat autoimmune diseases. Cell 181:63-80.
Gautam M, Noakes PG, Moscoso L, Rupp F, Scheller RH, Merlie JP, Sanes JR (1996) Defective neuromuscular synaptogenesis in agrin-deficient mutant mice. Cell 85:525-535.
Gingras J, Rassadi S, Cooper E, Ferns M (2002) Agrin plays an organizing role in the formation of sympathetic synapses. J Cell Biol 158:1109-1118.
Holers VM, Banda NK (2018) Complement in the initiation and evolution of rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol 9:1057.
Howard JF Jr (2018) Myasthenia gravis: the role of complement at the neuromuscular junction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1412:113-128.
Huijbers MG, Vergoossen DL, Fillié-Grijpma YE, van Es IE, Koning MT, Slot LM, Veelken H, Plomp JJ, van der Maarel SM, Verschuuren JJ (2019) MuSK myasthenia gravis monoclonal antibodies: Valency dictates pathogenicity. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 6:e547.
Kellner RR, Baier CJ, Willig KI, Hell SW, Barrantes FJ (2007) Nanoscale organization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors revealed by stimulated emission depletion microscopy. Neuroscience 144:135-143.
Kim N, Stiegler AL, Cameron TO, Hallock PT, Gomez AM, Huang JH, Hubbard SR, Dustin ML, Burden SJ (2008) Lrp4 is a receptor for Agrin and forms a complex with MuSK. Cell 135:334-342.
Koneczny I, Cossins J, Waters P, Beeson D, Vincent A (2013) MuSK myasthenia gravis IgG4 disrupts the interaction of LRP4 with MuSK but both IgG4 and IgG1-3 can disperse preformed agrin-independent AChR clusters. PLoS One 8:e80695.
Kumari S, Borroni V, Chaudhry A, Chanda B, Massol R, Mayor S, Barrantes FJ (2008) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is internalized via a Rac-dependent, dynamin-independent endocytic pathway. J Cell Biol 181:1179-1193.
Lazaridis K, Tzartos SJ (2020) Autoantibody specificities in myasthenia gravis; implications for improved diagnostics and therapeutics. Front Immunol 11:212.
Leite MI, Jacob S, Viegas S, Cossins J, Clover L, Morgan BP, Beeson D, Willcox N, Vincent A (2008) IgG1 antibodies to acetylcholine receptors in ‘seronegative’ myasthenia gravis. Brain 131:1940-1952.
Lindstrom J, Tzartos S, Gullick W (1982) Structure and function of acetylcholine receptors studied using monoclonal antibodies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 377:1-19.
Luo J, Taylor P, Losen M, de Baets MH, Shelton GD, Lindstrom J (2009) Main immunogenic region structure promotes binding of conformation-dependent myasthenia gravis autoantibodies, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor conformation maturation, and agonist sensitivity. J Neurosci 29:13898-13908.
McMahan UJ (1990) The agrin hypothesis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55:407-418.
Mohamed AS, Rivas-Plata KA, Kraas JR, Saleh SM, Swope SL (2001) Src-class kinases act within the agrin/MuSK pathway to regulate acetylcholine receptor phosphorylation, cytoskeletal anchoring, and clustering. J Neurosci 21:3806-3818.
Mohamed AS, Swope SL (1999) Phosphorylation and cytoskeletal anchoring of the acetylcholine receptor by Src class protein-tyrosine kinases. Activation by rapsyn. J Biol Chem 274:20529-20539.
Moore C, Leu M, Müller U, Brenner HR (2001) Induction of multiple signaling loops by MuSK during neuromuscular synapse formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:14655-14660.
Morsch M, Reddel SW, Ghazanfari N, Toyka KV, Phillips WD (2012) Muscle specific kinase autoantibodies cause synaptic failure through progressive wastage of postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors. Exp Neurol 237:286-295.
Mosqueira A, Camino PA, Barrantes FJ (2018) Cholesterol modulates acetylcholine receptor diffusion by tuning confinement sojourns and nanocluster stability. Sci Rep 8:11974.
Mosqueira A, Camino PA, Barrantes FJ (2020) Antibody-induced crosslinking and cholesterol-sensitive, anomalous diffusion of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Neurochem 152:663-674.
Nemecz Á, Prevost MS, Menny A, Corringer PJ (2016) Emerging molecular mechanisms of signal transduction in pentameric ligand-gated ion channels. Neuron 90:452-470.
Noakes PG, Phillips WD, Hanley TA, Sanes JR, Merlie JP (1993) 43K protein and acetylcholine receptors colocalize during the initial stages of neuromuscular synapse formation in vivo. Dev Biol 155:275-280.
Okada K, Inoue A, Okada M, Murata Y, Kakuta S, Jigami T, Kubo S, Shiraishi H, Eguchi K, Motomura M, Akiyama T, Iwakura Y, Higuchi O, Yamanashi Y (2006) The muscle protein Dok-7 is essential for neuromuscular synaptogenesis. Science 312:1802-1805.
Todorovic S, Hoedt E, Preethish-Kumar V, Neubert TA, Lin W, Lochmüller H, Burden SJ (2019) MACF1 links Rapsyn to microtubule- and actin-binding proteins to maintain neuromuscular synapses. J Cell Biol 218:1686-1705.
Paz ML, Barrantes FJ (2019) Autoimmune attack of the neuromuscular junction in myasthenia gravis: nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and other targets. ACS Chem Neurosci 10:2186-2194.
Proszynski TJ, Gingras J, Valdez G, Krzewski K, Sanes J (2009) Podosomes are present in a postsynaptic apparatus and participate in its maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:18373-18378.
Rivner MH, Pasnoor M, Dimachkie MM, Barohn RJ, Mei L (2018) Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase and myasthenia gravis owing to other antibodies. Neurol Clin 36:293-310.
Roccamo AM, Pediconi MF, Aztiria E, Zanello L, Wolstenholme A, Barrantes FJ (1999) Cells defective in sphingolipids biosynthesis express low amounts of muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Eur J Neurosci 11:1615-1623.
Sanes JR, Lichtman JW (2001) Induction, assembly, maturation and maintenance of a postsynaptic apparatus. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:791-805.
Sealock R (1982) Cytoplasmic surface structure in postsynaptic membranes from electric tissue visualized by tannic-acid-mediated negative contrasting. J Cell Biol 92:514-522.
Serra A, Ruff RL, Leigh RJ (2012) Neuromuscular transmission failure in myasthenia gravis: decrement of safety factor and susceptibility of extraocular muscles. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1275:129-135.
Shen C, Lu Y, Zhang B, Figueiredo D, Bean J, Jung J, Wu H, Barik A, Yin DM, Xiong WC, Mei L (2013) Antibodies against low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 induce myasthenia gravis. J Clin Invest 123:5190-5202.
Sieb JP (2014) Myasthenia gravis: an update for the clinician. Clin Exp Immunol 175:408-418.
Swope SL, Huganir RL (1993) Molecular cloning of two abundant protein tyrosine kinases in Torpedo electric organ that associate with the acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem 268:25152-25161.
Swope SL, Moss SJ, Blackstone CD, Huganir RL (1992) Phosphorylation of ligand-gated ion channels: a possible mode of synaptic plasticity. FASEB J 6:2514-2523.
Tzartos SJ, Kokla A, Walgrave SL, Conti-Tronconi BM (1988) Localization of the main immunogenic region of human muscle acetylcholine receptor to residues 67-76 of the a subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85:2899-2903.
Tzartos SJ, Lindstrom JM (1980) Monoclonal antibodies used to probe acetylcholine receptor structure: localization of the main immunogenic region and detection of similarities between subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77:755-759.
Tzartos SJ, Rand DE, Einarson BL, Lindstrom JM (1981) Mapping of surface structures of electrophorus acetylcholine receptor using monoclonal antibodies. J Biol Chem 256:8635-8645.
Verschuuren J, Strijbos E, Vincent A (2016) Neuromuscular junction disorders. Handb Clin Neurol 133:447-466.
Verschuuren JJ, Graus YM, Theunissen RO, Yamamoto T, Vincent A, van Breda Vriesman PJ, De Baets MH (1992) Role of acetylcholine receptor antibody complexes in muscle in experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis. J Neuroimmunol 36:117-125.
Verschuuren JJ, Huijbers MG, Plomp JJ, Niks EH, Molenaar PC, Martinez-Martinez P, Gomez AM, De Baets MH, Losen M (2013) Pathophysiology of myasthenia gravis with antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor, muscle-specific kinase and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4. Autoimmun Rev 12:918-923.
Vincent A, Newsom-Davis J (1985) Acetylcholine receptor antibody characteristics in myasthenia gravis. III. Patients with low anti-AChR antibody levels. Clin Exp Immunol 60:631-636.
Wang Q, Zhang B, Xiong WC, Mei L (2006) MuSK signaling at the neuromuscular junction. J Mol Neurosci 30:223-226.
Weatherbee SD, Anderson KV, Niswander LA (2006) LDL-receptor-related protein 4 is crucial for formation of the neuromuscular junction. Development 133:4993-5000.
Weston C, Gordon C, Teressa G, Hod E, Ren XD, Prives J (2003) Cooperative regulation by Rac and Rho of agrin-induced acetylcholine receptor clustering in muscle cells. J Biol Chem 278:6450-6455.
Weston C, Yee B, Hod E, Prives J (2000) Agrin-induced acetylcholine receptor clustering is mediated by the small guanosine triphosphatases Rac and Cdc42. J Cell Biol 150:205-212.
Weston CA, Teressa G, Weeks BS, Prives J (2007) Agrin and laminin induce acetylcholine receptor clustering by convergent, Rho GTPase-dependent signaling pathways. J Cell Sci 120:868-875.
Yumoto N, Kim N, Burden SJ (2012) Lrp4 is a retrograde signal for presynaptic differentiation at neuromuscular synapses. Nature 489:438-442.
Zhang B, Luo S, Wang Q, Suzuki T, Xiong WC, Mei L (2008) LRP4 serves as a coreceptor of agrin. Neuron 60:285-297.
Zhang H, Sathyamurthy A, Liu F, Li L, Zhang L, Dong Z, Cui W, Sun X, Zhao K, Wang H, Henry Ho SY, Xiong WC, Mei L (2019) Agrin-Lrp4-Ror2 signaling regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mice. Elife 8:e45303.
Zoli M, Pucci S, Vilella A, Gotti C (2018) Neuronal and extraneuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Curr Neuropharmacol 16:338-349.
Zong Y, Zhang B, Gu S, Lee K, Zhou J, Yao G, Figueiredo D, Perry K, Mei L, Jin R (2012) Structural basis of agrin-LRP4-MuSK signaling. Genes Dev 26:247-258.
C-Editors: Zhao M, Li JY; T-Editor: Jia Y