Neural Regeneration Research

: 2021  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 382--387

Dynamic changes in the systemic immune responses of spinal cord injury model mice

Tian-Yun Gao1, Fei-Fei Huang1, Yuan-Yuan Xie1, Wen-Qing Wang1, Liu-Di Wang1, Dan Mu2, Yi Cui3, Bin Wang1,  
1 Clinical Stem Cell Center, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
2 Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
3 Reproductive and Genetic Center of National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing, China

Correspondence Address:
Bin Wang
Clinical Stem Cell Center, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province


Intraspinal inflammatory and immune responses are considered to play central roles in the pathological development of spinal cord injury. This study aimed to decipher the dynamics of systemic immune responses, initiated by spinal cord injury. The spinal cord in mice was completely transected at T8. Changes in the in vivo inflammatory response, between the acute and subacute stages, were observed. A rapid decrease in C-reactive protein levels, circulating leukocytes and lymphocytes, spleen-derived CD4+ interferon-γ+ T-helper cells, and inflammatory cytokines, and a marked increase in neutrophils, monocytes, and CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T-cells were observed during the acute phase. These systemic immune alterations were gradually restored to basal levels during the sub-acute phase. During the acute phase of spinal cord injury, systemic immune cells and factors showed significant inhibition; however, this inhibition was transient, and the indicators of these serious disorders gradually returned to baseline levels during the subacute phase. All experiments were performed in accordance with the institutional animal care guidelines, approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Experimental Animal Center of Drum Tower Hospital, China (approval No. 2019AE01040) on June 25, 2019.

How to cite this article:
Gao TY, Huang FF, Xie YY, Wang WQ, Wang LD, Mu D, Cui Y, Wang B. Dynamic changes in the systemic immune responses of spinal cord injury model mice.Neural Regen Res 2021;16:382-387

How to cite this URL:
Gao TY, Huang FF, Xie YY, Wang WQ, Wang LD, Mu D, Cui Y, Wang B. Dynamic changes in the systemic immune responses of spinal cord injury model mice. Neural Regen Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2020 Oct 24 ];16:382-387
Available from:

Full Text


Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a refractory neurological disorder with no breakthrough therapy currently available. SCI is commonly characterized by primary and secondary injuries (Garcia et al., 2016). Initially, mechanical insults, such as trauma, directly cause a primary injury. Secondary injuries can be derived from a plethora of pathological changes, over time, including vascular damage, demyelination, inflammatory responses, metabolic disorders, and excitotoxicity. Intraspinal inflammatory and immunity responses are considered to play central roles in the evolving pathological development and coordination of various secondary injury mechanisms, which exacerbate clinical neurological deficits (Kwon et al., 2004; Allison and Ditor, 2015; Faden et al., 2016; Brennan and Popovich, 2018).

Intraspinal inflammation elicited by SCI has been well studied, and the inflammatory response that follows SCI is a smoldering and non-self-limiting inflammatory cascade, orchestrated by a series of different cell types, including infiltrating immune cells, microglia, astrocytes, and endotheliocytes (David et al., 2018). Infiltrating immune cells have been demonstrated to act as major contributors to the intraspinal cord inflammatory responses elicited by SCI (Allison and Ditor, 2015). Leukocytes in the peripheral blood are recruited to injured sites, in a time-dependent manner, by the early immune response following SCI (Mietto et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2018). Monocytes and neutrophils have been observed to infiltrate the injury and surrounding areas, attracted by the cytokines and chemokines that are released, first from glial cells and, subsequently, from endothelial cells. Infiltrated peripheral immune cells and endogenous microglia respond synergistically to SCI (Orr and Gensel, 2018). Different immune subsets have distinct effects on neuroprotection or neurotoxicity, or both; thus, SCI recovery depends on the various interactions among these subset populations (Kipnis et al., 2002; Mege et al., 2006; Kigerl et al., 2009; Thawer et al., 2013; Järve et al., 2018). Although several types of immune cells have been identified to participate in recovery processes after SCI (Schwab et al., 2014), we do not yet fully understand their temporal and spatial regulation, the associated cellular and molecular mechanisms, or the interrelationships that occur among these cell types.

Normally, the peripheral immune response is vital to the maintenance of spinal cord homeostasis. SCI causes dysfunction or losses in the vegetative innervation of endocrine and lymphatic tissues, resulting in long-lasting, aberrant inflammatory responses (Zhang et al., 2013). The local immune response associated with SCI can affect the systemic immune response, which, in turn, influences both the pathophysiological changes that occur in the injured area and the repair process. Existing “compartmentalized” studies have primarily focused on limited intraspinal inflammation and immunity and the associated cellular or molecular mechanisms that occur in the spinal cord. Although systemic immune activity affects the central nervous system (CNS), beyond the compartmentalized inflammatory responses that occur in the spinal cord, which can influence the recovery of tissue structures and motor function following SCI, these effects have been less well characterized than those associated with intraspinal inflammation (Popovich and McTigue, 2009).

CD4+ T-helper cells play critical roles in proper host defenses and normal immune-regulation, differentiating into functionally distinct T-helper subsets (Abbas et al., 1996; Murphy and Reiner, 2002). CD4+ CD25+ forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)+ regulatory T-cells (Tregs) represent an important T-cell subset with an indispensable role in the maintenance of immune tolerance and the suppression of excessive detrimental immune reactions by the host (Popovich and McTigue, 2009; Nakayamada et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2013). Various subsets of infiltrating immune cells play specific roles in neurotoxicity and neuroprotection, and the recovery of CNS damage may depend on the balance among these subtypes (Hu et al., 2016). These subsets affect the pathophysiology of SCI through the release of cytokines and growth factors, which act as signaling proteins. The balance between the pro- and anti-inflammatory effects mediated by these molecules plays a key role in the progression and prognosis of SCI lesions (Garcia et al., 2016). Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 are critical mediators of inflammatory reactions, whereas IL-10 has multiple effects on immune regulation and inflammation, and can inhibit the effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by macrophages and Tregs. Additionally, IL-10 can also act on Tregs to maintain the expression of the transcription factor Foxp3 (Rubtsov et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2016).

The dynamic interactions between CNS-innervated peripheral immune organs and the immune-privileged spinal cord, therefore, must be examined to accurately evaluate the evolving state of SCI. In this study, we surveyed changes in the systemic immune system, over time, following SCI. We revealed an integral spectrum of systemic immune responses that are initiated by SCI, providing further understanding of the pathophysiological process that occur after SCI, and revealing targets for the future immunotherapy of SCI.

 Materials and Methods


Thirty specific-pathogen-free, female, C57BL/6 mice, weighing 20–25 g and aged 8 weeks old, were purchased from Charles River Laboratories [Jiaxin, Zhejiang Province, China; license No. SCXK (Zhe) 2019-0001] and were housed the animal facilities of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, with food and water ad libitum, in a 12-hour light/dark cycle. All experiments were performed in accordance with the institutional animal care guidelines and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Experimental Animal Center of Drum Tower Hospital, China (approval No. 2019AE01040) on June 25, 2019.

SCI surgery

SCI was established according to the previously reported protocols, with minor modifications (Schwab et al., 2014; Kullmann et al., 2019). Briefly, mice were anesthetized with 5% isoflurane (VETEASY, RWD Life Science Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China; 1.5–2% [v/v] in O2) in Matrx Animal Aneathesia Ventilator System (VMR, MIDMARK Corporation, Torrance, CA, USA). A laminectomy was performed, between the T8–9 vertebrae, and the spinal cord was completely transected. The sham animals were exposed in the same manner, but the spinal cords were not damaged. Gelfoam was placed above the spinal cord, to achieve hemostasis. The muscle and skin were closed with absorbable sutures (Vicryl, 3-0, Ethicon Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA). The animals received 200 μL pre-warmed saline, through intraperitoneal injection, and were allowed to recover on a heating pad, for 3–6 hours. Animals were intraperitoneally injected with ceftriaxone sodium (50 mg/kg, drug license No. H20043014; Youcare Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Corona, CA, USA), to prevent infection, once per day, for 3 days. The bladders of mice with SCI were manually voided twice during the entire experiment.

Complete blood count

After euthanasia, approximately 0.5 mL blood was collected from the cephalic vein, in syringes containing [K2]-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Complete blood count analysis was performed, using an automated hematology machine (COULTER® LH 750, Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA), including erythrocyte counts and three-part differential (lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils), as well as a series of erythrocyte parameters. Complete blood count was performed 0, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days after SCI.

C-reactive protein measurement

The quantitative measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) in mouse plasma was performed 0, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days after SCI, using a commercial mouse CRP enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (SEKM-0059; Solarbio, Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Plasma samples were diluted to 1:2000, and 100 μL of the diluted sample was added to separate antibody-coated microplate wells. A 100-μL volume of the urea peroxide substrate, 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine as the chromogen was added to each well to initiate color development. The reaction was interrupted with a stop solution, and absorbance was detected with a microplate reader (#237062; BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) at 450 nm. Quantification was performed using a standard curve, which was generated by measuring serial two-fold dilutions of the standard provided with the kit.

Splenocyte preparation

Mice were anesthetized with 1.25% tribromoethanol, and then the spleens were removed and ground. A single-splenocyte suspension was obtained by passing the ground tissue through a 100-μm wire mesh. The viability of the freshly collected single-splenocyte suspension was verified with trypan blue staining, which demonstrated cell viability greater than 99%. A total of 2 × 105 cells were suspended in individual tubes and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (GibcoTM Cat# 12633012; Life Technologies Co., Carlsbad, CA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Cat# 10099141; Life Technologies Co.), 100 U/mL of penicillin, 100 μg/mL of streptomycin (Cat# 10378016; Life Technologies Co.), and 2.5 μL T-cell induction Cocktail (Cat# 004975-93; eBioscience, Carlsbad, CA, USA), for 5 hours, at 37°C, in a 5% CO2 incubator. The BD FACSCantoTM Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences, Beijing, China) was used to detect the differentiation of T-cell subsets.

Hematoxylin-eosin staining

Fourteen days after SCI surgery, the animals were anesthetized with 1.25% tribromoethanol and transcranially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde. The spinal cord was harvested and stored overnight, in 4% paraformaldehyde, and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose, at 4°C, for at least 48 hours. The spinal cord tissues were prepared into 8-μm-thick optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound-embedded sections, at –20°C. Specimens were successively immersed in 75%, 95%, and 100% ethanol and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Images were captured by a microscope (BX43; Olympus, Beijing, China).

Immunofluorescence staining

Mice were sacrificed 14 days after SCI and were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde. Spinal cord samples were harvested and dehydrated, using graded sucrose, and then embedded in OCT at –20°C. The samples were cut into 8-μm thick sections, with a freezing microtome (CM 1900; Leica, ↱Wetzlar, Germany), and stored at –80°C. Before immunostaining, the frozen sections were allowed to come to room temperature for 10 minutes and then were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline. After blocking with 5% fetal bovine serum, the sections were incubated with rabbit anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein polyclonal antibody (1:500; Cat# ab7260; Abcam), overnight at 4°C. Afterward, the sections were covered with AlexaFluor568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (ready to use; Cat# ab11011; Abcam) and were incubated for 60 minutes, at room temperature. Subsequently, these sections were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Cat# ab104139; Abcam). Immunostained sections were analyzed under a fluorescence microscope (TCS-SP8; Leica).

Flow cytometric analysis of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines

The following fluorochrome-labeled antibodies were used for flow cytometric analysis, according to the manufacturers’ protocols: anti-mouse CD4 fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, Cat# 11-0041-82; eBioscience), anti-mouse IFN-γ allophycocyanin (APC, Cat# 17-7311-82; eBioscience), anti-mouse IL-17A phycoerythrin (PE, Cat# 12-7177-81; eBioscience), anti-mouse CD25 APC (Cat# 17-0251-82; eBioscience), and anti-mouse FoxP3 PE (Cat# 12-5773-82; eBioscience). Finally, the stained cells were analyzed by a FACSCantoTM flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo V10 software (BD Biosciences).

Cytokine array

The inflammatory cytokine levels in splenocyte-stimulated supernatant were determined, using a customized Mouse Premixed Multi-Analyte Kit (LXSAMSM-10; Luminex, Beijing, China). In accordance with the manufacturer's protocol, each cytokine was combined with the corresponding antibody-conjugated 5000 beads. Biotinylated detection antibodies were incubated with streptavidin-R-PE. Cytokine levels were measured by a LuminexTM MAGPIXTM. The data were analyzed using Milliplex Analyst 5.1 software (Vigene Tech, Darmstadt, Germany).

Statistical analysis

The results are represented as the mean ± SEM. The data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software (version 5) (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test, was used to perform pairwise comparisons for normally distributed data. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.


Pathological changes observed in the completely transected spinal cord

After the spinal cord was completely transected at T8, the model mice completely lost sensory and motor functions below the injury level. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was performed, to observe the pathological changes in the injured spinal cord. The normal structure of the spinal cord was lost, and many immune cells infiltrated the injury sites 14 days after SCI [Figure 1]A and [Figure 1]B. Immunofluorescence staining for glial fibrillary acidic protein [an astrocyte marker (van Bodegraven et al., 2019)] showed an obvious astrocyte-devoid area in the injured spinal cord [Figure 1]C. CRP is an acute-phase protein that participates in the response to inflammation, infection, and tissue damage (Kang et al., 2010). Compared with baseline levels, serum CRP levels were significantly increased 3 days after SCI, before gradually decreasing to basal levels [Figure 1]D.{Figure 1}

Subpopulations in the peripheral blood after SCI

Leukocytes infiltrate the injured spinal cord after the insult (Beck et al., 2010). Circulating leukocytes were assessed, to analyze dynamic changes in the peripheral blood after SCI. SCI did not affect the concentration of erythrocytes in the peripheral blood at the tested time points [Figure 2]A. In contrast, the concentration of leukocytes significantly decreased 3 and 5 days after surgery, and then gradually increased over time [Figure 2]B. Further analysis of the leukocyte subpopulations showed that the proportion of lymphocytes in total leukocytes was markedly decreased 3 days after surgery, before gradually returning to the basal level [Figure 2]C. In strong contrast, 3 days after surgery, the proportion of neutrophils in total leukocytes increased by approximately three-fold, compared with that in the sham group, and then rapidly decreased from 5 to 14 days, returning to near-basal levels [Figure 2]D. The monocyte analysis showed a similar pattern as observed for neutrophils in the SCI model mice. The proportion of monocytes in total leukocytes was significantly increased, 3 days after surgery, and then decreased, 5, 7, and 14 days after surgery [Figure 2]E. The numbers of total peripheral blood cells at the indicated time points are presented in Additional Table 1.{Figure 2}

Dynamic changes in T-cell subsets

To evaluate dynamic changes among the CD4+ T-cell subsets during the systematic inflammatory response to SCI, splenocytes were isolated from sham and SCI model mice and stimulated, ex vivo, with Cell Stimulation Cocktail, which can induce cell activation, followed by the flow cytometric analysis of CD4+ T-cell subsets. Compared with the sham group, SCI mice showed a significant decrease in the proportion of CD4+IFN-γ+ T-cells, 3 (P < 0.01), 5 (P < 0.001), and 7 (P < 0.05) days after surgery. Notably, 14 days after surgery, the proportion of CD4+IFN-γ+ T-cells was higher in the SCI group than that in the sham group (P < 0.01). CD4+IL-17A+ T-cells presented a larger population 7 days after surgery in the SCI group compared with the sham group (P < 0.001; [Figure 3]A, [Figure 3]B, [Figure 3]C, [Figure 3]D. SCI caused a slight increase in the numbers of CD4+IL-17A+IFN-γ+ T-cells at the indicated time points, but these differences were not significant compared with baseline levels [Figure 3]E. The present study further analyzed the frequency of Tregs within the population of CD4+ cells in the spleen after SCI, using the Treg antibody panel. The flow cytometric analysis showed that the proportions of Tregs were significantly increased in the SCI group compared with those in the sham group, at 3 (P < 0.001), 5 (P < 0.001), and 7 (P < 0.01) days after surgery [Figure 3]F, [Figure 3]G, [Figure 3]H, indicating that SCI induces rapid and dynamic changes in circulating Tregs.{Figure 3}

Expression of inflammatory cytokines in splenocytes

Various inflammatory cytokines secreted into the culture supernatant after spleen cell stimulation were measured at the indicated times after SCI, using a mouse cytokine array. Our results showed that SCI resulted in paradoxical inflammatory cytokine expression. The expression levels of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-17A, and IL-10 remained stable, without any marked changes, at all indicated time points (Additional Figure 1). The expression levels of inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α, IFN-γ, and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 decreased slightly, 3, 5, and 7 days after SCI, and increased significantly, 14 days after SCI, compared with basal levels [Figure 4]A, [Figure 4]C, and[Figure 4]E. In the sham group, the expression levels of inflammatory IL-6 and IL-4 were significantly downregulated 3 days after surgery, compared with the basal levels, but became gradually upregulated and increased beyond the basal expression level, 14 days after surgery [Figure 4]B and [Figure 4]D. The expression level of transforming growth factor-β was inhibited, 3 and 5 days after SCI (P < 0.05), but increased beyond the basal expression level 7 days after SCI (P < 0.05), before returning to near-normal levels [Figure 4]F. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor is an inflammatory mediator, involved in various inflammatory responses and immunity processes (Ushach and Zlotnik, 2016). Compared with the basal level, the expression of macrophage colony-stimulating factor significantly decreased, 3 days after insult, and then gradually increased but never reached the basal expression level, even 14 days after surgery [Figure 4]G.{Figure 4}


Inflammatory and immune responses are thought to play central roles in the evolving pathological development of SCI (David et al., 2018). Clarifying the dynamic changes that occur during the inflammatory and immune responses will help us to further understand the pathological development of SCI. However, the previous investigations of the systemic immune response triggered by SCI have not yet been sufficiently detailed. In the present study, we surveyed the peripheral inflammatory changes in response to the complete SCI transection in mice, to provide a better understanding of the inflammatory and immune processes that occur after SCI, which may lead to improved SCI immunotherapy in the future.

The functional “cross-talk” between the immune system and the CNS is regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the autonomic nervous system, which comprises the parasympathetic nervous system and the sympathetic nervous system (Elenkov et al., 2000). The sympathetic nervous system innervates immune tissues and organs, such as the lymphoid and spleen tissues, which respond to neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and hormones derived from the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system through the activation of specific surface receptors. The peripheral sensory nerves express the receptors for cytokine and chemokines, which can reach the spinal cord and brain by crossing circumventricular organs and/or specific transport matter (Schwab et al., 2014), allowing the cytokines and/or chemokines released by leukocytes after immune activation to affect the function of the CNS. If the innervation of the immune system by the sympathetic nervous system is ablated by SCI, normal interactions between the CNS and the immune system become interrupted, resulted in SCI-associated immune depression syndrome. CRP is a common marker of acute inflammation (Kang et al., 2010), and we found that the serum CRP levels were strikingly increased during the acute phase of SCI (3 days post-surgery), before gradually decreasing during the sub-acute phase of SCI, although these levels continued to exceed baseline levels, indicating the presence of a persistent inflammatory response to SCI, during both the acute and sub-acute phases. SCI results in direct “sterile” inflammation and autoimmunity (for example, the CRP response), triggered by self-antigens or pathological damage at the injury site and/or nearby regions of the spinal cord, and indirect systemic immune dysfunctions may be influenced by the loss of neuro-immune communications.

Acute SCI has been associated with immune depression syndrome, due to the dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system, and has been suggested by some researchers to function as a means for preventing or confining damage. However, simultaneously, systemic SCI-associated immune depression syndrome may disrupt the efficiency of protective immunity (Jones, 2014). Interestingly, we found that systemic immunosuppression was transient during the acute phase of SCI, whereas most dysregulated indicators of immunization and inflammatory responses were progressively restored to near baseline levels during the sub-acute phase. These results differ from the post-SCI immune dysregulation reported in previous studies, which lasted from the acute to chronic phases (Cruse et al., 1993, 1996; Lucin et al., 2007, 2009; Zhang et al., 2013). The temporal changes in the mobilization of systemic immunity after SCI emphasizes the complex and paradoxical patterns of immune and inflammatory responses after SCI. For example, the dynamic changes observed in lymphocytes contrasted with the changes observed for neutrophils and monocytes among the total leukocyte population after SCI. The evolving state of CD4+IFN-γ+ T-helper cells and CD4+IL17A+ T-helper cells demonstrated a completely different pattern from that observed for CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ Tregs in the spleen. The generic therapies aimed at immune suppression are largely unsuccessful because of the temporal evolution in immunity and inflammation that occurs after SCI and their changing functions over time (Schwab et al., 2014). Additionally, most studies examining neuro-immunity after SCI have focused on the “compartmentalized” intraspinal inflammation and immunity, and the associated cellular and molecular mechanisms that occur in the spinal cord, but neglecting to examine time-based changes in systemic inflammation.

The SCI-elicited inflammatory response is a double-edged sword, exerting both detrimental and beneficial effects, over time, for the recovery of SCI. The spinal cord healing process is multifactorial, and the peripheral immune response is vital to the maintenance of spinal cord homeostasis (Rust and Kaiser, 2017). The local immune response to SCI affects the systemic immune response, which in turn influences the pathophysiological changes that occur in the injured area and the repair process. Systemic immune dysfunction represents a component of the “SCI disease” continuum and likely directly or indirectly affects the “immune-specialized” milieu of the spinal cord. Thus, additional studies remain necessary to further investigate the occurrence and development of systemic immunity and inflammation, the interplay between systemic and intraspinal inflammation and immunity, and the crosstalk between immunity and neuronal regeneration. A strong understanding of the systemic immune alterations that are driven by CNS injuries, such as SCI, cerebral stroke, and traumatic brain injury, are necessary for the development of effective drugs designed to reverse dysregulated immune responses and functions, by targeting key immune checkpoints, to achieve structural and functional repair in CNS-injured patients.

In short, we surveyed systemic immune alterations over time, after SCI, and found that SCI resulted in acute systemic immune dysregulation, affecting CRP levels, circulating leukocyte concentrations, the CD4+ T-cell subsets derived from splenocytes, and inflammatory cytokine expression; however, this systemic immune dysregulation was transiently and progressively restored during the sub-acute phase of SCI. Our study deciphered an integral spectrum of systemic immune responses that are initiated by SCI and provided a further understanding of the crosstalk between the nervous and immune systems, as well as systemic and intraspinal inflammation and immunity.

Author contributions: Study concept and design: BW; in vivo experiments: TYG, FFH, YYX, WQW, and LDW; statistical analysis: DM, and YC; manuscript writing: TYG; manuscript revision: TYG and BW. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Financial support: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nos. 81571213 (to BW), 81800583 (to YYX), 81601539 (to DM), and 81601084 (to YC); the National Key Research and Development Program of China, No. 2017YFA0104304 (to BW); the Nanjing Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation of China, Nos. QRX17006 (to BW), QRX17057 (to DM); the Key Project Supported by Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation, Nanjing Department of Health and the Nanjing Medical Science of China, No. 201803024 (to TYG) and Innovation Platform, No. ZDX16005 (to BW). The funders had no roles in the study design, conduction of experiment, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional review board statement: The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Experimental Animal Center of Drum Tower Hospital, China (approval No. 2019AE01040) on June 25, 2019.

Copyright license agreement: The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.

Data sharing statement: Datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

identical terms.

Open peer reviewer: Siddharth Krishnan, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, UK.

Additional files:

Additional Table 1: The cell number of peripheral blood cells[SUPPORTING:1].

Additional Figure 1: Inflammatory cytokines without expression change in splenocytes[SUPPORTING:2].

Additional file 1: Open peer review report 1[SUPPORTING:3].

Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nos. 81571213 (to BW), 81800583 (to YYX), 81601539 (to DM), and 81601084 (to YC); the National Key Research and Development Program of China, No. 2017YFA0104304 (to BW); the Nanjing Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation of China, Nos. QRX17006 (to BW), QRX17057 (to DM); the Key Project Supported by Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation, Nanjing Department of Health and the Nanjing Medical Science of China, No. 201803024 (to TYG) and Innovation Platform, No. ZDX16005 (to BW).


1Abbas AK, Murphy KM, Sher A (1996) Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature 383:787-793.
2Allison DJ, Ditor DS (2015) Immune dysfunction and chronic inflammation following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 53:14-18.
3Beck KD, Nguyen HX, Galvan MD, Salazar DL, Woodruff TM, Anderson AJ (2010) Quantitative analysis of cellular inflammation after traumatic spinal cord injury: evidence for a multiphasic inflammatory response in the acute to chronic environment. Brain 133:433-447.
4Brennan FH, Popovich PG (2018) Emerging targets for reprograming the immune response to promote repair and recovery of function after spinal cord injury. Curr Opin Neurol 31:334-344.
5Cruse JM, Keith JC, Bryant ML Jr, Lewis RE Jr (1996) Immune system-neuroendocrine dysregulation in spinal cord injury. Immunol Res 15:306-314.
6Cruse JM, Lewis RE Jr, Bishop GR, Kliesch WF, Gaitan E, Britt R (1993) Decreased immune reactivity and neuroendocrine alterations related to chronic stress in spinal cord injury and stroke patients. Pathobiology 61:183-192.
7David S, Kroner A, Greenhalgh AD, Zarruk JG, López-Vales R (2018) Myeloid cell responses after spinal cord injury. J Neuroimmunol 321:97-108.
8Elenkov IJ, Wilder RL, Chrousos GP, Vizi ES (2000) The sympathetic nerve--an integrative interface between two supersystems: the brain and the immune system. Pharmacol Rev 52:595-638.
9Faden AI, Wu J, Stoica BA, Loane DJ (2016) Progressive inflammation-mediated neurodegeneration after traumatic brain or spinal cord injury. Br J Pharmacol 173:681-691.
10Garcia E, Aguilar-Cevallos J, Silva-Garcia R, Ibarra A (2016) Cytokine and growth factor activation in vivo and in vitro after spinal cord injury. Mediators Inflamm 2016:9476020.
11Hu JG, Shi LL, Chen YJ, Xie XM, Zhang N, Zhu AY, Jiang ZS, Feng YF, Zhang C, Xi J, Lü HZ (2016) Differential effects of myelin basic protein-activated Th1 and Th2 cells on the local immune microenvironment of injured spinal cord. Exp Neurol 277:190-201.
12Järve A, Todiras M, Kny M, Fischer FI, Kraemer JF, Wessel N, Plehm R, Fielitz J, Alenina N, Bader M (2018) Angiotensin-(1-7) receptor Mas in hemodynamic and thermoregulatory dysfunction after high-level spinal cord injury in mice: a pilot study. Front Physiol 9:1930.
13Jones TB (2014) Lymphocytes and autoimmunity after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 258:78-90.
14Kang BU, Lee SH, Ahn Y, Choi WC, Choi YG (2010) Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: detection and management based on serial C-reactive protein measurements. J Neurosurg Spine 13:158-164.
15Kigerl KA, Gensel JC, Ankeny DP, Alexander JK, Donnelly DJ, Popovich PG (2009) Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci 29:13435-13444.
16Kipnis J, Mizrahi T, Hauben E, Shaked I, Shevach E, Schwartz M (2002) Neuroprotective autoimmunity: naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress the ability to withstand injury to the central nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:15620-15625.
17Kullmann AF, Truschel ST, Wolf-Johnston AS, McDonnell BM, Lynn AM, Kanai AJ, Kessler TM, Apodaca G, Birder LA (2019) Acute spinal cord injury is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in mouse urothelium. Neurourol Urodyn 38:1551-1559.
18Kwon BK, Tetzlaff W, Grauer JN, Beiner J, Vaccaro AR (2004) Pathophysiology and pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Spine J 4:451-464.
19Lucin KM, Sanders VM, Popovich PG (2009) Stress hormones collaborate to induce lymphocyte apoptosis after high level spinal cord injury. J Neurochem 110:1409-1421.
20Lucin KM, Sanders VM, Jones TB, Malarkey WB, Popovich PG (2007) Impaired antibody synthesis after spinal cord injury is level dependent and is due to sympathetic nervous system dysregulation. Exp Neurol 207:75-84.
21Mege JL, Meghari S, Honstettre A, Capo C, Raoult D (2006) The two faces of interleukin 10 in human infectious diseases. Lancet Infect Dis 6:557-569.
22Mietto BS, Mostacada K, Martinez AM (2015) Neurotrauma and inflammation: CNS and PNS responses. Mediators Inflamm 2015:251204.
23Murphy KM, Reiner SL (2002) The lineage decisions of helper T cells. Nat Rev Immunol 2:933-944.
24Nakayamada S, Takahashi H, Kanno Y, O'Shea JJ (2012) Helper T cell diversity and plasticity. Curr Opin Immunol 24:297-302.
25Orr MB, Gensel JC (2018) Spinal cord injury scarring and inflammation: therapies targeting glial and inflammatory responses. Neurotherapeutics 15:541-553.
26Popovich P, McTigue D (2009) Damage control in the nervous system: beware the immune system in spinal cord injury. Nat Med 15:736-737.
27Rubtsov YP, Rasmussen JP, Chi EY, Fontenot J, Castelli L, Ye X, Treuting P, Siewe L, Roers A, Henderson WR Jr, Muller W, Rudensky AY (2008) Regulatory T cell-derived interleukin-10 limits inflammation at environmental interfaces. Immunity 28:546-558.
28Rust R, Kaiser J (2017) Insights into the dual role of inflammation after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 37:4658-4660.
29Schwab JM, Zhang Y, Kopp MA, Brommer B, Popovich PG (2014) The paradox of chronic neuroinflammation, systemic immune suppression, autoimmunity after traumatic chronic spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 258:121-129.
30Sun G, Yang S, Cao G, Wang Q, Hao J, Wen Q, Li Z, So KF, Liu Z, Zhou S, Zhao Y, Yang H, Zhou L, Yin Z (2018) γδ T cells provide the early source of IFN-γ to aggravate lesions in spinal cord injury. J Exp Med 215:521-535.
31Thawer SG, Mawhinney L, Chadwick K, de Chickera SN, Weaver LC, Brown A, Dekaban GA (2013) Temporal changes in monocyte and macrophage subsets and microglial macrophages following spinal cord injury in the Lys-Egfp-ki mouse model. J Neuroimmunol 261:7-20.
32Ushach I, Zlotnik A (2016) Biological role of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) on cells of the myeloid lineage. J Leukoc Biol 100:481-489.
33van Bodegraven EJ, van Asperen JV, Robe PAJ, Hol EM (2019) Importance of GFAP isoform-specific analyses in astrocytoma. Glia 67:1417-1433.
34Wang S, Gao X, Shen G, Wang W, Li J, Zhao J, Wei YQ, Edwards CK (2016) Interleukin-10 deficiency impairs regulatory T cell-derived neuropilin-1 functions and promotes Th1 and Th17 immunity. Sci Rep 6:24249.
35Zhang Y, Guan Z, Reader B, Shawler T, Mandrekar-Colucci S, Huang K, Weil Z, Bratasz A, Wells J, Powell ND, Sheridan JF, Whitacre CC, Rabchevsky AG, Nash MS, Popovich PG (2013) Autonomic dysreflexia causes chronic immune suppression after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 33:12970-12981.